Comparing the Use of Crotaline-Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine) Versus Observation in Children.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Stephen Rohl, Mark Meredith, Tucker Anderson, Alexander Clark, Mark Snider, Rebecca Bruccoleri, Saralyn Williams, Tristan Hayes, Elizabeth Tolley, Andrew J Gienapp, Donna Seger
{"title":"Comparing the Use of Crotaline-Polyvalent Immune Fab (Ovine) Versus Observation in Children.","authors":"Stephen Rohl, Mark Meredith, Tucker Anderson, Alexander Clark, Mark Snider, Rebecca Bruccoleri, Saralyn Williams, Tristan Hayes, Elizabeth Tolley, Andrew J Gienapp, Donna Seger","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In the United States, studies are inconclusive regarding the indications for polyvalent antivenom administration for crotaline envenomation. We compared polyvalent antivenom administration versus observation used at 2 separate institutions. We hypothesized that deferring antivenom leads to increased hospital length of stay and surgical interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective chart review of children who presented to Le Bonheur Children's Hospital (LBCH) in Memphis, Tennessee, and Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt (MCJCHV) in Nashville, Tennessee, from 2009 to 2021. Patient demographics, treatment utilization, bite location, and outcomes from both sites were statistically examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 183 patients met the inclusion criteria (123 at LBCH, 60 at MCJCHV). At LBCH, mean age was 9.2 years, 54% were male, and 79% of known snakes identified as copperheads. At MCJCHV, mean age was 8.9 years, 65% were male, and 88% of known snakes identified as copperheads. The most commonly envenomated areas for both sites were the foot (42%), hand (27%), and ankle (26%). Patients at LBCH were managed with antivenom only 25% of the time, whereas 75% were observed; 82% of MCJCHV patients were managed with antivenom (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in length of stay (mean, 1.5 days at LBCH and 1.8 days at MCJCHV; P = 0.136) or surgical intervention (3.3% of LBCH encounters, 5.0% of MCJCHV encounters; P = 0.685). Secondary outcomes aside from coagulopathy and admission location (intensive care unit vs floor) were also not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of antivenom did not impact hospital length of stay or surgical interventions. Our results should be interpreted cautiously as our study reflects regional experiences with snake species in the Southeast United States and not North America as a whole. Other institutional differences in management and smaller n at MCJCHV may have contributed to different outcomes. Further study is needed to determine intermediate and long-term effects of deferring antivenom use.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In the United States, studies are inconclusive regarding the indications for polyvalent antivenom administration for crotaline envenomation. We compared polyvalent antivenom administration versus observation used at 2 separate institutions. We hypothesized that deferring antivenom leads to increased hospital length of stay and surgical interventions.

Methods: Retrospective chart review of children who presented to Le Bonheur Children's Hospital (LBCH) in Memphis, Tennessee, and Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt (MCJCHV) in Nashville, Tennessee, from 2009 to 2021. Patient demographics, treatment utilization, bite location, and outcomes from both sites were statistically examined.

Results: A total of 183 patients met the inclusion criteria (123 at LBCH, 60 at MCJCHV). At LBCH, mean age was 9.2 years, 54% were male, and 79% of known snakes identified as copperheads. At MCJCHV, mean age was 8.9 years, 65% were male, and 88% of known snakes identified as copperheads. The most commonly envenomated areas for both sites were the foot (42%), hand (27%), and ankle (26%). Patients at LBCH were managed with antivenom only 25% of the time, whereas 75% were observed; 82% of MCJCHV patients were managed with antivenom (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in length of stay (mean, 1.5 days at LBCH and 1.8 days at MCJCHV; P = 0.136) or surgical intervention (3.3% of LBCH encounters, 5.0% of MCJCHV encounters; P = 0.685). Secondary outcomes aside from coagulopathy and admission location (intensive care unit vs floor) were also not significant.

Conclusions: The use of antivenom did not impact hospital length of stay or surgical interventions. Our results should be interpreted cautiously as our study reflects regional experiences with snake species in the Southeast United States and not North America as a whole. Other institutional differences in management and smaller n at MCJCHV may have contributed to different outcomes. Further study is needed to determine intermediate and long-term effects of deferring antivenom use.

比较在儿童中使用巴豆碱多价免疫球蛋白(牛)与观察法。
目的:在美国,关于黄花鱼毒中毒的多价抗蛇毒血清给药适应症的研究尚无定论。我们比较了两家不同机构使用的多价抗蛇毒血清与观察法。我们假设,推迟注射抗蛇毒血清会导致住院时间和手术干预增加:对 2009 年至 2021 年期间在田纳西州孟菲斯 Le Bonheur 儿童医院 (LBCH) 和田纳西州纳什维尔 Monroe Carell Jr 儿童医院 (MCJCHV) 就诊的儿童进行回顾性病历审查。我们对两家医院的患者人口统计学特征、治疗使用情况、咬合位置和结果进行了统计研究:共有183名患者符合纳入标准(枸杞医院123人,MCJCHV医院60人)。在雷曼医院,患者平均年龄为 9.2 岁,54% 为男性,79% 的已知蛇类被鉴定为铜头蛇。在 MCJCHV,蛇的平均年龄为 8.9 岁,65% 为雄性,88% 的已知蛇被鉴定为铜头蛇。两地最常被蛇咬伤的部位分别是脚(42%)、手(27%)和脚踝(26%)。枸杞医院只有 25% 的患者接受了抗蛇毒血清治疗,而观察到的比例为 75%;而 MCJCHV 患者中有 82% 接受了抗蛇毒血清治疗(P < 0.001)。在住院时间(雷曼兄弟医院平均为 1.5 天,麻省总医院平均为 1.8 天;P = 0.136)或手术干预(雷曼兄弟医院为 3.3%,麻省总医院为 5.0%;P = 0.685)方面没有明显差异。除凝血功能障碍和入院地点(重症监护室与病房)外,其他次要结果也无显著性差异:使用抗蛇毒血清不会影响住院时间或手术干预。由于我们的研究反映的是美国东南部而非整个北美地区在蛇类方面的经验,因此应谨慎解释我们的结果。其他机构在管理上的差异和 MCJCHV 较小的病例数可能会导致不同的结果。需要进一步研究以确定推迟使用抗蛇毒血清的中期和长期效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信