Implementation of a pharmacogenetic panel-based test for pharmacotherapy-based supportive care in an adult oncology clinic

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Emily J. Cicali, Elizabeth Eddy, Yan Gong, Amanda L. Elchynski, Kim Pena del Aguila, Tala Basha, Karen C. Daily, Lauren Dickson, Steven Fischer, Erin Hastings-Monari, Dennie Jones Jr., Brian H. Ramnaraign, David L. DeRemer, Thomas J. George, Rhonda M. Cooper-DeHoff
{"title":"Implementation of a pharmacogenetic panel-based test for pharmacotherapy-based supportive care in an adult oncology clinic","authors":"Emily J. Cicali,&nbsp;Elizabeth Eddy,&nbsp;Yan Gong,&nbsp;Amanda L. Elchynski,&nbsp;Kim Pena del Aguila,&nbsp;Tala Basha,&nbsp;Karen C. Daily,&nbsp;Lauren Dickson,&nbsp;Steven Fischer,&nbsp;Erin Hastings-Monari,&nbsp;Dennie Jones Jr.,&nbsp;Brian H. Ramnaraign,&nbsp;David L. DeRemer,&nbsp;Thomas J. George,&nbsp;Rhonda M. Cooper-DeHoff","doi":"10.1111/cts.13890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The University of Florida Health conducted a pragmatic implementation of a pharmacogenetics (PGx) panel-based test to guide medications used for supportive care prescribed to patients undergoing chemotherapy. The implementation was in the context of a pragmatic clinical trial for patients with non-hematologic cancers being treated with chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to either the intervention arm or control arm and received PGx testing immediately or at the end of the study, respectively. Patients completed the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) to assess quality of life (QoL). A total of 150 patients received PGx testing and enrolled in the study. Clinical decision support and implementation infrastructure were developed. While the study was originally planned for 500 patients, we were underpowered in our sample of 150 patients to test differences in the patient-reported MDASI scores. We did observed a high completion rate (92%) of the questionnaires; however, there were few medication changes (<i>n</i> = 6 in the intervention arm) based on PGx test results. Despite this, we learned several lessons through this pragmatic implementation of a PGx panel-based test in an outpatient oncology setting. Most notably, patients were less willing to undergo PGx testing if the cost of the test exceeded $100. In addition, to enhance PGx implementation success, reoccurring provider education is necessary, clinical decision support needs to appear in a more conducive way to fit in with oncologists' workflow, and PGx test results need to be available earlier in treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11267631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.13890","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The University of Florida Health conducted a pragmatic implementation of a pharmacogenetics (PGx) panel-based test to guide medications used for supportive care prescribed to patients undergoing chemotherapy. The implementation was in the context of a pragmatic clinical trial for patients with non-hematologic cancers being treated with chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to either the intervention arm or control arm and received PGx testing immediately or at the end of the study, respectively. Patients completed the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) to assess quality of life (QoL). A total of 150 patients received PGx testing and enrolled in the study. Clinical decision support and implementation infrastructure were developed. While the study was originally planned for 500 patients, we were underpowered in our sample of 150 patients to test differences in the patient-reported MDASI scores. We did observed a high completion rate (92%) of the questionnaires; however, there were few medication changes (n = 6 in the intervention arm) based on PGx test results. Despite this, we learned several lessons through this pragmatic implementation of a PGx panel-based test in an outpatient oncology setting. Most notably, patients were less willing to undergo PGx testing if the cost of the test exceeded $100. In addition, to enhance PGx implementation success, reoccurring provider education is necessary, clinical decision support needs to appear in a more conducive way to fit in with oncologists' workflow, and PGx test results need to be available earlier in treatment planning.

Abstract Image

在成人肿瘤诊所实施基于药物治疗的支持性护理的药物基因小组测试。
佛罗里达大学健康中心开展了一项基于药物遗传学(PGx)面板的实用化试验,以指导化疗患者的支持性治疗用药。该试验是在一项针对接受化疗的非血癌患者的实用临床试验背景下实施的。患者被随机分配到干预组或对照组,分别立即或在研究结束时接受 PGx 检测。患者填写MD安德森症状量表(MDASI)以评估生活质量(QoL)。共有 150 名患者接受了 PGx 检测并加入了研究。开发了临床决策支持和实施基础设施。虽然研究原计划针对 500 名患者,但我们的 150 名患者样本不足以测试患者报告的 MDASI 评分差异。我们确实观察到了较高的问卷完成率(92%);但是,根据 PGx 测试结果进行的药物更换却很少(干预组为 6 例)。尽管如此,我们还是从这次在门诊肿瘤环境中基于 PGx 面板测试的实用实施中学到了几条经验。最值得注意的是,如果检测费用超过 100 美元,患者接受 PGx 检测的意愿就会降低。此外,为了提高 PGx 实施的成功率,有必要对医疗服务提供者进行经常性的教育,临床决策支持需要以更有利的方式出现,以适应肿瘤学家的工作流程,而且 PGx 检测结果需要在治疗计划的早期提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信