The Disproportionate Impact of Primary Care Disruption and Telehealth Utilization During COVID-19.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Zachary J Morgan, Andrew W Bazemore, Lars E Peterson, Robert L Phillips, Mingliang Dai
{"title":"The Disproportionate Impact of Primary Care Disruption and Telehealth Utilization During COVID-19.","authors":"Zachary J Morgan, Andrew W Bazemore, Lars E Peterson, Robert L Phillips, Mingliang Dai","doi":"10.1370/afm.3134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic not only exacerbated existing disparities in health care in general but likely worsened disparities in access to primary care. Our objective was to quantify the nationwide decrease in primary care visits and increase in telehealth utilization during the pandemic and explore whether certain groups of patients were disproportionately affected.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a geographically diverse primary care electronic health record data set to examine the following 3 outcomes: (1) change in total visit volume, (2) change in in-person visit volume, and (3) the telehealth conversion ratio defined as the number of pandemic telehealth visits divided by the total number of prepandemic visits. We assessed whether these outcomes were associated with patient characteristics including age, gender, race, ethnicity, comorbidities, rurality, and area-level social deprivation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our primary sample included 1,652,871 patients from 408 practices. During the pandemic we observed decreases of 7% and 17% in total and in-person visit volume and a 10% telehealth conversion ratio. The greatest decreases in visit volume were observed among pediatric patients (-24%), Asian patients (-11%), and those with more comorbidities (-9%). Telehealth usage was greatest among Hispanic or Latino patients (17%) and those living in urban areas (12%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Decreases in primary care visit volume were partially offset by increasing telehealth use for all patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the magnitude of these changes varied significantly across all patient characteristics. These variations have implications not only for the long-term consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, but also for planners seeking to ready the primary care delivery system for any future systematic disruptions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268690/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3134","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic not only exacerbated existing disparities in health care in general but likely worsened disparities in access to primary care. Our objective was to quantify the nationwide decrease in primary care visits and increase in telehealth utilization during the pandemic and explore whether certain groups of patients were disproportionately affected.

Methods: We used a geographically diverse primary care electronic health record data set to examine the following 3 outcomes: (1) change in total visit volume, (2) change in in-person visit volume, and (3) the telehealth conversion ratio defined as the number of pandemic telehealth visits divided by the total number of prepandemic visits. We assessed whether these outcomes were associated with patient characteristics including age, gender, race, ethnicity, comorbidities, rurality, and area-level social deprivation.

Results: Our primary sample included 1,652,871 patients from 408 practices. During the pandemic we observed decreases of 7% and 17% in total and in-person visit volume and a 10% telehealth conversion ratio. The greatest decreases in visit volume were observed among pediatric patients (-24%), Asian patients (-11%), and those with more comorbidities (-9%). Telehealth usage was greatest among Hispanic or Latino patients (17%) and those living in urban areas (12%).

Conclusions: Decreases in primary care visit volume were partially offset by increasing telehealth use for all patients during the COVID-19 pandemic, but the magnitude of these changes varied significantly across all patient characteristics. These variations have implications not only for the long-term consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, but also for planners seeking to ready the primary care delivery system for any future systematic disruptions.

在 COVID-19 期间,初级保健中断和远程保健使用的不成比例影响。
目的:COVID-19 大流行不仅在总体上加剧了医疗保健方面的现有差距,而且很可能使获得初级医疗保健方面的差距更加严重。我们的目标是量化大流行期间全国范围内初级医疗就诊率的下降和远程医疗使用率的上升,并探讨某些患者群体是否受到了不成比例的影响:我们使用了一个具有地域多样性的初级保健电子健康记录数据集来检查以下 3 个结果:(1) 总就诊量的变化;(2) 亲临就诊量的变化;(3) 远程保健转换率,即大流行期间远程保健就诊次数除以大流行前就诊总次数。我们评估了这些结果是否与患者特征有关,包括年龄、性别、种族、民族、合并症、农村地区和地区级社会贫困程度:我们的主要样本包括来自 408 家诊所的 1,652,871 名患者。在大流行期间,我们观察到总就诊量和亲自就诊量分别下降了 7% 和 17%,远程医疗转换率下降了 10%。儿科患者(-24%)、亚裔患者(-11%)和合并症较多的患者(-9%)的就诊量降幅最大。西班牙裔或拉丁裔患者(17%)和居住在城市地区的患者(12%)使用远程医疗的比例最高:结论:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,所有患者远程医疗使用率的增加部分抵消了初级保健就诊量的减少,但在所有患者特征中,这些变化的幅度差异很大。这些变化不仅对 COVID-19 大流行的长期后果有影响,而且对规划者寻求使初级医疗服务系统做好准备以应对未来的系统性混乱也有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Family Medicine
Annals of Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信