Estimation of kidney doses from [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE PRRT using single time point post-treatment SPECT/CT.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Safia Spink, Daniel Gillett, Sarah Heard, Ines Harper, Ruth Casey, Luigi Aloj
{"title":"Estimation of kidney doses from [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE PRRT using single time point post-treatment SPECT/CT.","authors":"Safia Spink, Daniel Gillett, Sarah Heard, Ines Harper, Ruth Casey, Luigi Aloj","doi":"10.1186/s40658-024-00665-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dosimetry after [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy can be demanding for both patients and the clinical service due to the need for imaging at several time points. In this work we compare three methods of single time point (STP) kidney dosimetry after [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy with a multiple time point (MTP) dosimetry method.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Method 1 (MTP): Kidney doses were calculated from 31 patients including 107 therapy cycles. Post-therapy SPECT images were acquired on day 0, 4 and 7 along with a CT scan on day 4. A mono-exponential fit was used to calculate kidney doses using cycle specific data. Method 2 (Consistent effective half-life): The effective half-life [Formula: see text] calculated in cycle 1 was assumed consistent for subsequent cycles of therapy and the activity scaled using a single day 3-5 SPECT/CT. Methods 3 and 4 (Hänscheid and Madsen approximations): The Hänscheid approximation and Madsen approximation were both evaluated using a single SPECT/CT acquired on day 0, 4 and 7. All STP methods were compared to the MTP method for accuracy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the MTP method, mean right and left kidney doses were calculated to be 2.9 ± 1.1 Gy and 2.8 ± 0.9 Gy respectively and the population [Formula: see text] was 56 ± 13 h. For the consistent [Formula: see text], Hänscheid and Madsen methods, the percentage of results within ± 20% of MTP method were 96% (n = 70), 95% (n = 80) and 94% (n = 80) respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All three single time point methods had > 94% of results within ± 20% of the MTP method, however the consistent [Formula: see text] method resulted in the highest alignment with the MTP method and is the only method which allows for calculation of the patient-specific [Formula: see text]. If only a single scan can be performed, day 4 is optimal for kidney dosimetry where the Hänscheid or Madsen approximation can be implemented with good accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11559,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Physics","volume":"11 1","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11272758/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-024-00665-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dosimetry after [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy can be demanding for both patients and the clinical service due to the need for imaging at several time points. In this work we compare three methods of single time point (STP) kidney dosimetry after [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy with a multiple time point (MTP) dosimetry method.

Method: Method 1 (MTP): Kidney doses were calculated from 31 patients including 107 therapy cycles. Post-therapy SPECT images were acquired on day 0, 4 and 7 along with a CT scan on day 4. A mono-exponential fit was used to calculate kidney doses using cycle specific data. Method 2 (Consistent effective half-life): The effective half-life [Formula: see text] calculated in cycle 1 was assumed consistent for subsequent cycles of therapy and the activity scaled using a single day 3-5 SPECT/CT. Methods 3 and 4 (Hänscheid and Madsen approximations): The Hänscheid approximation and Madsen approximation were both evaluated using a single SPECT/CT acquired on day 0, 4 and 7. All STP methods were compared to the MTP method for accuracy.

Results: Using the MTP method, mean right and left kidney doses were calculated to be 2.9 ± 1.1 Gy and 2.8 ± 0.9 Gy respectively and the population [Formula: see text] was 56 ± 13 h. For the consistent [Formula: see text], Hänscheid and Madsen methods, the percentage of results within ± 20% of MTP method were 96% (n = 70), 95% (n = 80) and 94% (n = 80) respectively.

Conclusion: All three single time point methods had > 94% of results within ± 20% of the MTP method, however the consistent [Formula: see text] method resulted in the highest alignment with the MTP method and is the only method which allows for calculation of the patient-specific [Formula: see text]. If only a single scan can be performed, day 4 is optimal for kidney dosimetry where the Hänscheid or Madsen approximation can be implemented with good accuracy.

利用单时间点治疗后 SPECT/CT 估算[177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE PRRT 的肾脏剂量。
背景:由于需要在多个时间点进行成像,[177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE 治疗后的剂量测定对患者和临床服务都有很高的要求。在这项工作中,我们比较了[177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE 治疗后三种单时间点(STP)肾脏剂量测定方法和一种多时间点(MTP)剂量测定方法:方法 1(MTP):计算31名患者(包括107个治疗周期)的肾脏剂量。在第 0、4 和 7 天采集治疗后 SPECT 图像,并在第 4 天进行 CT 扫描。采用单指数拟合法,利用特定周期数据计算肾脏剂量。方法 2(有效半衰期一致):假定第 1 周期计算出的有效半衰期[计算公式:见正文]在随后的治疗周期中保持一致,并使用第 3-5 天的 SPECT/CT 对活性进行缩放。方法 3 和 4(Hänscheid 和 Madsen 近似值):Hänscheid近似法和Madsen近似法均使用在第0、4和7天获得的单次SPECT/CT进行评估。所有 STP 方法都与 MTP 方法的准确性进行了比较:使用 MTP 方法计算出的右肾和左肾平均剂量分别为 2.9 ± 1.1 Gy 和 2.8 ± 0.9 Gy,人群[计算公式:见正文]为 56 ± 13 h。对于一致[计算公式:见正文]、Hänscheid 和 Madsen 方法,结果在 MTP 方法± 20% 范围内的百分比分别为 96% (n = 70)、95% (n = 80) 和 94% (n=80):所有三种单个时间点方法都有大于 94% 的结果在 MTP 方法的 ± 20% 范围内,但一致的[公式:见正文]方法与 MTP 方法的吻合度最高,也是唯一一种可以计算患者特异性[公式:见正文]的方法。如果只能进行一次扫描,那么第 4 天是进行肾脏剂量测定的最佳时间,在这一天可以很准确地使用 Hänscheid 或 Madsen 近似法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EJNMMI Physics
EJNMMI Physics Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EJNMMI Physics is an international platform for scientists, users and adopters of nuclear medicine with a particular interest in physics matters. As a companion journal to the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, this journal has a multi-disciplinary approach and welcomes original materials and studies with a focus on applied physics and mathematics as well as imaging systems engineering and prototyping in nuclear medicine. This includes physics-driven approaches or algorithms supported by physics that foster early clinical adoption of nuclear medicine imaging and therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信