Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for analgesia in intensive care units: a survey of Canadian critical care physicians.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Kimberly B Tworek, Chen-Hsiang Ma, Dawn Opgenorth, Nadia Baig, Fernando G Zampieri, John Basmaji, Bram Rochwerg, Kimberley Lewis, Sebastian Kilcommons, Sangeeta Mehta, Kimia Honarmand, H Tom Stelfox, M Elizabeth Wilcox, Demetrios J Kutsogiannis, Kirsten M Fiest, Constantine J Karvellas, Wendy Sligl, Oleksa Rewa, Janek Senaratne, Sameer Sharif, Sean M Bagshaw, Vincent I Lau
{"title":"Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for analgesia in intensive care units: a survey of Canadian critical care physicians.","authors":"Kimberly B Tworek, Chen-Hsiang Ma, Dawn Opgenorth, Nadia Baig, Fernando G Zampieri, John Basmaji, Bram Rochwerg, Kimberley Lewis, Sebastian Kilcommons, Sangeeta Mehta, Kimia Honarmand, H Tom Stelfox, M Elizabeth Wilcox, Demetrios J Kutsogiannis, Kirsten M Fiest, Constantine J Karvellas, Wendy Sligl, Oleksa Rewa, Janek Senaratne, Sameer Sharif, Sean M Bagshaw, Vincent I Lau","doi":"10.1007/s12630-024-02800-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Opioids remain the mainstay of analgesia for critically ill patients, but its exposure is associated with negative effects including persistent use after discharge. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may be an effective alternative to opioids with fewer adverse effects. We aimed to describe beliefs and attitudes towards the use of NSAIDs in adult intensive care units (ICUs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our survey of Canadian ICU physicians was conducted using a web-based platform and distributed through the Canadian Critical Care Society (CCCS) email distribution list. We used previously described survey development methodology including question generation and reduction, pretesting, and clinical sensibility and pilot testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 115 completed surveys from 321 CCCS members (36%). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs use was most described as \"rarely\" (59 respondents, 51%) with the primary concern being adverse events (acute kidney injury [108 respondents, 94%] and gastrointestinal bleeding [92 respondents, 80%]). The primary preferred analgesic was acetaminophen (75 respondents, 65%) followed by opioids (40 respondents, 35%). Most respondents (91 respondents, 80%) would be willing to participate in a randomized controlled trial examining NSAID use in critical care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In our survey, Canadian critical care physicians did not mention commonly using NSAIDs primarily because of concerns about adverse events. Nevertheless, respondents were interested in further studying ketorolac, a commonly used NSAID outside of the ICU, in critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":"1388-1396"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02800-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Opioids remain the mainstay of analgesia for critically ill patients, but its exposure is associated with negative effects including persistent use after discharge. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may be an effective alternative to opioids with fewer adverse effects. We aimed to describe beliefs and attitudes towards the use of NSAIDs in adult intensive care units (ICUs).

Methods: Our survey of Canadian ICU physicians was conducted using a web-based platform and distributed through the Canadian Critical Care Society (CCCS) email distribution list. We used previously described survey development methodology including question generation and reduction, pretesting, and clinical sensibility and pilot testing.

Results: We received 115 completed surveys from 321 CCCS members (36%). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs use was most described as "rarely" (59 respondents, 51%) with the primary concern being adverse events (acute kidney injury [108 respondents, 94%] and gastrointestinal bleeding [92 respondents, 80%]). The primary preferred analgesic was acetaminophen (75 respondents, 65%) followed by opioids (40 respondents, 35%). Most respondents (91 respondents, 80%) would be willing to participate in a randomized controlled trial examining NSAID use in critical care.

Conclusions: In our survey, Canadian critical care physicians did not mention commonly using NSAIDs primarily because of concerns about adverse events. Nevertheless, respondents were interested in further studying ketorolac, a commonly used NSAID outside of the ICU, in critically ill patients.

Abstract Image

用于重症监护室镇痛的非甾体类消炎药:加拿大重症监护医生调查。
目的:阿片类药物仍然是重症患者镇痛的主要药物,但其暴露与负面影响有关,包括出院后的持续使用。非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)可能是阿片类药物的有效替代品,且不良反应较少。我们旨在描述成人重症监护病房(ICU)使用非甾体抗炎药的观念和态度:我们对加拿大 ICU 医生的调查是通过网络平台进行的,并通过加拿大重症监护学会 (CCCS) 的电子邮件分发列表进行分发。我们采用了之前介绍过的调查开发方法,包括问题的生成和缩减、预测试、临床敏感性和试点测试:我们收到了来自 321 名 CCCS 会员(36%)的 115 份填写完毕的调查问卷。非甾体类抗炎药的使用情况大多被描述为 "很少"(59 位受访者,51%),主要关注点是不良事件(急性肾损伤 [108 位受访者,94%] 和胃肠道出血 [92 位受访者,80%])。首选镇痛药是对乙酰氨基酚(75 名受访者,65%),其次是阿片类药物(40 名受访者,35%)。大多数受访者(91 名受访者,80%)愿意参与一项随机对照试验,研究非甾体抗炎药在重症监护中的应用:在我们的调查中,加拿大重症监护医生没有提到非甾体抗炎药的常用性,主要是因为担心不良反应。然而,受访者对进一步研究酮咯酸(重症监护室外常用的非甾体抗炎药)在重症患者中的应用很感兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信