Interpreting the results of rapid molecular diagnostic tests for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infection: current clinical perspective while waiting for further evidence.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Vincenzo Di Pilato, Antonio Vena, Anna Marchese, Matteo Bassetti
{"title":"Interpreting the results of rapid molecular diagnostic tests for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infection: current clinical perspective while waiting for further evidence.","authors":"Daniele Roberto Giacobbe, Vincenzo Di Pilato, Antonio Vena, Anna Marchese, Matteo Bassetti","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2024.2383851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) causing severe infections in humans have represented an important challenge for clinicians worldwide during the past two decades.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Novel β-lactams and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations have led to a shift in the first-line approach to the treatment of severe CRE infections from polymyxin-based regimens to treatment with less toxic agents. This new scenario offers the opportunity to apply rapid molecular diagnostic tests for CRE infection to identify different types of carbapenemases. Herein, the authors provide an overview of this subject and follow it with their expert perspectives.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>When considering studies actually measuring the clinical impact of rapid molecular tests in real-life scenarios, high certainty evidence from randomized controlled trials is still limited and not focused on CRE infections. Nonetheless, it is indisputable that rapid molecular tests have been shown to impact early therapeutic choices (in terms of both escalation and de-escalation) when used in real-life settings, thus issues in the clinical interpretation of their results are already relevant. Overall, increased expertise is required for the appropriate interpretation of rapid molecular tests for personalized antibiotic selection by understanding their strengths and limitations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":"583-590"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2024.2383851","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) causing severe infections in humans have represented an important challenge for clinicians worldwide during the past two decades.

Areas covered: Novel β-lactams and β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations have led to a shift in the first-line approach to the treatment of severe CRE infections from polymyxin-based regimens to treatment with less toxic agents. This new scenario offers the opportunity to apply rapid molecular diagnostic tests for CRE infection to identify different types of carbapenemases. Herein, the authors provide an overview of this subject and follow it with their expert perspectives.

Expert opinion: When considering studies actually measuring the clinical impact of rapid molecular tests in real-life scenarios, high certainty evidence from randomized controlled trials is still limited and not focused on CRE infections. Nonetheless, it is indisputable that rapid molecular tests have been shown to impact early therapeutic choices (in terms of both escalation and de-escalation) when used in real-life settings, thus issues in the clinical interpretation of their results are already relevant. Overall, increased expertise is required for the appropriate interpretation of rapid molecular tests for personalized antibiotic selection by understanding their strengths and limitations.

解读耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌感染快速分子诊断检测的结果:在等待进一步证据的同时从当前临床角度看问题。
简介:过去二十年来,引起人类严重感染的耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌(CRE)已成为全球临床医生面临的重要挑战:新型β-内酰胺类药物和β-内酰胺/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂复方制剂已导致严重CRE感染的一线治疗方法从以多粘菌素为基础的治疗方案转向毒性较低的药物治疗。这种新情况为应用 CRE 感染快速分子诊断检测来识别不同类型的碳青霉烯酶提供了机会。在此,作者对这一主题进行了概述,并提出了自己的专家观点:专家观点:在考虑实际衡量快速分子检测在现实生活中的临床影响的研究时,来自随机对照试验的高确定性证据仍然有限,而且并不侧重于 CRE 感染。尽管如此,在实际应用中,快速分子检测对早期治疗选择(升级和降级)的影响已被证明是不争的事实,因此对其结果的临床解释问题已经具有相关性。总之,需要增加专业知识,通过了解快速分子检测的优势和局限性,为个性化抗生素选择提供适当的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting. Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信