Total mesorectal excision after rectal-sparing approach in locally advanced rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant treatment: a high volume center experience.

IF 3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Pub Date : 2024-06-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26317745241231098
Daniela Rega, Vincenza Granata, Carmela Romano, Roberta Fusco, Alessia Aversano, Vincenzo Ravo, Antonella Petrillo, Biagio Pecori, Elena Di Girolamo, Fabiana Tatangelo, Antonio Avallone, Paolo Delrio
{"title":"Total mesorectal excision after rectal-sparing approach in locally advanced rectal cancer patients after neoadjuvant treatment: a high volume center experience.","authors":"Daniela Rega, Vincenza Granata, Carmela Romano, Roberta Fusco, Alessia Aversano, Vincenzo Ravo, Antonella Petrillo, Biagio Pecori, Elena Di Girolamo, Fabiana Tatangelo, Antonio Avallone, Paolo Delrio","doi":"10.1177/26317745241231098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patient with a complete or near-complete clinical response after neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, the organ-sparing approach [watch & wait (W&W) or local excision (LE)] is a possible alternative to major rectal resection. Although, in case of local recurrence or regrowth, after these treatments, a total mesorectal excision (TME) can be operated.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this retrospective study, we selected 120 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who had a complete or near-complete clinical response after neoadjuvant treatment, from June 2011 to June 2021. Among them, 41 patients were managed by W&W approach, whereas 79 patients were managed by LE. Twenty-three patients underwent salvage TME for an unfavorable histology after LE (11 patients) or a local recurrence/regrowth (seven patients in LE group - five patients in W&W group), with a median follow-up of 42 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following salvage TME, no patients died within 30 days; serious adverse events occurred in four patients; 8 (34.8%) patients had a definitive stoma; 8 (34.8%) patients undergone to major surgery for unfavorable histology after LE - a complete response was confirmed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Notably active surveillance after rectal sparing allows prompt identifying signs of regrowth or relapse leading to a radical TME. Rectal sparing is a possible strategy for LARC patients although an active surveillance is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":40947,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","volume":"17 ","pages":"26317745241231098"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265235/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26317745241231098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In patient with a complete or near-complete clinical response after neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, the organ-sparing approach [watch & wait (W&W) or local excision (LE)] is a possible alternative to major rectal resection. Although, in case of local recurrence or regrowth, after these treatments, a total mesorectal excision (TME) can be operated.

Method: In this retrospective study, we selected 120 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who had a complete or near-complete clinical response after neoadjuvant treatment, from June 2011 to June 2021. Among them, 41 patients were managed by W&W approach, whereas 79 patients were managed by LE. Twenty-three patients underwent salvage TME for an unfavorable histology after LE (11 patients) or a local recurrence/regrowth (seven patients in LE group - five patients in W&W group), with a median follow-up of 42 months.

Results: Following salvage TME, no patients died within 30 days; serious adverse events occurred in four patients; 8 (34.8%) patients had a definitive stoma; 8 (34.8%) patients undergone to major surgery for unfavorable histology after LE - a complete response was confirmed.

Conclusion: Notably active surveillance after rectal sparing allows prompt identifying signs of regrowth or relapse leading to a radical TME. Rectal sparing is a possible strategy for LARC patients although an active surveillance is necessary.

新辅助治疗后局部晚期直肠癌患者在保肛方法后进行全直肠系膜切除术:高容量中心的经验。
背景:对于局部晚期直肠癌新辅助治疗后临床反应完全或接近完全的患者,保留器官的方法[观察和等待(W&W)或局部切除(LE)]是直肠大部切除术的可能替代方案。不过,在这些治疗方法之后,如果出现局部复发或再生,可以进行全直肠系膜切除术(TME):在这项回顾性研究中,我们选取了 2011 年 6 月至 2021 年 6 月间 120 例经新辅助治疗后获得完全或接近完全临床反应的局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)患者。其中,41名患者采用W&W方法,79名患者采用LE方法。23例患者在LE治疗后因组织学结果不佳(11例)或局部复发/增生(LE组7例,W&W组5例)接受了TME挽救治疗,中位随访时间为42个月:结果:抢救性TME治疗后,没有患者在30天内死亡;4名患者出现严重不良反应;8名(34.8%)患者有明确的造口;8名(34.8%)患者在LE术后因组织学检查结果不佳而接受了大手术--确认了完全反应:值得注意的是,直肠切除术后的积极监测可以及时发现肿瘤生长或复发的迹象,从而导致根治性肿瘤切除术。对 LARC 患者来说,保留直肠是一种可行的策略,但必须进行积极的监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信