Anesthesia for Patients With the Centrifugal-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Content Validity Assessment.

Q3 Medicine
AANA journal Pub Date : 2024-08-01
Sarah M Srour, Margaret Contrera, Lee Anne Siegmund
{"title":"Anesthesia for Patients With the Centrifugal-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices: A Content Validity Assessment.","authors":"Sarah M Srour, Margaret Contrera, Lee Anne Siegmund","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Safely anesthetizing patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) can be intimidating, particularly for novice anesthesia providers. Given the variety of complex issues anesthesia providers may encounter with patients, it would be impractical to expect expertise in every population. To combat the inevitable loss of knowledge, education experts recommend active learning techniques, including test-enhanced learning, active recall, and spaced repetition. To that end, this research team created an LVAD Assessment for Anesthesia, or LAmA tool, to be evaluated for content validity by eight experts. The LAmA tool and content validity assessment were distributed to two anesthesiologists and four nurse anesthetists in the cardiothoracic anesthesia department at a hospital in Northeast Ohio, as well as to two outside nursing research experts. Results were analyzed by the research team and the content validity index (CVI) was determined. A CVI of at least 0.875 was required for the tool to be valid, and final scores in the categories of relevance, clarity, and importance were all ≥ 0.9. The data from the validated tool were used to create a pocket reference on LVAD anesthetic management. Both educational assessments and pocket references have the potential to positively impact knowledge retention and patient outcomes, making them excellent clinical resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":7104,"journal":{"name":"AANA journal","volume":"92 4","pages":"295-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AANA journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Safely anesthetizing patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) can be intimidating, particularly for novice anesthesia providers. Given the variety of complex issues anesthesia providers may encounter with patients, it would be impractical to expect expertise in every population. To combat the inevitable loss of knowledge, education experts recommend active learning techniques, including test-enhanced learning, active recall, and spaced repetition. To that end, this research team created an LVAD Assessment for Anesthesia, or LAmA tool, to be evaluated for content validity by eight experts. The LAmA tool and content validity assessment were distributed to two anesthesiologists and four nurse anesthetists in the cardiothoracic anesthesia department at a hospital in Northeast Ohio, as well as to two outside nursing research experts. Results were analyzed by the research team and the content validity index (CVI) was determined. A CVI of at least 0.875 was required for the tool to be valid, and final scores in the categories of relevance, clarity, and importance were all ≥ 0.9. The data from the validated tool were used to create a pocket reference on LVAD anesthetic management. Both educational assessments and pocket references have the potential to positively impact knowledge retention and patient outcomes, making them excellent clinical resources.

离心流左心室辅助装置患者的麻醉:内容有效性评估。
对使用左心室辅助装置(LVAD)的患者进行安全麻醉可能令人望而生畏,尤其是对麻醉新手而言。鉴于麻醉提供者可能会遇到患者的各种复杂问题,期望他们在每个人群中都具备专业知识是不切实际的。为了应对不可避免的知识损失,教育专家建议采用主动学习技术,包括测试强化学习、主动回忆和间隔重复。为此,本研究小组创建了一个 LVAD 麻醉评估工具,由八位专家对其内容有效性进行评估。LAmA工具和内容有效性评估结果已分发给俄亥俄州东北部一家医院心胸麻醉科的两名麻醉师和四名麻醉护士,以及两名外部护理研究专家。研究小组对结果进行了分析,并确定了内容效度指数(CVI)。该工具的有效性要求 CVI 至少达到 0.875,相关性、清晰度和重要性类别的最终得分均≥ 0.9。来自验证工具的数据被用于创建 LVAD 麻醉管理袖珍参考书。教育评估和袖珍参考书都有可能对知识保留和患者预后产生积极影响,因此是极好的临床资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AANA journal
AANA journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
期刊介绍: Founded in 1931 and located in Park Ridge, Ill., the AANA is the professional organization for more than 90 percent of the nation’s nurse anesthetists. As advanced practice nurses, CRNAs administer approximately 32 million anesthetics in the United States each year. CRNAs practice in every setting where anesthesia is available and are the sole anesthesia providers in more than two-thirds of all rural hospitals. They administer every type of anesthetic, and provide care for every type of surgery or procedure, from open heart to cataract to pain management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书