Implementation and Evaluation of Clinical Decision Support for Apixaban Dosing in a Community Teaching Hospital.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Safety Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-23 DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001265
Rebecca Cope, Maram Sarsour, Evan Sasson, Hasan Badran, Ka Yeun Kim, Rachel Quinn
{"title":"Implementation and Evaluation of Clinical Decision Support for Apixaban Dosing in a Community Teaching Hospital.","authors":"Rebecca Cope, Maram Sarsour, Evan Sasson, Hasan Badran, Ka Yeun Kim, Rachel Quinn","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to describe and evaluate the transition from a specialty service-based prospective order approval system to a computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) tool for apixaban dosing at a community teaching hospital. The primary objective was to assess the impact of the transition on the appropriateness of apixaban prescribing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A CCDS tool for apixaban dosing was developed and implemented using interprofessional collaboration. A retrospective chart review was conducted for apixaban orders placed before (preimplementation) and after (postimplementation) the CCDS transition. The primary outcome was the percent change in inappropriate apixaban orders, with secondary outcomes exploring percent change of apixaban orders with inappropriate dosing in different patient groups and indications per package insert.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty orders were assessed in both arms, with 8% of orders preimplementation and 10% postimplementation deemed inappropriate. After accounting for questionable orders, overall appropriateness of prescribing was 88% preimplementation and 84% postimplementation ( P = 0.7). Challenges with implementation of CCDS included working with available information technology resources and facilitating acceptance of a new ordering process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of a CCDS tool for apixaban dosing at a community teaching hospital demonstrated comparable rates of appropriateness to the previous specialty service-based approval process. While the transition streamlined resources and improved efficiency, ongoing efforts are needed to address specific dosing challenges. Future research should explore the sustainability and generalizability of CCDS tools in diverse healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001265","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to describe and evaluate the transition from a specialty service-based prospective order approval system to a computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) tool for apixaban dosing at a community teaching hospital. The primary objective was to assess the impact of the transition on the appropriateness of apixaban prescribing.

Methods: A CCDS tool for apixaban dosing was developed and implemented using interprofessional collaboration. A retrospective chart review was conducted for apixaban orders placed before (preimplementation) and after (postimplementation) the CCDS transition. The primary outcome was the percent change in inappropriate apixaban orders, with secondary outcomes exploring percent change of apixaban orders with inappropriate dosing in different patient groups and indications per package insert.

Results: Fifty orders were assessed in both arms, with 8% of orders preimplementation and 10% postimplementation deemed inappropriate. After accounting for questionable orders, overall appropriateness of prescribing was 88% preimplementation and 84% postimplementation ( P = 0.7). Challenges with implementation of CCDS included working with available information technology resources and facilitating acceptance of a new ordering process.

Conclusions: The implementation of a CCDS tool for apixaban dosing at a community teaching hospital demonstrated comparable rates of appropriateness to the previous specialty service-based approval process. While the transition streamlined resources and improved efficiency, ongoing efforts are needed to address specific dosing challenges. Future research should explore the sustainability and generalizability of CCDS tools in diverse healthcare settings.

在社区教学医院实施和评估阿哌沙班剂量临床决策支持。
目的:本研究旨在描述和评估一家社区教学医院从基于专科服务的前瞻性医嘱审批系统向阿哌沙班剂量计算机化临床决策支持(CCDS)工具的过渡。主要目的是评估过渡对阿哌沙班处方合理性的影响:方法:通过跨专业合作,开发并实施了用于阿哌沙班剂量的 CCDS 工具。对 CCDS 过渡前(实施前)和实施后(实施后)的阿哌沙班处方进行了回顾性病历审查。主要结果是不适当阿哌沙班订单的百分比变化,次要结果是探讨不同患者组和包装说明书适应症中不适当剂量的阿哌沙班订单的百分比变化:两组共评估了 50 份医嘱,实施前有 8%的医嘱被认为不合适,实施后有 10%的医嘱被认为不合适。考虑到有问题的订单,实施前处方的总体适当性为 88%,实施后为 84%(P = 0.7)。实施 CCDS 所面临的挑战包括利用现有的信息技术资源和促进对新订购流程的接受:结论:在一家社区教学医院实施阿哌沙班剂量的 CCDS 工具后,显示出与之前基于专科服务的审批流程相当的适当性。虽然这一转变精简了资源并提高了效率,但仍需不断努力以应对特定的剂量挑战。未来的研究应探索 CCDS 工具在不同医疗环境中的可持续性和通用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信