Altered Abdominal Muscle Recruitment and Declined Physical Function in Postpartum Individuals With Pregnancy-Related Pelvic Girdle Pain: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Sze Chee Chua, Meng-Hsing Wu, Yi-Liang Kuo, Kuan-Yin Lin, Yi-Ju Tsai
{"title":"Altered Abdominal Muscle Recruitment and Declined Physical Function in Postpartum Individuals With Pregnancy-Related Pelvic Girdle Pain: A Matched Case-Control Study.","authors":"Sze Chee Chua, Meng-Hsing Wu, Yi-Liang Kuo, Kuan-Yin Lin, Yi-Ju Tsai","doi":"10.1111/jmwh.13673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The influence of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) on lumbopelvic muscles has not been comprehensively examined in postpartum individuals. Previous research also presented self-reported activity limitations without objective measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty postpartum individuals with PPGP (PPGP group) and 30 age-, parity-, and postpartum duration-matched asymptomatic individuals (healthy group) were recruited. Transabdominal ultrasonography was used to measure muscle thickness or activation changes of the external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO), transverse abdominals, lumbar multifidus, and pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) during rest and while performing the active straight leg raise (ASLR). Muscle changes were compared separately in the painful and nonpainful sides between the PPGP and health control group. Physical function was assessed using the ASLR fatigue (ASLRF), timed up-and-go, and 6-m walking (6MW) tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PPGP group had greater thickening changes in the bilateral IO during ASLR compared with the healthy group (nonpainful side, 16.34 vs 3.52 mm; P = .010; painful side, 18.83 vs 6.60 mm; P = .02) but became thinner in the EO (nonpainful side, -2.19 vs 19.97 mm; P < .001; painful side, -5.97 vs 21.43 mm; P < .001). Thicker IO and EO on the nonpainful side (IO, 6.60 vs 5.78 mm; P = .004; EO, 5.37 vs 4.54 mm; P = .011) and a lower bladder base (indication of PFMs) (91.87 vs 78.61 mm; P = .002) during rest were also observed in the PPGP group. Furthermore, the performance of the ASLRF and 6MW tests was poorer in the PPGP than in the healthy group (ASLRF nonpainful side, 82.36 vs 59.09 sec; P = .01; painful side, 75.73 vs 59.26 sec; P = .04; 6MW, 3.48 vs 3.17 sec; P = .02).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Postpartum individuals with PPGP demonstrated altered abdominal muscle recruitment strategies during loading tasks, with objectively impaired physical functions. These findings are critical for developing effective muscle training interventions for PPGP.</p>","PeriodicalId":94094,"journal":{"name":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of midwifery & women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The influence of pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPGP) on lumbopelvic muscles has not been comprehensively examined in postpartum individuals. Previous research also presented self-reported activity limitations without objective measures.

Methods: Thirty postpartum individuals with PPGP (PPGP group) and 30 age-, parity-, and postpartum duration-matched asymptomatic individuals (healthy group) were recruited. Transabdominal ultrasonography was used to measure muscle thickness or activation changes of the external oblique (EO), internal oblique (IO), transverse abdominals, lumbar multifidus, and pelvic floor muscles (PFMs) during rest and while performing the active straight leg raise (ASLR). Muscle changes were compared separately in the painful and nonpainful sides between the PPGP and health control group. Physical function was assessed using the ASLR fatigue (ASLRF), timed up-and-go, and 6-m walking (6MW) tests.

Results: The PPGP group had greater thickening changes in the bilateral IO during ASLR compared with the healthy group (nonpainful side, 16.34 vs 3.52 mm; P = .010; painful side, 18.83 vs 6.60 mm; P = .02) but became thinner in the EO (nonpainful side, -2.19 vs 19.97 mm; P < .001; painful side, -5.97 vs 21.43 mm; P < .001). Thicker IO and EO on the nonpainful side (IO, 6.60 vs 5.78 mm; P = .004; EO, 5.37 vs 4.54 mm; P = .011) and a lower bladder base (indication of PFMs) (91.87 vs 78.61 mm; P = .002) during rest were also observed in the PPGP group. Furthermore, the performance of the ASLRF and 6MW tests was poorer in the PPGP than in the healthy group (ASLRF nonpainful side, 82.36 vs 59.09 sec; P = .01; painful side, 75.73 vs 59.26 sec; P = .04; 6MW, 3.48 vs 3.17 sec; P = .02).

Discussion: Postpartum individuals with PPGP demonstrated altered abdominal muscle recruitment strategies during loading tasks, with objectively impaired physical functions. These findings are critical for developing effective muscle training interventions for PPGP.

与妊娠相关的骨盆腰部疼痛的产后患者腹肌募集改变和身体功能下降:一项匹配病例对照研究。
简介:与妊娠相关的骨盆腰部疼痛(PPGP)对产后患者腰椎骨盆肌肉的影响尚未得到全面研究。以前的研究也只提供了自我报告的活动限制,而没有客观的测量方法:方法:招募了 30 名患有 PPGP 的产后患者(PPGP 组)和 30 名年龄、胎次和产后持续时间匹配的无症状患者(健康组)。采用经腹超声波检查法测量患者在休息时和进行主动直腿抬高(ASLR)时腹外斜肌(EO)、腹内斜肌(IO)、腹横肌、腰多裂肌和骨盆底肌(PFMs)的肌肉厚度或激活变化。分别比较了 PPGP 组和健康对照组疼痛侧和非疼痛侧的肌肉变化。身体功能通过 ASLR 疲劳(ASLRF)、定时起立行走和 6 米步行(6MW)测试进行评估:结果:与健康组相比,PPGP 组在 ASLR 期间双侧 IO 的增厚变化更大(非疼痛侧,16.34 vs 3.52 mm;P = .010;疼痛侧,18.83 vs 6.60 mm;P = .02),但 EO 变薄(非疼痛侧,-2.19 vs 19.97 mm;P 讨论:产后 PPGP 患者在完成负荷任务时腹部肌肉募集策略发生了改变,客观上损害了身体功能。这些发现对于制定有效的 PPGP 肌肉训练干预措施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信