Realities of opioid and gabapentinoid deprescribing in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities: qualitative evaluation.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-07-25 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0160
Charlotte L Parbery-Clark, Jennie Sofia Portice, Sarah Sowden
{"title":"Realities of opioid and gabapentinoid deprescribing in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities: qualitative evaluation.","authors":"Charlotte L Parbery-Clark, Jennie Sofia Portice, Sarah Sowden","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid and gabapentinoid prescribing has increased substantially in recent years despite having limited effectiveness in treating chronic primary pain. This is concerning with the prescribing rates and adverse effects of these medications being higher in more socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. Guidance for prescribing and deprescribing these medications exists but the understanding of how deprescribing is operationalised especially in areas of socio-economic disadvantage is limited.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore primary healthcare professionals' views and experiences of designing and implementing an intervention to reduce opioid and gabapentinoid prescribing.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>A qualitative evaluation, using participant observation and semi-structured interviews with primary healthcare professionals working in practices serving areas of substantial socio-economic disadvantage.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Interviewees were purposively recruited with subsequent snowballing with participant observation of the peer-support meetings. Interviews transcripts and notes from the participant observation were inductively coded and thematically analysed.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Thirteen healthcare professionals from five practices were interviewed. Person-centred care with shared decision-making was strived for which was time consuming due to the complexity of the problem and patients. Where shared-decision making was not possible due to patient refusal or non-engagement, risk was used to determine the appropriate action. This work involved an emotional toll on staff and patients but was at times conversely easier and more rewarding than expected. Ultimately, demedicalising pain with a culture change is required to ensure patients are not prescribed these medications for inappropriate reasons or doses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates key operational aspects to consider when undertaking opioid and gabapentinoid deprescribing in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Opioid and gabapentinoid prescribing has increased substantially in recent years despite having limited effectiveness in treating chronic primary pain. This is concerning with the prescribing rates and adverse effects of these medications being higher in more socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. Guidance for prescribing and deprescribing these medications exists but the understanding of how deprescribing is operationalised especially in areas of socio-economic disadvantage is limited.

Aim: To explore primary healthcare professionals' views and experiences of designing and implementing an intervention to reduce opioid and gabapentinoid prescribing.

Design & setting: A qualitative evaluation, using participant observation and semi-structured interviews with primary healthcare professionals working in practices serving areas of substantial socio-economic disadvantage.

Method: Interviewees were purposively recruited with subsequent snowballing with participant observation of the peer-support meetings. Interviews transcripts and notes from the participant observation were inductively coded and thematically analysed.

Result: Thirteen healthcare professionals from five practices were interviewed. Person-centred care with shared decision-making was strived for which was time consuming due to the complexity of the problem and patients. Where shared-decision making was not possible due to patient refusal or non-engagement, risk was used to determine the appropriate action. This work involved an emotional toll on staff and patients but was at times conversely easier and more rewarding than expected. Ultimately, demedicalising pain with a culture change is required to ensure patients are not prescribed these medications for inappropriate reasons or doses.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates key operational aspects to consider when undertaking opioid and gabapentinoid deprescribing in primary care.

社会经济弱势社区阿片类药物和加巴喷丁类药物停药的现实情况:定性评估。
背景:尽管阿片类药物和加巴喷丁类药物对治疗慢性原发性疼痛的效果有限,但近年来此类药物的处方量却大幅增加。令人担忧的是,这些药物的处方率和不良反应在社会经济条件较差的群体中更高。目的:探讨初级医疗保健专业人员在设计和实施减少阿片类药物和加巴喷丁类药物处方的干预措施时的观点和经验:设计与环境:一项定性评估,采用参与观察和半结构化访谈的方法,访谈对象为在社会经济条件极差地区工作的初级医疗保健专业人员:方法:有目的性地招募受访者,随后通过观察同行支持会议的参与情况,将受访者的信息 "滚雪球 "式地传播出去。对访谈记录和参与观察记录进行归纳编码和主题分析:结果:对来自五家医疗机构的 13 名医护人员进行了访谈。由于问题和患者的复杂性,以人为本、共同决策的护理成为了努力的方向,这也耗费了大量时间。如果由于病人拒绝或不参与而无法共同决策,则采用风险来决定适当的行动。这项工作对工作人员和患者都造成了情感上的伤害,但有时却比预期的更容易、更有价值。最终,需要通过文化变革来实现疼痛的去医疗化,以确保患者不会因为不适当的原因或剂量而被处方这些药物:本研究展示了在初级医疗中取消阿片类药物和加巴喷丁类药物处方时需要考虑的关键操作问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信