The effect of examining somatic alterations with NGS in patients with solid tumors, on patient management: A single-center experience in Turkey.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-25 DOI:10.1177/10781552241266552
Hacı Arak, Bahtiyar Sahinoğlu, Tulay Kus
{"title":"The effect of examining somatic alterations with NGS in patients with solid tumors, on patient management: A single-center experience in Turkey.","authors":"Hacı Arak, Bahtiyar Sahinoğlu, Tulay Kus","doi":"10.1177/10781552241266552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the impact of analyzing somatic alterations using next-generation sequencing (NGS) on treatment management in patients with metastatic solid cancers and their ability to access NGS recommended treatments.MethodsThis retrospective study included eligible patients who underwent NGS on somatic tumor tissue. We examined the clinical and pathological characteristics of these patients and the alterations in their treatment following NGS results.ResultsA total of 101 patients who underwent NGS were included in the study. The most common cancers were non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal, and breast cancers, in that order. The median age was 58 (range 21-82) years, with 60 (59.4%) male participants. The median NGS turnaround time was 23 (range 17-29) days. NGS was performed on tissue from the primary lesion in 89(88%) patients. Predictive, prognostic, actionable, or variants of unknown significance were detected in 62(61.4%) patients. The most frequent variants identified were <i>KRAS, EGFR, TP53, PIK3CA</i>, and other rare mutations. Treatment was altered in 17(16.8%) patients based on NGS results. Of the 30 (29.7%) patients for whom NGS-informed treatment was recommended, only seven (6.9%) received the recommended therapy. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between patients whose treatment was changed based on NGS results and those whose treatment remained unchanged (p = 0.897). There was no difference in OS between patients with and without variants (p = 0.384).ConclusionsNGS analysis of somatic alterations in patients with metastatic cancer may reveal additional variants beyond those identified by baseline tests. However, based on the recommendations of the reimbursement institution in Turkey, only a limited number of patients are able to access treatments recommended by NGS results. Therefore, baseline tests established in Turkey need to be made available in more centers in an appropriate time.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"921-928"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241266552","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the impact of analyzing somatic alterations using next-generation sequencing (NGS) on treatment management in patients with metastatic solid cancers and their ability to access NGS recommended treatments.MethodsThis retrospective study included eligible patients who underwent NGS on somatic tumor tissue. We examined the clinical and pathological characteristics of these patients and the alterations in their treatment following NGS results.ResultsA total of 101 patients who underwent NGS were included in the study. The most common cancers were non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), colorectal, and breast cancers, in that order. The median age was 58 (range 21-82) years, with 60 (59.4%) male participants. The median NGS turnaround time was 23 (range 17-29) days. NGS was performed on tissue from the primary lesion in 89(88%) patients. Predictive, prognostic, actionable, or variants of unknown significance were detected in 62(61.4%) patients. The most frequent variants identified were KRAS, EGFR, TP53, PIK3CA, and other rare mutations. Treatment was altered in 17(16.8%) patients based on NGS results. Of the 30 (29.7%) patients for whom NGS-informed treatment was recommended, only seven (6.9%) received the recommended therapy. There was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between patients whose treatment was changed based on NGS results and those whose treatment remained unchanged (p = 0.897). There was no difference in OS between patients with and without variants (p = 0.384).ConclusionsNGS analysis of somatic alterations in patients with metastatic cancer may reveal additional variants beyond those identified by baseline tests. However, based on the recommendations of the reimbursement institution in Turkey, only a limited number of patients are able to access treatments recommended by NGS results. Therefore, baseline tests established in Turkey need to be made available in more centers in an appropriate time.

用 NGS 检查实体瘤患者体细胞改变对患者管理的影响:土耳其单中心经验。
研究目的本研究旨在探讨使用新一代测序技术(NGS)分析体细胞改变对转移性实体瘤患者治疗管理的影响,以及他们获得 NGS 推荐治疗的能力:这项回顾性研究纳入了对体细胞肿瘤组织进行 NGS 检测的合格患者。我们研究了这些患者的临床和病理特征,以及 NGS 结果出来后他们治疗方法的改变:共有 101 名患者接受了 NGS 检查。最常见的癌症依次为非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)、结直肠癌和乳腺癌。中位年龄为 58 岁(21-82 岁不等),男性参与者为 60 人(59.4%)。NGS 的中位周转时间为 23 天(17-29 天)。89 例(88%)患者的 NGS 是在原发病灶组织上进行的。62 例(61.4%)患者检测到了预测性变异、预后变异、可操作变异或意义不明的变异。最常见的变异是 KRAS、表皮生长因子受体、TP53、PIK3CA 和其他罕见变异。17(16.8%)例患者根据 NGS 结果改变了治疗方案。在根据 NGS 结果建议治疗的 30 例(29.7%)患者中,只有 7 例(6.9%)接受了建议的治疗。根据 NGS 结果改变治疗方案的患者与治疗方案保持不变的患者在总生存期 (OS) 上没有明显差异(p = 0.897)。有变异和无变异患者的 OS 没有差异(p = 0.384):结论:对转移性癌症患者的体细胞变异进行 NGS 分析可能会发现基线检测发现的变异之外的其他变异。然而,根据土耳其报销机构的建议,只有少数患者能够接受 NGS 结果推荐的治疗。因此,在土耳其建立的基线检测需要适时在更多中心推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信