Understanding immune-mediated titanium allergy to in situ orthopaedic implants: a narrative review of the current literature

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Arnold Chen, Andrew P. Kurmis BMBS(Hons), PhD, FRACS
{"title":"Understanding immune-mediated titanium allergy to in situ orthopaedic implants: a narrative review of the current literature","authors":"Arnold Chen,&nbsp;Andrew P. Kurmis BMBS(Hons), PhD, FRACS","doi":"10.1111/ans.19167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical recognition of potential immune-mediated allergic responses to implanted metal devices is increasing. For orthopaedic implants, while ‘pure’ compounds are used in specific circumstances, the majority of components are alloys – a combination of two or more distinct metals. Titanium is found commonly in many orthopaedic devices and is often championed as a ‘hypoallergenic’ option or inclusion. In the absence of a relevant previously published summary on the topic, this paper explores the current state-of-understanding of titanium allergy and proposes a patient management algorithm whereby such immune reactions are clinically-suggested.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A structured, systematic literature review was performed following PRISMA search principles to provide a contemporary summary-of-understanding in this area and to highlight clinical and knowledge deficiencies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-five topic-related articles were identified, the majority reflecting small case series' or proof-of-concept studies. The general standard of scientific evidence available was poor. Justification for arthroplasty utilization of titanium as a ‘hypoallergenic’ option is largely extrapolated from non-orthopaedic domains.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Both ionic and conjugated titanium particles released from implant surfaces have the potential to trigger innate immune responses and true allergy. There exists no simple, high-sensitivity, screening test for titanium allergy. Conventional skin-patch testing is unreliable due to poor dermal penetration. Given established lymphocyte and macrophage activation pathways for allergy responses, in vitro methods using both cell-types show diagnostic promise. Surgical biopsy analysis from host-implant interfaces remains the contemporary ‘gold-standard’, however this represents an invasive, costly and highly-specialized approach not readily available in most settings. Further research to establish reliable/accessible diagnostic methods are indicated.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":"94 11","pages":"1925-1934"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ans.19167","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ans.19167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Clinical recognition of potential immune-mediated allergic responses to implanted metal devices is increasing. For orthopaedic implants, while ‘pure’ compounds are used in specific circumstances, the majority of components are alloys – a combination of two or more distinct metals. Titanium is found commonly in many orthopaedic devices and is often championed as a ‘hypoallergenic’ option or inclusion. In the absence of a relevant previously published summary on the topic, this paper explores the current state-of-understanding of titanium allergy and proposes a patient management algorithm whereby such immune reactions are clinically-suggested.

Methods

A structured, systematic literature review was performed following PRISMA search principles to provide a contemporary summary-of-understanding in this area and to highlight clinical and knowledge deficiencies.

Results

Thirty-five topic-related articles were identified, the majority reflecting small case series' or proof-of-concept studies. The general standard of scientific evidence available was poor. Justification for arthroplasty utilization of titanium as a ‘hypoallergenic’ option is largely extrapolated from non-orthopaedic domains.

Conclusions

Both ionic and conjugated titanium particles released from implant surfaces have the potential to trigger innate immune responses and true allergy. There exists no simple, high-sensitivity, screening test for titanium allergy. Conventional skin-patch testing is unreliable due to poor dermal penetration. Given established lymphocyte and macrophage activation pathways for allergy responses, in vitro methods using both cell-types show diagnostic promise. Surgical biopsy analysis from host-implant interfaces remains the contemporary ‘gold-standard’, however this represents an invasive, costly and highly-specialized approach not readily available in most settings. Further research to establish reliable/accessible diagnostic methods are indicated.

Abstract Image

了解免疫介导的原位矫形植入物钛过敏:现有文献综述。
导言:临床上越来越多地认识到,植入金属装置可能会引起免疫介导的过敏反应。对于骨科植入物而言,虽然在特定情况下会使用 "纯 "化合物,但大多数部件都是合金--两种或两种以上不同金属的组合。钛在许多骨科设备中都很常见,而且经常被作为 "低过敏性 "的选择或包含物。由于以前没有发表过关于该主题的相关摘要,本文探讨了目前对钛过敏的理解,并提出了一种患者管理算法,即临床上建议采用这种免疫反应:方法:按照PRISMA检索原则进行了结构化、系统化的文献综述,以提供该领域的当代理解摘要,并强调临床和知识方面的不足:结果:共发现 35 篇与该主题相关的文章,其中大部分为小型病例系列或概念验证研究。现有科学证据的总体水平较低。将钛作为一种 "低过敏性 "选择用于关节置换术的理由主要是从非矫形外科领域推断出来的:结论:植入物表面释放的离子和共轭钛颗粒都有可能引发先天性免疫反应和真正的过敏。目前还没有简单、高灵敏度的钛过敏筛查试验。由于皮肤穿透力差,传统的皮肤斑块测试并不可靠。鉴于过敏反应的淋巴细胞和巨噬细胞活化途径已经确立,使用这两种细胞类型的体外方法显示出诊断前景。从宿主-种植体界面进行手术活检分析仍然是当代的 "黄金标准",但这是一种侵入性、昂贵且高度专业化的方法,在大多数情况下并不容易获得。需要进一步研究建立可靠/可及的诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信