HLA Mismatches Identified by a Novel Algorithm Predict Risk of Antibody-mediated Rejection From De Novo Donor-specific Antibodies.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY
Xiaohai Zhang, Nancy L Reinsmoen, Jon A Kobashigawa
{"title":"HLA Mismatches Identified by a Novel Algorithm Predict Risk of Antibody-mediated Rejection From De Novo Donor-specific Antibodies.","authors":"Xiaohai Zhang, Nancy L Reinsmoen, Jon A Kobashigawa","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) remains a barrier to long-term graft and patient survival. Most dnDSA are directed against mismatched donor HLA-DQ antigens. Here, we describe a novel algorithm, which we have termed categorical amino acid mismatched epitope, to evaluate HLA-DQ mismatches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this algorithm, amino acid residues of HLA-DQ protein were categorized into 4 groups based on their chemical characteristics. The likelihood of categorically mismatched peptides presented by the recipient's HLA-DRB1 was expressed as a normalized value, %Rank score. Categorical HLA-DQ mismatches were analyzed in 386 heart transplant recipients who were mismatched with their donors at the HLA-DQB1 locus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the presence of DQB1 mismatches with %Rank score ≤1 was associated with the development of dnDSA (P = 0.002). Furthermore, dnDSA increased the risk of AMR only in recipients who had DQ mismatches with %Rank score ≤1 (hazard ratio = 5.8), but the freedom from AMR was comparable between recipients with dnDSA and those without dnDSA if %Rank scores of DQ mismatching were >1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that HLA-DQ mismatches evaluated by the categorical amino acid mismatched epitope algorithm can stratify the risk of development of dnDSA and AMR in heart transplant recipients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The development of de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) remains a barrier to long-term graft and patient survival. Most dnDSA are directed against mismatched donor HLA-DQ antigens. Here, we describe a novel algorithm, which we have termed categorical amino acid mismatched epitope, to evaluate HLA-DQ mismatches.

Methods: In this algorithm, amino acid residues of HLA-DQ protein were categorized into 4 groups based on their chemical characteristics. The likelihood of categorically mismatched peptides presented by the recipient's HLA-DRB1 was expressed as a normalized value, %Rank score. Categorical HLA-DQ mismatches were analyzed in 386 heart transplant recipients who were mismatched with their donors at the HLA-DQB1 locus.

Results: We found that the presence of DQB1 mismatches with %Rank score ≤1 was associated with the development of dnDSA (P = 0.002). Furthermore, dnDSA increased the risk of AMR only in recipients who had DQ mismatches with %Rank score ≤1 (hazard ratio = 5.8), but the freedom from AMR was comparable between recipients with dnDSA and those without dnDSA if %Rank scores of DQ mismatching were >1.

Conclusions: These results suggest that HLA-DQ mismatches evaluated by the categorical amino acid mismatched epitope algorithm can stratify the risk of development of dnDSA and AMR in heart transplant recipients.

通过新型算法识别的 HLA 错配可预测新捐献者特异性抗体介导的排斥风险。
背景:新的供体特异性抗体(dnDSA)和抗体介导的排斥反应(AMR)的产生仍然是移植物和患者长期存活的障碍。大多数 dnDSA 都是针对不匹配的供体 HLA-DQ 抗原。在这里,我们描述了一种新型算法,我们称之为分类氨基酸错配表位,用于评估 HLA-DQ 错配情况:在该算法中,HLA-DQ 蛋白的氨基酸残基根据其化学特征被分为 4 组。受体的 HLA-DRB1 出现分类错配肽的可能性用归一化值(%Rank 评分)表示。对 386 例心脏移植受者与供体在 HLA-DQB1 基因座上的分类 HLA-DQ 错配情况进行了分析:我们发现,DQB1错配且Rank评分%≤1与dnDSA的发生有关(P = 0.002)。此外,dnDSA仅增加了DQ错配且Rank评分%≤1的受者发生AMR的风险(危险比=5.8),但如果DQ错配的Rank评分%>1,则有dnDSA和无dnDSA的受者发生AMR的几率相当:这些结果表明,通过氨基酸错配表位分类算法评估的HLA-DQ错配可对心脏移植受者发生dnDSA和AMR的风险进行分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transplantation
Transplantation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.30%
发文量
1906
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of The Transplantation Society, and the International Liver Transplantation Society, Transplantation is published monthly and is the most cited and influential journal in the field, with more than 25,000 citations per year. Transplantation has been the trusted source for extensive and timely coverage of the most important advances in transplantation for over 50 years. The Editors and Editorial Board are an international group of research and clinical leaders that includes many pioneers of the field, representing a diverse range of areas of expertise. This capable editorial team provides thoughtful and thorough peer review, and delivers rapid, careful and insightful editorial evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to the journal. Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The journal remains competitive with a time to first decision of fewer than 21 days. Transplantation was the first in the field to offer CME credit to its peer reviewers for reviews completed. The journal publishes original research articles in original clinical science and original basic science. Short reports bring attention to research at the forefront of the field. Other areas covered include cell therapy and islet transplantation, immunobiology and genomics, and xenotransplantation. ​
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信