Protein-Bound Uremic Toxins and Inflammation Process in Hemodialysis Patients: Is There a Role for Adsorption Hemodiafiltration?

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Paolo Fabbrini, Denise Vergani, Anna Malinverno, Federico Pieruzzi, Marita Marengo, Guido Merlotti, Claudio Medana, Alessandro Domenico Quercia, Vincenzo Cantaluppi
{"title":"Protein-Bound Uremic Toxins and Inflammation Process in Hemodialysis Patients: Is There a Role for Adsorption Hemodiafiltration?","authors":"Paolo Fabbrini, Denise Vergani, Anna Malinverno, Federico Pieruzzi, Marita Marengo, Guido Merlotti, Claudio Medana, Alessandro Domenico Quercia, Vincenzo Cantaluppi","doi":"10.1159/000540402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite major advances in the field of dialysis, there are still some unmet needs such as reducing inflammation through adequate depuration. It is well known that the wide spectrum of pro-inflammatory and pro-atherosclerotic uremic toxins are inefficiently removed by current dialysis techniques. Adsorption seems to be an extra tool to remove toxins, but its effect and optimization have not been widely studied. The aim of this report was to present preliminary results regarding the possibility of performing hemodiafiltration with a highly adsorptive polymethylmethacrylate membrane.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was first conducted in 10 patients in which the safety and feasibility of hemodiafiltration with PMMA BG-U 2.1 membrane were tested through measurement of hemolysis indices, transmembrane pressures, and dialysis adequacy. Twenty patients were prospectively observed for 18-month period in which they consecutively underwent standard hemodialysis, standard post-dilution hemodiafiltration, and polymethylmethacrylate-based post-dilution hemodiafiltration. Protein-bound uremic toxins concentrations and inflammatory markers were measured throughout the observed period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HDF-PMMA was inferior to HDF in convective volume, but KT/V was similar, and no differences were noted in operating pressures during the two treatments. During HDF-PMMA period of treatment, we observed a significant reduction of CPR levels, and HDF-PMMA was superior to all other treatments in hepcidin removal even if this did not significantly affect hemoglobin levels. HDF-PMMA could significantly reduce indoxyl sulfate (indoxyl) concentration over a period of 6 months but not for p-cresyl sulfate (p-cresyl).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PMMA BG-U 2.1 membrane can be safely and efficiently used in hemodiafiltration. Moreover, as these preliminary results show, adding adsorption properties to convection and diffusion enabled an increased removal of indoxyl uremic toxin associated to a reduction in inflammation markers as CRP and hepcidin without any negative impact on albumin levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":8953,"journal":{"name":"Blood Purification","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Purification","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540402","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite major advances in the field of dialysis, there are still some unmet needs such as reducing inflammation through adequate depuration. It is well known that the wide spectrum of pro-inflammatory and pro-atherosclerotic uremic toxins are inefficiently removed by current dialysis techniques. Adsorption seems to be an extra tool to remove toxins, but its effect and optimization have not been widely studied. The aim of this report was to present preliminary results regarding the possibility of performing hemodiafiltration with a highly adsorptive polymethylmethacrylate membrane.

Methods: The study was first conducted in 10 patients in which the safety and feasibility of hemodiafiltration with PMMA BG-U 2.1 membrane were tested through measurement of hemolysis indices, transmembrane pressures, and dialysis adequacy. Twenty patients were prospectively observed for 18-month period in which they consecutively underwent standard hemodialysis, standard post-dilution hemodiafiltration, and polymethylmethacrylate-based post-dilution hemodiafiltration. Protein-bound uremic toxins concentrations and inflammatory markers were measured throughout the observed period.

Results: HDF-PMMA was inferior to HDF in convective volume, but KT/V was similar, and no differences were noted in operating pressures during the two treatments. During HDF-PMMA period of treatment, we observed a significant reduction of CPR levels, and HDF-PMMA was superior to all other treatments in hepcidin removal even if this did not significantly affect hemoglobin levels. HDF-PMMA could significantly reduce indoxyl sulfate (indoxyl) concentration over a period of 6 months but not for p-cresyl sulfate (p-cresyl).

Conclusion: PMMA BG-U 2.1 membrane can be safely and efficiently used in hemodiafiltration. Moreover, as these preliminary results show, adding adsorption properties to convection and diffusion enabled an increased removal of indoxyl uremic toxin associated to a reduction in inflammation markers as CRP and hepcidin without any negative impact on albumin levels.

血液透析患者的蛋白结合尿毒症毒素和炎症过程:吸附性血液透析滤过是否有作用?
导言:尽管透析领域取得了重大进展,但仍有一些需求尚未得到满足,例如通过充分净化来减少炎症。众所周知,目前的透析技术无法有效清除各种促炎症和促动脉粥样硬化的尿毒症毒素。吸附似乎是清除毒素的一种额外工具,但其效果和优化尚未得到广泛研究。方法:首先对 10 名患者进行研究,通过测量溶血指数、跨膜压和透析充分性,测试使用 PMMA BG-U 2.1 膜进行血液透析滤过的安全性和可行性。对 20 名患者进行了为期 18 个月的前瞻性观察,对他们连续进行了标准血液透析、标准稀释后血液透析滤过和基于聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯的稀释后血液透析滤过。在整个观察期间测量了蛋白结合尿毒症毒素浓度和炎症指标:结果:HDF PMMA在对流容量方面不如HDF,但KT/V相似,两种治疗期间的工作压力没有差异。在 HDF PMMA 治疗期间,我们观察到 CPR 水平显著下降,HDF PMMA 在清除肝素方面优于所有其他治疗方法,尽管这对血红蛋白水平没有显著影响。HDF PMMA 可在 6 个月内明显降低硫酸吲哚甲酯(Indoxyl)的浓度,但不能降低硫酸对甲酚酯(P-cresyl)的浓度:PMMA BG-U 2.1 膜可安全、高效地用于血液渗滤。此外,正如这些初步结果所显示的,在对流和扩散的基础上增加吸附特性,可提高吲哚基尿毒症毒素的去除率,同时降低 CRP 和肝素等炎症指标,而不会对白蛋白水平产生任何负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Blood Purification
Blood Purification 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.30%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical information on hemodialysis, hemofiltration, peritoneal dialysis and apheresis is featured in this journal. Recognizing the critical importance of equipment and procedures, particular emphasis has been placed on reports, drawn from a wide range of fields, describing technical advances and improvements in methodology. Papers reflect the search for cost-effective solutions which increase not only patient survival but also patient comfort and disease improvement through prevention or correction of undesirable effects. Advances in vascular access and blood anticoagulation, problems associated with exposure of blood to foreign surfaces and acute-care nephrology, including continuous therapies, also receive attention. Nephrologists, internists, intensivists and hospital staff involved in dialysis, apheresis and immunoadsorption for acute and chronic solid organ failure will find this journal useful and informative. ''Blood Purification'' also serves as a platform for multidisciplinary experiences involving nephrologists, cardiologists and critical care physicians in order to expand the level of interaction between different disciplines and specialities.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信