Impacts of three inspiratory muscle training programs on inspiratory muscles strength and endurance among intubated and mechanically ventilated patients with difficult weaning: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Thomas Réginault, Roberto Martinez Alejos, Roxane Coueron, Jean-François Burle, Alexandre Boyer, Eric Frison, Frédéric Vargas
{"title":"Impacts of three inspiratory muscle training programs on inspiratory muscles strength and endurance among intubated and mechanically ventilated patients with difficult weaning: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Thomas Réginault, Roberto Martinez Alejos, Roxane Coueron, Jean-François Burle, Alexandre Boyer, Eric Frison, Frédéric Vargas","doi":"10.1186/s40560-024-00741-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) is well-established as a safe option for combating inspiratory muscles weakness in the intensive care setting. It could improve inspiratory muscle strength and decrease weaning duration but a lack of knowledge on the optimal training regimen raise to inconsistent results. We made the hypothesis that an innovative mixed intensity program for both endurance and strength improvement could be more effective. We conducted a multicentre randomised controlled parallel trial comparing the impacts of three IMT protocols (low, high, and mixed intensity) on inspiratory muscle strength and endurance among difficult-to-wean patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-two patients were randomly assigned to three groups with different training programs, where each performed an IMT program twice daily, 7 days per week, from inclusion until successful extubation or 30 days. The primary outcome was maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) increase. Secondary outcomes included peak pressure (Ppk) increase as an endurance marker, mechanical ventilation (MV) duration, ICU length of stay, weaning success defined by a 2-day ventilator-free after extubation, reintubation rate and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>MIP increases were 10.8 ± 11.9 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, 4.5 ± 14.8 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, and 6.7 ± 14.5 cmH<sub>2</sub>O for the mixed intensity (MI), low intensity (LI), and high intensity (HI) groups, respectively. There was a non-statistically difference between the MI and LI groups (mean adjusted difference: 6.59, 97.5% CI [- 14.36; 1.18], p = 0.056); there was no difference between the MI and HI groups (mean adjusted difference: - 3.52, 97.5% CI [- 11.57; 4.53], p = 0.321). No significant differences in Ppk increase were observed among the three groups. Weaning success rate observed in MI, HI and LI group were 83.7% [95% CI 69.3; 93.2], 82.6% [95% CI 61.2; 95.0] and 73.9% [95% CI 51.6; 89.8], respectively. MV duration, ICU length of stay and reintubation rate had similar values. Over 629 IMT sessions, six adverse events including four spontaneously reversible bradycardia in LI group were possibly related to the study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among difficult-to-wean patients receiving invasive MV, no statistically difference was observed in strength and endurance progression across three different IMT programs. IMT appears to be feasible in usual cares, but some serious adverse events such as bradycardia could motivate further research on the specific impact on cardiac system. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02855619. Registered 28 September 2014.</p>","PeriodicalId":16123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11271199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40560-024-00741-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inspiratory muscle training (IMT) is well-established as a safe option for combating inspiratory muscles weakness in the intensive care setting. It could improve inspiratory muscle strength and decrease weaning duration but a lack of knowledge on the optimal training regimen raise to inconsistent results. We made the hypothesis that an innovative mixed intensity program for both endurance and strength improvement could be more effective. We conducted a multicentre randomised controlled parallel trial comparing the impacts of three IMT protocols (low, high, and mixed intensity) on inspiratory muscle strength and endurance among difficult-to-wean patients.

Methods: Ninety-two patients were randomly assigned to three groups with different training programs, where each performed an IMT program twice daily, 7 days per week, from inclusion until successful extubation or 30 days. The primary outcome was maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) increase. Secondary outcomes included peak pressure (Ppk) increase as an endurance marker, mechanical ventilation (MV) duration, ICU length of stay, weaning success defined by a 2-day ventilator-free after extubation, reintubation rate and safety.

Results: MIP increases were 10.8 ± 11.9 cmH2O, 4.5 ± 14.8 cmH2O, and 6.7 ± 14.5 cmH2O for the mixed intensity (MI), low intensity (LI), and high intensity (HI) groups, respectively. There was a non-statistically difference between the MI and LI groups (mean adjusted difference: 6.59, 97.5% CI [- 14.36; 1.18], p = 0.056); there was no difference between the MI and HI groups (mean adjusted difference: - 3.52, 97.5% CI [- 11.57; 4.53], p = 0.321). No significant differences in Ppk increase were observed among the three groups. Weaning success rate observed in MI, HI and LI group were 83.7% [95% CI 69.3; 93.2], 82.6% [95% CI 61.2; 95.0] and 73.9% [95% CI 51.6; 89.8], respectively. MV duration, ICU length of stay and reintubation rate had similar values. Over 629 IMT sessions, six adverse events including four spontaneously reversible bradycardia in LI group were possibly related to the study.

Conclusions: Among difficult-to-wean patients receiving invasive MV, no statistically difference was observed in strength and endurance progression across three different IMT programs. IMT appears to be feasible in usual cares, but some serious adverse events such as bradycardia could motivate further research on the specific impact on cardiac system. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02855619. Registered 28 September 2014.

三种吸气肌训练计划对困难断气的插管和机械通气患者吸气肌力量和耐力的影响:一项多中心随机对照试验。
背景:在重症监护环境中,吸气肌训练(IMT)已被公认为是对抗吸气肌无力的安全选择。它可以改善吸气肌力量并缩短断奶时间,但由于缺乏对最佳训练方案的了解,导致结果不一致。我们提出了一个假设,即同时提高耐力和力量的创新型混合强度计划可能会更有效。我们进行了一项多中心随机对照平行试验,比较三种 IMT 方案(低强度、高强度和混合强度)对难断奶患者吸气肌力和耐力的影响:92名患者被随机分配到三组,每组采用不同的训练方案,从入院到成功拔管或30天内,每周7天,每天两次进行IMT训练。主要结果是最大吸气压力(MIP)增加。次要结果包括作为耐力标志的峰值压力(Ppk)增加、机械通气(MV)持续时间、重症监护室住院时间、拔管后 2 天无呼吸机断奶成功率、再插管率和安全性:混合强度组(MI)、低强度组(LI)和高强度组(HI)的 MIP 增长率分别为 10.8 ± 11.9 cmH2O、4.5 ± 14.8 cmH2O 和 6.7 ± 14.5 cmH2O。混合强度组和低强度组之间无统计学差异(平均调整差异:6.59,97.5% CI [- 14.36; 1.18],p = 0.056);混合强度组和高强度组之间无统计学差异(平均调整差异:- 3.52,97.5% CI [- 11.57; 4.53],p = 0.321)。三组间的 Ppk 升高无明显差异。MI、HI 和 LI 组的断奶成功率分别为 83.7% [95% CI 69.3; 93.2]、82.6% [95% CI 61.2; 95.0] 和 73.9% [95% CI 51.6; 89.8]。中压持续时间、重症监护室住院时间和再插管率的数值相似。在629次IMT治疗过程中,有6次不良事件可能与该研究有关,其中包括LI组的4次自发可逆性心动过缓:结论:在接受有创中风治疗的难断奶患者中,三种不同的 IMT 方案在力量和耐力进展方面没有统计学差异。IMT在常规护理中似乎是可行的,但一些严重的不良事件(如心动过缓)可能促使人们进一步研究其对心脏系统的具体影响。试验注册 Clinicaltrials.gov identifier:NCT02855619。2014年9月28日注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine-Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
1.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Intensive Care" is an open access journal dedicated to the comprehensive coverage of intensive care medicine, providing a platform for the latest research and clinical insights in this critical field. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including intensive and critical care, trauma and surgical intensive care, pediatric intensive care, acute and emergency medicine, perioperative medicine, resuscitation, infection control, and organ dysfunction. Recognizing the importance of cultural diversity in healthcare practices, "Journal of Intensive Care" also encourages submissions that explore and discuss the cultural aspects of intensive care, aiming to promote a more inclusive and culturally sensitive approach to patient care. By fostering a global exchange of knowledge and expertise, the journal contributes to the continuous improvement of intensive care practices worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信