Pitfalls in Interpretive Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Radiology.

Abstract

Interpretive artificial intelligence (AI) tools are poised to change the future of radiology. However, certain pitfalls may pose particular challenges for optimal AI interpretative performance. These include anatomic variants, age-related changes, postoperative changes, medical devices, image artifacts, lack of integration of prior and concurrent imaging examinations and clinical information, as well as the satisfaction-of-search effect. Model training and development should account for such pitfalls, to minimize errors and optimize interpretation accuracy. More broadly, AI algorithms should be exposed to diverse and complex training data sets, to yield a holistic interpretation that considers all relevant information beyond the individual examination. Successful clinical deployment of AI tools will require that radiologist end-users recognize these pitfalls and other limitations of the available models. Furthermore, developers should incorporate explainable AI techniques (e.g., heat maps) into their tools, to improve radiologists' understanding of model outputs and to enable radiologists to provide feedback for guiding continuous learning and iterative refinement. In this article, we provide an overview of common pitfalls that radiologists may encounter when using interpretive AI products in daily practice. We present how such pitfalls lead to AI errors and offer potential strategies that AI developers may use for their mitigation.