Does extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation improve survival with favorable neurological outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Linda Pagura , Enrico Fabris , Serena Rakar , Marco Gabrielli , Enzo Mazzaro , Gianfranco Sinagra , Davide Stolfo
{"title":"Does extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation improve survival with favorable neurological outcome in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest? A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Linda Pagura ,&nbsp;Enrico Fabris ,&nbsp;Serena Rakar ,&nbsp;Marco Gabrielli ,&nbsp;Enzo Mazzaro ,&nbsp;Gianfranco Sinagra ,&nbsp;Davide Stolfo","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (<em>E</em>-CPR) may improve survival with favorable neurological outcome in patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Unfortunately, recent results from randomized controlled trials were inconclusive. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the impact of <em>E</em>-CPR on neurological outcome compared to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-CPR).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic research for articles assessing outcomes of adult patients with OHCA either treated with <em>E</em>-CPR or C-CPR up to April 27, 2023 was performed. Primary outcome was survival with favorable neurological outcome at discharge or 30 days. Overall survival was also assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Eighteen studies were included. <em>E</em>-CPR was associated with better survival with favorable neurological status at discharge or 30 days (14% vs 7%, OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.61–3.43, <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 80%, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001, NNT = 17) than C-CPR. Results were consistent if the analysis was restricted to RCTs. Overall survival to discharge or 30 days was also positively affected by treatment with <em>E</em>-CPR (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.18–2.46, <em>I</em><sup><em>2</em></sup> = 81%, <em>p</em> = 0.004, NNT = 11).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this meta-analysis, E-CPR had a positive effect on survival with favorable neurological outcome and, to a smaller extent, on overall mortality in patients with refractory OHCA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 154882"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124003691","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) may improve survival with favorable neurological outcome in patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Unfortunately, recent results from randomized controlled trials were inconclusive. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the impact of E-CPR on neurological outcome compared to conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (C-CPR).

Methods

A systematic research for articles assessing outcomes of adult patients with OHCA either treated with E-CPR or C-CPR up to April 27, 2023 was performed. Primary outcome was survival with favorable neurological outcome at discharge or 30 days. Overall survival was also assessed.

Results

Eighteen studies were included. E-CPR was associated with better survival with favorable neurological status at discharge or 30 days (14% vs 7%, OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.61–3.43, I2 = 80%, p < 0.001, NNT = 17) than C-CPR. Results were consistent if the analysis was restricted to RCTs. Overall survival to discharge or 30 days was also positively affected by treatment with E-CPR (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.18–2.46, I2 = 81%, p = 0.004, NNT = 11).

Conclusions

In this meta-analysis, E-CPR had a positive effect on survival with favorable neurological outcome and, to a smaller extent, on overall mortality in patients with refractory OHCA.

体外心肺复苏能否提高院外心脏骤停患者的存活率并改善神经系统预后?系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:体外心肺复苏(E-CPR)可提高难治性院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者的存活率并改善其神经功能预后。遗憾的是,最近的随机对照试验结果尚无定论。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,研究与传统心肺复苏术(C-CPR)相比,E-CPR 对神经功能预后的影响:我们对截至 2023 年 4 月 27 日采用 E-CPR 或 C-CPR 治疗的 OHCA 成人患者的疗效进行了系统研究。主要结果是出院时或 30 天内神经系统结果良好的存活率。同时还评估了总生存率:结果:共纳入了 18 项研究。E-CPR与出院时或30天后神经系统状况良好的存活率相关(14% vs 7%,OR 2.35,95% CI 1.61-3.43,I2 = 80%,P 2 = 81%,P = 0.004,NNT = 11):在这项荟萃分析中,E-CPR 对难治性 OHCA 患者的存活率和良好的神经功能预后有积极影响,对总死亡率的影响较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信