Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence and Safety Assessment of Two Venlafaxine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsules in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fed Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Crossover Study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Drugs in Research & Development Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1007/s40268-024-00470-w
Yingxia He, Jie Wang, Fang Yao, Pan Lu, Yafang Xie, Xiuwen Li, Qiangwei Liu, Yang Liu, Dan Cao, Jun Liang, Dan Tian, Guan Liu
{"title":"Pharmacokinetic Bioequivalence and Safety Assessment of Two Venlafaxine Hydrochloride Extended-Release Capsules in Healthy Chinese Subjects Under Fed Conditions: A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Crossover Study.","authors":"Yingxia He, Jie Wang, Fang Yao, Pan Lu, Yafang Xie, Xiuwen Li, Qiangwei Liu, Yang Liu, Dan Cao, Jun Liang, Dan Tian, Guan Liu","doi":"10.1007/s40268-024-00470-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release (ER) capsules are commonly used to treat depression and anxiety disorders. Evaluation of the bioequivalence of generic formulations with reference products is essential to ensure therapeutic equivalence. The objective of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence, safety, and tolerability of Chinese-manufactured venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release capsules compared with USA-manufactured EFFEXOR<sup>®</sup> XR in healthy Chinese volunteers under fed conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized, open-label, single-dose, crossover study was conducted. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive the test formulation (one 150-mg ER capsule manufactured in China) or the reference formulation (one 150-mg ER capsule manufactured in the USA). The bioequivalence of the two drugs was assessed using the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last sampling time (AUC<sub>0-t</sub>) and the maximum observed concentration (C<sub>max</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 28 subjects were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive a single dose of either the test or reference capsule. All the subjects completed the study and were included in the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety analyses. The mean AUC<sub>0-t</sub> and C<sub>max</sub> of venlafaxine and its active metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine were comparable between the test and reference products with both parameters close to 100% and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals within the specified 80-125% bioequivalence boundary. Safety was also assessed between the two products and all adverse events (AEs) in this study were mild in severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the test and reference venlafaxine hydrochloride ER capsules were bioequivalent and showed a similar safety and tolerability profile in the population studied.</p><p><strong>Clinical trials registration: </strong>This study was registered at the Drug Clinical Trial Registration and Information Publicity Platform ( http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html ) with registration number CTR20211243, date: June 1, 2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":49258,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Research & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-024-00470-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release (ER) capsules are commonly used to treat depression and anxiety disorders. Evaluation of the bioequivalence of generic formulations with reference products is essential to ensure therapeutic equivalence. The objective of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence, safety, and tolerability of Chinese-manufactured venlafaxine hydrochloride extended-release capsules compared with USA-manufactured EFFEXOR® XR in healthy Chinese volunteers under fed conditions.

Methods: A randomized, open-label, single-dose, crossover study was conducted. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive the test formulation (one 150-mg ER capsule manufactured in China) or the reference formulation (one 150-mg ER capsule manufactured in the USA). The bioequivalence of the two drugs was assessed using the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last sampling time (AUC0-t) and the maximum observed concentration (Cmax).

Results: A total of 28 subjects were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive a single dose of either the test or reference capsule. All the subjects completed the study and were included in the pharmacokinetic (PK) and safety analyses. The mean AUC0-t and Cmax of venlafaxine and its active metabolite O-desmethylvenlafaxine were comparable between the test and reference products with both parameters close to 100% and the corresponding 90% confidence intervals within the specified 80-125% bioequivalence boundary. Safety was also assessed between the two products and all adverse events (AEs) in this study were mild in severity.

Conclusions: Both the test and reference venlafaxine hydrochloride ER capsules were bioequivalent and showed a similar safety and tolerability profile in the population studied.

Clinical trials registration: This study was registered at the Drug Clinical Trial Registration and Information Publicity Platform ( http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html ) with registration number CTR20211243, date: June 1, 2021.

Abstract Image

在进食条件下,对中国健康受试者服用两种盐酸文拉法辛缓释胶囊的药代动力学生物等效性和安全性评估:一项随机、开放标签、单剂量、交叉研究。
背景和目的:盐酸文拉法辛缓释(ER)胶囊常用于治疗抑郁症和焦虑症。评估仿制制剂与参比产品的生物等效性对于确保治疗等效性至关重要。本研究的目的是评估中国生产的盐酸文拉法辛缓释胶囊与美国生产的EFFEXOR® XR相比,在喂养条件下对中国健康志愿者的生物等效性、安全性和耐受性:方法:进行了一项随机、开放标签、单剂量、交叉研究。受试者被随机分配接受试验制剂(一粒中国生产的150毫克ER胶囊)或参比制剂(一粒美国生产的150毫克ER胶囊)。采用从零时到最后采样时间的血浆浓度-时间曲线下面积(AUC0-t)和最大观察浓度(Cmax)评估两种药物的生物等效性:共有 28 名受试者参加了研究,并被随机分配接受单剂量的试验胶囊或参比胶囊。所有受试者都完成了研究,并被纳入药代动力学(PK)和安全性分析。文拉法辛及其活性代谢物O-去甲文拉法辛的平均AUC0-t和Cmax在试验产品和参比产品之间具有可比性,两个参数均接近100%,相应的90%置信区间在规定的80-125%生物等效边界内。本研究还对两种产品的安全性进行了评估,所有不良事件(AEs)的严重程度均为轻度:结论:试验用盐酸文拉法辛ER胶囊和参照用盐酸文拉法辛ER胶囊具有生物等效性,在研究人群中表现出相似的安全性和耐受性:本研究已在药物临床试验注册与信息公示平台( http://www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn/index.html )注册,注册号为 CTR20211243,日期为 2021 年 6 月 1 日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drugs in Research & Development
Drugs in Research & Development Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs in R&D is an international, peer reviewed, open access, online only journal, and provides timely information from all phases of drug research and development that will inform clinical practice. Healthcare decision makers are thus provided with knowledge about the developing place of a drug in therapy. The Journal includes: Clinical research on new and established drugs; Preclinical research of direct relevance to clinical drug development; Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered; Reviews may also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信