Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Cyanoacrylate Injection and Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in the Prevention of Gastric Varices Rebleeding.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Zhuang Zeng, Zhihong Wang, Jing Jin, Fumin Zhang, Qianqian Zhang, Xuecan Mei, Derun Kong
{"title":"Comparison of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Cyanoacrylate Injection and Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt in the Prevention of Gastric Varices Rebleeding.","authors":"Zhuang Zeng, Zhihong Wang, Jing Jin, Fumin Zhang, Qianqian Zhang, Xuecan Mei, Derun Kong","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided injection of cyanoacrylate (CYA) and transjugular intrahepatic portal shunts (TIPSs) in the treatment of patients with cirrhosis with ruptured gastric varices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective study, 105 patients with liver cirrhosis and gastric varicose veins who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University between April 2018 and April 2023 without nonselective β-blockers treatment and no portal vein thrombosis were evaluated. The patients were divided into the transjugular intrahepatic portal shunt (TIPS) group (n = 60) and the EUS-CYA group (n = 45) for the purpose of evaluating postoperative rebleeding rates, complications, survival rates, and other factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the follow-up, there was no significant difference in the rebleeding rates between the TIPS group and EUS-CYA group within 3 months (5% vs 2.2%; P = 0.825; 10% vs 20%, P = 0.147). However, the TIPS group had significantly lower rebleeding rates than the EUS-CYA group at 6 months (10% vs 33.3%; P = 0.030) and 1 year or longer (11.7% vs 42.2%; P < 0.01). In terms of hepatic encephalopathy, the incidence rate of the TIPS group was significantly higher than that of the EUS-CYA group (20% vs 2.2%; P = 0.006). In addition, there was no difference in the survival rates between the two groups (93.3% vs 97.8%; P = 0.552).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TIPS is superior to EUS in preventing rebleeding in patients with ruptured varices of the fundus, but it has a higher incidence of hepatic encephalopathy, and there is no difference in long-term survival between the two groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"518-523"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided injection of cyanoacrylate (CYA) and transjugular intrahepatic portal shunts (TIPSs) in the treatment of patients with cirrhosis with ruptured gastric varices.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 105 patients with liver cirrhosis and gastric varicose veins who were admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University between April 2018 and April 2023 without nonselective β-blockers treatment and no portal vein thrombosis were evaluated. The patients were divided into the transjugular intrahepatic portal shunt (TIPS) group (n = 60) and the EUS-CYA group (n = 45) for the purpose of evaluating postoperative rebleeding rates, complications, survival rates, and other factors.

Results: During the follow-up, there was no significant difference in the rebleeding rates between the TIPS group and EUS-CYA group within 3 months (5% vs 2.2%; P = 0.825; 10% vs 20%, P = 0.147). However, the TIPS group had significantly lower rebleeding rates than the EUS-CYA group at 6 months (10% vs 33.3%; P = 0.030) and 1 year or longer (11.7% vs 42.2%; P < 0.01). In terms of hepatic encephalopathy, the incidence rate of the TIPS group was significantly higher than that of the EUS-CYA group (20% vs 2.2%; P = 0.006). In addition, there was no difference in the survival rates between the two groups (93.3% vs 97.8%; P = 0.552).

Conclusions: TIPS is superior to EUS in preventing rebleeding in patients with ruptured varices of the fundus, but it has a higher incidence of hepatic encephalopathy, and there is no difference in long-term survival between the two groups.

内镜超声引导下注射氰基丙烯酸酯与经颈静脉肝内门体分流术在预防胃静脉曲张再出血方面的比较
研究目的本研究旨在探讨内镜超声(EUS)引导下注射氰基丙烯酸酯(CYA)和经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPSs)治疗肝硬化合并胃静脉曲张破裂患者的有效性和安全性:在这项回顾性研究中,对安徽医科大学第一附属医院于2018年4月至2023年4月期间收治的105例未经非选择性β受体阻滞剂治疗且无门静脉血栓形成的肝硬化合并胃静脉曲张患者进行了评估。将患者分为经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)组(n=60)和EUS-CYA组(n=45),以评估术后再出血率、并发症、生存率等因素:随访期间,TIPS 组和 EUS-CYA 组在 3 个月内的再出血率无明显差异(5% vs 2.2%;P= 0.825;10% vs 20%,P= 0.147)。然而,TIPS 组在 6 个月(10% vs 33.3%;P= 0.030)和 1 年或更长时间(11.7% vs 42.2%;P < 0.01)内的再出血率明显低于 EUS-CYA 组。在肝性脑病方面,TIPS 组的发病率明显高于 EUS-CYA 组(20% vs 2.2%;P= 0.006)。此外,两组的存活率没有差异(93.3% vs 97.8%;P= 0.552):TIPS在预防胃底静脉曲张破裂患者再出血方面优于EUS,但肝性脑病的发生率较高,两组患者的长期生存率没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信