Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Transmural Biliary Drainage With 6 mm and 8 mm Cautery-enhanced Lumen-apposing Metal Stents: A Multicenter Collaborative Study.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Daryl Ramai, Enad Dawod, Peter E Darwin, Raymond E Kim, Jeong Hoon Kim, Jade Wang, Chandana Lanka, Tarek Bakain, SriHari Mahadev, Kartik Sampath, David L Carr-Locke, John D Morris, Reem Z Sharaiha
{"title":"Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Transmural Biliary Drainage With 6 mm and 8 mm Cautery-enhanced Lumen-apposing Metal Stents: A Multicenter Collaborative Study.","authors":"Daryl Ramai, Enad Dawod, Peter E Darwin, Raymond E Kim, Jeong Hoon Kim, Jade Wang, Chandana Lanka, Tarek Bakain, SriHari Mahadev, Kartik Sampath, David L Carr-Locke, John D Morris, Reem Z Sharaiha","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) may be unsuccessful in patients with duodenal stenosis or malignant ampullary infiltration. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been proposed as an alternative. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD for malignant distal bile duct obstruction using the newly introduced smaller caliber 6 or 8 mm cautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multicenter retrospective study was performed on patients with unresectable malignant distal bile duct obstruction who underwent EUS-BD between 2021 and 2022 after unsuccessful ERCP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-two patients were included [7 (53.13%) males], with a mean age of 72.2 ± 12.5 years. The technical success rate was 100%. Altered anatomy was present in 2 (6.25%). The indication for drainage was biliary obstruction from pancreatic cancer in 26 patients (84.5%), cholangiocarcinoma in 3 (9.4%), and ampullary mass in 3 (9.4%). The procedure was performed mostly in an outpatient setting (n = 19, 59.38%). The clinical success rate was 92.3% [bilirubin: 14.1 (SD: 8.9) preprocedure vs 4.9 (SD: 1.1) postprocedure; P = 0.0001]. There was one early adverse event of a perforation, which was closed endoscopically and drained percutaneously. Delayed adverse events included food impaction of the stent (n = 1), which was resolved with a repeat procedure and insertion of a double pigtail stent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates the feasibility of EUS-BD drainage using smaller caliber 6 or 8 mm lumen-apposing metal stent to relieve malignant distal bile duct obstruction in patients who fail conventional ERCP.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) may be unsuccessful in patients with duodenal stenosis or malignant ampullary infiltration. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) has been proposed as an alternative. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of EUS-BD for malignant distal bile duct obstruction using the newly introduced smaller caliber 6 or 8 mm cautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stent.

Methods: A multicenter retrospective study was performed on patients with unresectable malignant distal bile duct obstruction who underwent EUS-BD between 2021 and 2022 after unsuccessful ERCP.

Results: Thirty-two patients were included [7 (53.13%) males], with a mean age of 72.2 ± 12.5 years. The technical success rate was 100%. Altered anatomy was present in 2 (6.25%). The indication for drainage was biliary obstruction from pancreatic cancer in 26 patients (84.5%), cholangiocarcinoma in 3 (9.4%), and ampullary mass in 3 (9.4%). The procedure was performed mostly in an outpatient setting (n = 19, 59.38%). The clinical success rate was 92.3% [bilirubin: 14.1 (SD: 8.9) preprocedure vs 4.9 (SD: 1.1) postprocedure; P = 0.0001]. There was one early adverse event of a perforation, which was closed endoscopically and drained percutaneously. Delayed adverse events included food impaction of the stent (n = 1), which was resolved with a repeat procedure and insertion of a double pigtail stent.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of EUS-BD drainage using smaller caliber 6 or 8 mm lumen-apposing metal stent to relieve malignant distal bile duct obstruction in patients who fail conventional ERCP.

内镜超声引导下使用 6 毫米和 8 毫米灼烧增强型管腔贴合金属支架进行跨膜胆道引流:一项多中心合作研究。
目的:内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)可能无法成功治疗十二指肠狭窄或恶性胰腺浸润的患者。有人提出了内镜超声引导胆道引流术(EUS-BD)作为替代方案。我们的目的是评估 EUS-BD 治疗恶性远端胆管阻塞的有效性和安全性,采用新引进的较小口径 6 毫米或 8 毫米烧灼增强型管腔贴合金属支架:对2021年至2022年间ERCP失败后接受EUS-BD治疗的不可切除的恶性远端胆管梗阻患者进行了一项多中心回顾性研究:共纳入 32 例患者[男性 7 例(53.13%)],平均年龄为(72.2 ± 12.5)岁。技术成功率为 100%。2例(6.25%)解剖结构发生改变。26名患者(84.5%)的引流适应症为胰腺癌引起的胆道梗阻,3名患者(9.4%)为胆管癌,3名患者(9.4%)为胰腺肿块。手术大多在门诊进行(19 人,59.38%)。临床成功率为 92.3% [胆红素:术前 14.1(标清:8.9) vs 术后 4.9(标清:1.1);P = 0.0001]。发生了一起穿孔的早期不良事件,经内镜闭合并引流。延迟不良事件包括支架食物嵌塞(1 例),再次手术并插入双辫支架后问题得到解决:本研究证明了使用口径较小的 6 毫米或 8 毫米管腔贴合金属支架进行 EUS-BD 引流术的可行性,可解除传统 ERCP 治疗失败患者的恶性远端胆管梗阻。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信