Feasibility of a contraceptive-specific electronic health record system to promote the adoption of pharmacist-prescribed contraceptive services in community pharmacies in the United States.

IF 2.5 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
JAMIA Open Pub Date : 2024-07-22 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae071
Devin J Bustin, Rebecca Simmons, Jake Galdo, Mary E Kucek, Lissette Logan, Rich Cohn, Heather Smith
{"title":"Feasibility of a contraceptive-specific electronic health record system to promote the adoption of pharmacist-prescribed contraceptive services in community pharmacies in the United States.","authors":"Devin J Bustin, Rebecca Simmons, Jake Galdo, Mary E Kucek, Lissette Logan, Rich Cohn, Heather Smith","doi":"10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pharmacists in over half of the United States can prescribe contraceptives; however, low pharmacist adoption has impeded the full realization of potential public health benefits. Many barriers to adoption may be addressed by leveraging an electronic health records (EHR) system with clinical decision support tools and workflow automation. We conducted a feasibility study to determine if utilizing a contraceptive-specific EHR could improve potential barriers to the implementation of pharmacist-prescribed contraceptive services.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>20 pharmacists each performed two standardized patient encounter simulations: one on the EHR and one on the current standard of care paper-based workflow. A crossover study design was utilized, with each pharmacist performing encounters on both standardized patients with the modality order randomized. Encounters were timed, contraceptive outputs were recorded, and the pharmacists completed externally validated workload and usability surveys after each encounter, and a Perception, Attitude, and Satisfaction survey created by the research team after the final encounter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pharmacists were more likely to identify contraceptive ineligibility using the EHR-based workflow compared to the paper workflow (<i>P</i> = .003). Contraceptive encounter time was not significantly different between the 2 modalities (<i>P</i> = .280). Pharmacists reported lower mental demand (<i>P</i> = .003) and greater perceived usefulness (<i>P</i> = .029) with the EHR-based workflow compared to the paper modality.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusion: </strong>Pharmacist performance and acceptance of contraceptive services delivery were improved with the EHR workflow. Pharmacist-specific contraceptive EHR workflows show potential to improve pharmacist adoption and provision of appropriate contraceptive care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36278,"journal":{"name":"JAMIA Open","volume":"7 3","pages":"ooae071"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262636/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMIA Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Pharmacists in over half of the United States can prescribe contraceptives; however, low pharmacist adoption has impeded the full realization of potential public health benefits. Many barriers to adoption may be addressed by leveraging an electronic health records (EHR) system with clinical decision support tools and workflow automation. We conducted a feasibility study to determine if utilizing a contraceptive-specific EHR could improve potential barriers to the implementation of pharmacist-prescribed contraceptive services.

Materials and methods: 20 pharmacists each performed two standardized patient encounter simulations: one on the EHR and one on the current standard of care paper-based workflow. A crossover study design was utilized, with each pharmacist performing encounters on both standardized patients with the modality order randomized. Encounters were timed, contraceptive outputs were recorded, and the pharmacists completed externally validated workload and usability surveys after each encounter, and a Perception, Attitude, and Satisfaction survey created by the research team after the final encounter.

Results: Pharmacists were more likely to identify contraceptive ineligibility using the EHR-based workflow compared to the paper workflow (P = .003). Contraceptive encounter time was not significantly different between the 2 modalities (P = .280). Pharmacists reported lower mental demand (P = .003) and greater perceived usefulness (P = .029) with the EHR-based workflow compared to the paper modality.

Discussion and conclusion: Pharmacist performance and acceptance of contraceptive services delivery were improved with the EHR workflow. Pharmacist-specific contraceptive EHR workflows show potential to improve pharmacist adoption and provision of appropriate contraceptive care.

在美国社区药房推广药剂师处方避孕服务的避孕药具专用电子健康记录系统的可行性。
目标:美国一半以上地区的药剂师可以开具避孕药具处方;然而,药剂师采用率低阻碍了潜在公共卫生效益的充分实现。利用具有临床决策支持工具和工作流程自动化功能的电子健康记录 (EHR) 系统可以解决许多采用障碍。我们进行了一项可行性研究,以确定使用避孕药具专用电子病历是否能改善药剂师处方避孕药具服务实施过程中的潜在障碍。材料与方法:20 名药剂师每人进行了两次标准化患者就诊模拟:一次在电子病历上进行,另一次在当前的纸质护理标准工作流程上进行。采用交叉研究设计,每位药剂师对两个标准化病人进行会诊,方式顺序随机。每次接诊后,药剂师都要完成经外部验证的工作量和可用性调查,并在最后一次接诊后完成由研究小组制作的感知、态度和满意度调查:结果:与纸质工作流程相比,药剂师使用基于电子病历的工作流程更有可能识别出不符合避孕条件的患者(P = .003)。两种方式的避孕时间差异不大(P = .280)。与纸质工作流程相比,药剂师对基于电子病历的工作流程的心理需求更低(P = .003),对其有用性的感知更高(P = .029):药剂师在提供避孕服务方面的表现和接受程度在使用电子病历工作流程后得到了提高。药剂师专用的避孕药具电子病历工作流程显示出提高药剂师采用率和提供适当避孕护理的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMIA Open
JAMIA Open Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
102
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信