The relationship between tumor immunity and the cGAS–STING pathway in breast cancer: An immunohistochemical study

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Haruto Nishida, Naoto Ohara, Ami Kato, Ryo Kaimori, Yoshihiko Kondo, Takahiro Kusaba, Hiroko Kadowaki, Kazuhiro Kawamura, Tsutomu Daa
{"title":"The relationship between tumor immunity and the cGAS–STING pathway in breast cancer: An immunohistochemical study","authors":"Haruto Nishida,&nbsp;Naoto Ohara,&nbsp;Ami Kato,&nbsp;Ryo Kaimori,&nbsp;Yoshihiko Kondo,&nbsp;Takahiro Kusaba,&nbsp;Hiroko Kadowaki,&nbsp;Kazuhiro Kawamura,&nbsp;Tsutomu Daa","doi":"10.1016/j.yexmp.2024.104917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Breast cancer (BC) is classified into four major histological subtypes, namely luminal A, luminal B, HER2, and basal-like, and its treatment is based on these subtypes. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors against BC depends on the expression of PD-1/PD-L1. Another tumor immune system—the cGAS–STING pathway—is a potential target for cancer immunotherapy. However, the status of the cGAS–STING pathway in BC has not been fully established. Therefore, we investigated the expression status of the cGAS–STING pathway and immune-related proteins in BC. We classified 111 BCs into six groups—29 hormone receptor-positive carcinomas, 12 HER2+ carcinomas (HER2), 8 luminal-HER2 carcinomas, 26 triple-negative breast carcinomas (TNBCs), 21 lobular carcinomas (LC), and 15 carcinomas with apocrine differentiation (CAD)—and investigated the relationship between BC and tumor immunity via the cGAS—STING pathway using histopathological and immunohistochemical methods. Expression of cGAS was high in CADs (100%) and low in TNBCs (35%); STING-positive lymphocytes were high in TNBC (85%, P = 0.0054). Expression of pSTAT3 was significantly high in patients with TNBC (≥10%, 88%). The proportion of PD-L1-positive tumor cells was higher in TNBCs (54%) than in other BCs (30%). SRGN expression was significantly higher in the TNBC group than in the other BC groups (58%). Tumor immune responses may differ among tumor subtypes. The cGAS–STING pathway may be functional in TNBC and CAD but not in LC. Therefore, targeting the cGAS–STING pathway might be useful in BC, particularly TNBC and CAD.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014480024000364/pdfft?md5=450b6bbf42453c850500d83fb35fc25d&pid=1-s2.0-S0014480024000364-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0014480024000364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Breast cancer (BC) is classified into four major histological subtypes, namely luminal A, luminal B, HER2, and basal-like, and its treatment is based on these subtypes. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors against BC depends on the expression of PD-1/PD-L1. Another tumor immune system—the cGAS–STING pathway—is a potential target for cancer immunotherapy. However, the status of the cGAS–STING pathway in BC has not been fully established. Therefore, we investigated the expression status of the cGAS–STING pathway and immune-related proteins in BC. We classified 111 BCs into six groups—29 hormone receptor-positive carcinomas, 12 HER2+ carcinomas (HER2), 8 luminal-HER2 carcinomas, 26 triple-negative breast carcinomas (TNBCs), 21 lobular carcinomas (LC), and 15 carcinomas with apocrine differentiation (CAD)—and investigated the relationship between BC and tumor immunity via the cGAS—STING pathway using histopathological and immunohistochemical methods. Expression of cGAS was high in CADs (100%) and low in TNBCs (35%); STING-positive lymphocytes were high in TNBC (85%, P = 0.0054). Expression of pSTAT3 was significantly high in patients with TNBC (≥10%, 88%). The proportion of PD-L1-positive tumor cells was higher in TNBCs (54%) than in other BCs (30%). SRGN expression was significantly higher in the TNBC group than in the other BC groups (58%). Tumor immune responses may differ among tumor subtypes. The cGAS–STING pathway may be functional in TNBC and CAD but not in LC. Therefore, targeting the cGAS–STING pathway might be useful in BC, particularly TNBC and CAD.

乳腺癌中肿瘤免疫与 cGAS-STING 通路之间的关系:免疫组化研究
乳腺癌(BC)被分为四大组织学亚型,即管腔A型、管腔B型、HER2型和基底样型,其治疗方法也基于这些亚型。对 BC 使用免疫检查点抑制剂取决于 PD-1/PD-L1 的表达。另一种肿瘤免疫系统--cGAS-STING 通路--是癌症免疫疗法的潜在靶点。然而,cGAS-STING通路在BC中的地位尚未完全确定。因此,我们研究了 cGAS-STING 通路和免疫相关蛋白在 BC 中的表达状况。我们将111例BC分为六组--29例激素受体阳性癌、12例HER2+癌(HER2)、8例腔内HER2癌、26例三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)、21例小叶癌(LC)和15例腺垂体分化癌(CAD),并采用组织病理学和免疫组化方法研究了BC通过cGAS-STING通路与肿瘤免疫之间的关系。cGAS在CAD中的表达量较高(100%),而在TNBC中的表达量较低(35%);STING阳性淋巴细胞在TNBC中的表达量较高(85%,P = 0.0054)。pSTAT3 的表达在 TNBC 患者中明显偏高(≥10%,88%)。PD-L1阳性肿瘤细胞在TNBC中的比例(54%)高于其他BC(30%)。TNBC组的SRGN表达明显高于其他BC组(58%)。不同肿瘤亚型的肿瘤免疫反应可能不同。cGAS-STING 通路可能在 TNBC 和 CAD 中起作用,但在 LC 中不起作用。因此,靶向 cGAS-STING 通路可能对 BC(尤其是 TNBC 和 CAD)有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信