Alcohol attention bias modulates neural engagement during moral processing.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Social Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1080/17470919.2024.2377666
Samantha J Fede, Mallory A Kisner, Sarah F Dean, Emma Buckler, Robin Chholak, Reza Momenan
{"title":"Alcohol attention bias modulates neural engagement during moral processing.","authors":"Samantha J Fede, Mallory A Kisner, Sarah F Dean, Emma Buckler, Robin Chholak, Reza Momenan","doi":"10.1080/17470919.2024.2377666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The neurobiology of typical moral cognition involves the interaction of frontal, limbic, and temporoparietal networks. There is still much to be understood mechanistically about how moral processing is disrupted; such understanding is key to combating antisociality. Neuroscientific models suggest a key role for attention mechanisms in atypical moral processing. We hypothesized that attention-bias toward alcohol cues in alcohol use disorder (AUD) leads to a failure to properly engage with morally relevant stimuli, reducing moral processing. We recruited patients with AUD (<i>n</i> = 30) and controls (<i>n</i> = 30). During functional magnetic resonance imaging, participants viewed pairs of images consisting of a moral or neutral cue and an alcohol or neutral distractor. When viewing moral cues paired with alcohol distractors, individuals with AUD had lower medial prefrontal cortex engagement; this pattern was also seen for left amygdala in younger iAUDs. Across groups, individuals had less engagement of middle/superior temporal gyri. These findings provide initial support for AUD-related attention bias interference in sociomoral processing. If supported in future longitudinal and causal study designs, this finding carries potential societal and clinical benefits by suggesting a novel, leverageable mechanism and in providing a cognitive explanation that may help combat persistent stigma.</p>","PeriodicalId":49511,"journal":{"name":"Social Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"106-123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11382621/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2024.2377666","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The neurobiology of typical moral cognition involves the interaction of frontal, limbic, and temporoparietal networks. There is still much to be understood mechanistically about how moral processing is disrupted; such understanding is key to combating antisociality. Neuroscientific models suggest a key role for attention mechanisms in atypical moral processing. We hypothesized that attention-bias toward alcohol cues in alcohol use disorder (AUD) leads to a failure to properly engage with morally relevant stimuli, reducing moral processing. We recruited patients with AUD (n = 30) and controls (n = 30). During functional magnetic resonance imaging, participants viewed pairs of images consisting of a moral or neutral cue and an alcohol or neutral distractor. When viewing moral cues paired with alcohol distractors, individuals with AUD had lower medial prefrontal cortex engagement; this pattern was also seen for left amygdala in younger iAUDs. Across groups, individuals had less engagement of middle/superior temporal gyri. These findings provide initial support for AUD-related attention bias interference in sociomoral processing. If supported in future longitudinal and causal study designs, this finding carries potential societal and clinical benefits by suggesting a novel, leverageable mechanism and in providing a cognitive explanation that may help combat persistent stigma.

酒精注意偏差会调节道德处理过程中的神经参与。
典型道德认知的神经生物学涉及额叶、边缘和颞顶叶网络的相互作用。关于道德处理是如何被破坏的,仍有许多问题需要从机制上加以了解;这种了解是打击反社会行为的关键。神经科学模型表明,注意力机制在非典型道德处理中起着关键作用。我们假设,酒精使用障碍(AUD)患者对酒精线索的注意偏差会导致他们无法正确地接触与道德相关的刺激,从而降低道德处理能力。我们招募了 AUD 患者(30 人)和对照组(30 人)。在功能磁共振成像过程中,参与者观看由道德或中性线索和酒精或中性干扰物组成的成对图像。在观看与酒精干扰物配对的道德线索时,AUD 患者的内侧前额叶皮层参与度较低;在年轻的 iAUD 患者中,左侧杏仁核也出现了这种模式。在各组中,颞叶中/上回的参与度较低。这些发现初步支持了与 AUD 相关的注意力偏差对社会道德处理的干扰。如果在未来的纵向和因果研究设计中得到支持,这一发现将通过提出一种新的、可利用的机制,并提供一种认知解释来帮助消除持续的污名化,从而为社会和临床带来潜在的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Neuroscience
Social Neuroscience 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Social Neuroscience features original empirical Research Papers as well as targeted Reviews, Commentaries and Fast Track Brief Reports that examine how the brain mediates social behavior, social cognition, social interactions and relationships, group social dynamics, and related topics that deal with social/interpersonal psychology and neurobiology. Multi-paper symposia and special topic issues are organized and presented regularly as well. The goal of Social Neuroscience is to provide a place to publish empirical articles that intend to further our understanding of the neural mechanisms contributing to the development and maintenance of social behaviors, or to understanding how these mechanisms are disrupted in clinical disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信