Investigating the relationship between multiple sclerosis disability and driving performance: A comparative study of the multiple sclerosis functional composite and expanded disability status scale

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
{"title":"Investigating the relationship between multiple sclerosis disability and driving performance: A comparative study of the multiple sclerosis functional composite and expanded disability status scale","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Multiple Sclerosis (MS) can affect the ability to perform complex tasks such as driving. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) overlooks cognitive deficits crucial for driving. We investigated the relationship between the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), which includes cognitive assessment, and EDSS in relation to driving performance. Methods: This exploratory study involved 30 MS patients (mean EDSS 2.4 ± 2.0) and 15 healthy controls. We correlated the results of the EDSS, MSFC, and driving performance tests, namely the Two-Hand Coordination Test (2HAND) and the Speed Anticipation Reaction Test (SART).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Patients did not differ from the healthy controls regarding age, sex, and driving experience. However, they exhibited lower mean Z-scores in MSFC, particularly in motor domains, but not in cognitive function. The mean Z-score for the 25-foot Walk test was −0.42 in patients compared to −0.04 in controls. For the 9-hole Peg Test, it was 0.17 in patients versus 1.47 in controls. Patients had a mean total error time of 19.7 seconds for both hands in the 2HAND test, compared to 7.7 seconds in controls. In MS patients, the MSFC and EDSS significantly correlated with SART and 2HAND components. While upper limb function (9-HPT) did not correlate with 2HAND, cognitive function (PASAT) did correlate with the number of 2HAND errors, indicating that cognitive dysfunction impacts driving performance more than physical dysfunction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The MSFC may provide valuable insights into the driving abilities of MS patients, potentially offering advantages over the EDSS in predicting driving performance. Further research with larger, more diverse populations across various driving environments is necessary to validate these findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846724003184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) can affect the ability to perform complex tasks such as driving. The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) overlooks cognitive deficits crucial for driving. We investigated the relationship between the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC), which includes cognitive assessment, and EDSS in relation to driving performance. Methods: This exploratory study involved 30 MS patients (mean EDSS 2.4 ± 2.0) and 15 healthy controls. We correlated the results of the EDSS, MSFC, and driving performance tests, namely the Two-Hand Coordination Test (2HAND) and the Speed Anticipation Reaction Test (SART).

Results

Patients did not differ from the healthy controls regarding age, sex, and driving experience. However, they exhibited lower mean Z-scores in MSFC, particularly in motor domains, but not in cognitive function. The mean Z-score for the 25-foot Walk test was −0.42 in patients compared to −0.04 in controls. For the 9-hole Peg Test, it was 0.17 in patients versus 1.47 in controls. Patients had a mean total error time of 19.7 seconds for both hands in the 2HAND test, compared to 7.7 seconds in controls. In MS patients, the MSFC and EDSS significantly correlated with SART and 2HAND components. While upper limb function (9-HPT) did not correlate with 2HAND, cognitive function (PASAT) did correlate with the number of 2HAND errors, indicating that cognitive dysfunction impacts driving performance more than physical dysfunction.

Conclusion

The MSFC may provide valuable insights into the driving abilities of MS patients, potentially offering advantages over the EDSS in predicting driving performance. Further research with larger, more diverse populations across various driving environments is necessary to validate these findings.

调查多发性硬化症残疾与驾驶表现之间的关系:多发性硬化症功能综合量表与扩大残疾状况量表的比较研究。
导言:多发性硬化症(MS)会影响执行驾驶等复杂任务的能力。扩展残疾状况量表(EDSS)忽略了对驾驶至关重要的认知障碍。我们研究了多发性硬化症功能综合量表(MSFC)(包括认知评估)和 EDSS 与驾驶表现之间的关系: 这项探索性研究涉及 30 名多发性硬化症患者(平均 EDSS 为 2.4 ± 2.0)和 15 名健康对照者。我们将 EDSS、MSFC 和驾驶性能测试(即双手协调测试 (2HAND) 和速度预期反应测试 (SART))的结果进行了关联:结果:在年龄、性别和驾驶经验方面,患者与健康对照组没有差异。但是,他们的 MSFC 平均 Z 值较低,尤其是在运动领域,而在认知功能方面则没有差异。患者在 25 英尺步行测试中的平均 Z 值为-0.42,而对照组为-0.04。在九孔钉测试中,患者的 Z 值为 0.17,而对照组为 1.47。在双手测试中,患者双手的平均总误差时间为 19.7 秒,而对照组为 7.7 秒。在多发性硬化症患者中,MSFC 和 EDSS 与 SART 和 2HAND 成分有明显的相关性。虽然上肢功能(9-HPT)与2HAND无相关性,但认知功能(PASAT)与2HAND错误次数有相关性,这表明认知功能障碍比身体功能障碍对驾驶表现的影响更大:MSFC可为了解多发性硬化症患者的驾驶能力提供有价值的信息,在预测驾驶表现方面可能比EDSS更具优势。为了验证这些研究结果,有必要在各种驾驶环境中对更大规模、更多样化的人群进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信