Arnold Chen, Andrew P. Kurmis BMBS(Hons), PhD, FRACS
{"title":"Understanding immune-mediated titanium allergy to in situ orthopaedic implants: a narrative review of the current literature","authors":"Arnold Chen, Andrew P. Kurmis BMBS(Hons), PhD, FRACS","doi":"10.1111/ans.19167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Clinical recognition of potential immune-mediated allergic responses to implanted metal devices is increasing. For orthopaedic implants, while ‘pure’ compounds are used in specific circumstances, the majority of components are alloys – a combination of two or more distinct metals. Titanium is found commonly in many orthopaedic devices and is often championed as a ‘hypoallergenic’ option or inclusion. In the absence of a relevant previously published summary on the topic, this paper explores the current state-of-understanding of titanium allergy and proposes a patient management algorithm whereby such immune reactions are clinically-suggested.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A structured, systematic literature review was performed following PRISMA search principles to provide a contemporary summary-of-understanding in this area and to highlight clinical and knowledge deficiencies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-five topic-related articles were identified, the majority reflecting small case series' or proof-of-concept studies. The general standard of scientific evidence available was poor. Justification for arthroplasty utilization of titanium as a ‘hypoallergenic’ option is largely extrapolated from non-orthopaedic domains.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Both ionic and conjugated titanium particles released from implant surfaces have the potential to trigger innate immune responses and true allergy. There exists no simple, high-sensitivity, screening test for titanium allergy. Conventional skin-patch testing is unreliable due to poor dermal penetration. Given established lymphocyte and macrophage activation pathways for allergy responses, in vitro methods using both cell-types show diagnostic promise. Surgical biopsy analysis from host-implant interfaces remains the contemporary ‘gold-standard’, however this represents an invasive, costly and highly-specialized approach not readily available in most settings. Further research to establish reliable/accessible diagnostic methods are indicated.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":"94 11","pages":"1925-1934"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ans.19167","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ans.19167","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Clinical recognition of potential immune-mediated allergic responses to implanted metal devices is increasing. For orthopaedic implants, while ‘pure’ compounds are used in specific circumstances, the majority of components are alloys – a combination of two or more distinct metals. Titanium is found commonly in many orthopaedic devices and is often championed as a ‘hypoallergenic’ option or inclusion. In the absence of a relevant previously published summary on the topic, this paper explores the current state-of-understanding of titanium allergy and proposes a patient management algorithm whereby such immune reactions are clinically-suggested.
Methods
A structured, systematic literature review was performed following PRISMA search principles to provide a contemporary summary-of-understanding in this area and to highlight clinical and knowledge deficiencies.
Results
Thirty-five topic-related articles were identified, the majority reflecting small case series' or proof-of-concept studies. The general standard of scientific evidence available was poor. Justification for arthroplasty utilization of titanium as a ‘hypoallergenic’ option is largely extrapolated from non-orthopaedic domains.
Conclusions
Both ionic and conjugated titanium particles released from implant surfaces have the potential to trigger innate immune responses and true allergy. There exists no simple, high-sensitivity, screening test for titanium allergy. Conventional skin-patch testing is unreliable due to poor dermal penetration. Given established lymphocyte and macrophage activation pathways for allergy responses, in vitro methods using both cell-types show diagnostic promise. Surgical biopsy analysis from host-implant interfaces remains the contemporary ‘gold-standard’, however this represents an invasive, costly and highly-specialized approach not readily available in most settings. Further research to establish reliable/accessible diagnostic methods are indicated.
期刊介绍:
ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.