Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Recombinant Human Endostatin (Endostar) Combined With Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A 2-Center Retrospective Study.
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Recombinant Human Endostatin (Endostar) Combined With Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A 2-Center Retrospective Study.","authors":"Yue Feng, Xin Li, Fei Sun, Juying Zhou, Lili Wang, Hongwei Zeng, Jingping Yu","doi":"10.1177/15330338241263026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of Endostar in the management of locally advanced cervical cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, 2-center study enrolled 41 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer between June 2017 and December 2020. The patients were subjected to a combination of Endostar and chemoradiotherapy until they experienced disease progression or an unacceptable level of toxicity. The patients in the Endostar combined chemoradiotherapy (E + CRT) and CRT groups were matched 1:1 based on clinical features, including age, disease stage, and pathological type. The therapeutic efficacy and safety outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Early treatment response: the CR rates in E + CRT and CRT groups were 48.8% and 26.8%, respectively (<i>χ</i><sup>2</sup> = 4.20, <i>P </i>< .05). The ORR and DCR were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Long-term efficacy: there was no significant difference in the 1-year and 2-year PFS rates and OS rates between 2 groups. However, in patients with stage IIB, subgroup analyses revealed a significant difference in PFS between the 2 groups (<i>P </i>< .05). Prognostic factors: stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, and tumor size were independent predictive factors for PFS, while ECOG score and tumor size were those of OS in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Safety: The incidence of grade III-IV myelosuppression was significantly lower in E + CRT group than in CRT group (<i>P </i>< .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of Endostar and concurrent CRT exhibited greater efficacy in treating locally advanced cervical cancer with no severe adverse reactions, when compared to simple CRT. It is expected that this approach will evolve into a new treatment alternative for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":22203,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","volume":"23 ","pages":"15330338241263026"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11271135/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338241263026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of Endostar in the management of locally advanced cervical cancer.
Methods: This retrospective, 2-center study enrolled 41 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer between June 2017 and December 2020. The patients were subjected to a combination of Endostar and chemoradiotherapy until they experienced disease progression or an unacceptable level of toxicity. The patients in the Endostar combined chemoradiotherapy (E + CRT) and CRT groups were matched 1:1 based on clinical features, including age, disease stage, and pathological type. The therapeutic efficacy and safety outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.
Results: Early treatment response: the CR rates in E + CRT and CRT groups were 48.8% and 26.8%, respectively (χ2 = 4.20, P < .05). The ORR and DCR were not significantly different between the 2 groups. Long-term efficacy: there was no significant difference in the 1-year and 2-year PFS rates and OS rates between 2 groups. However, in patients with stage IIB, subgroup analyses revealed a significant difference in PFS between the 2 groups (P < .05). Prognostic factors: stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, and tumor size were independent predictive factors for PFS, while ECOG score and tumor size were those of OS in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Safety: The incidence of grade III-IV myelosuppression was significantly lower in E + CRT group than in CRT group (P < .05).
Conclusions: The combination of Endostar and concurrent CRT exhibited greater efficacy in treating locally advanced cervical cancer with no severe adverse reactions, when compared to simple CRT. It is expected that this approach will evolve into a new treatment alternative for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.
背景:本研究旨在评估 Endostar 治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的有效性和安全性:本研究旨在评估Endostar治疗局部晚期宫颈癌的有效性和安全性:这项回顾性、2个中心的研究在2017年6月至2020年12月期间招募了41名局部晚期宫颈癌患者。这些患者接受了Endostar和化疗放疗的联合治疗,直至疾病进展或出现不可接受的毒性反应。Endostar联合化放疗(E+CRT)组和CRT组的患者根据年龄、疾病分期和病理类型等临床特征进行1:1配对。比较两组患者的疗效和安全性:早期治疗反应:E+CRT组和CRT组的CR率分别为48.8%和26.8%(χ2=4.20,P P P P 结论:E+CRT组的CR率高于CRT组:与单纯 CRT 相比,Endostar 和同期 CRT 联合治疗局部晚期宫颈癌疗效更佳,且无严重不良反应。预计这种方法将成为局部晚期宫颈癌患者的一种新的治疗选择。
期刊介绍:
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment (TCRT) is a JCR-ranked, broad-spectrum, open access, peer-reviewed publication whose aim is to provide researchers and clinicians with a platform to share and discuss developments in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of cancer.