Unlocking the Potential of the HEART Pathway: Predicting MACE and Facilitating Nurse-Physician Collaboration in Chest Pain Unit.

Q3 Medicine
Zahra Behpour, Zahra Amirsardari, Haniye Aghakhani, Mohammadesmaeil Zanganehfar, Shiva Khaleghparast, Fidan Shabani, Hooman Bakhshandeh, Parham Sadeghipour
{"title":"Unlocking the Potential of the HEART Pathway: Predicting MACE and Facilitating Nurse-Physician Collaboration in Chest Pain Unit.","authors":"Zahra Behpour, Zahra Amirsardari, Haniye Aghakhani, Mohammadesmaeil Zanganehfar, Shiva Khaleghparast, Fidan Shabani, Hooman Bakhshandeh, Parham Sadeghipour","doi":"10.1097/HPC.0000000000000374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>The HEART pathway serves as a tool for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among patients presenting with acute chest pain, aiding in early discharge of low-risk patients and reducing unnecessary cardiac investigations. This study aimed to evaluate physician-nurse reliability of the HEART pathway. Moreover investigates the efficacy of HEART pathway to predict 3-month MACE in patients with acute chest pain.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a prospective study on 97 patients experiencing acute chest pain. A team of three professionals - a nurse, a cardiology resident, and a cardiology attending physician - performed risk stratification. We assessed inter-rater reliability among the raters as well as explored 3-month MACE outcomes.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Excellent pairwise agreements were found between the raters. Overall agreement among raters was excellent, with an ICC of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.73 - 0.97). The HEART pathway score exhibited strong predictive power (AUC: 0.85) for 3-month MACE. At a cut-off score of 4, sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values were 87.5%, 58.9%, and 95.8%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The HEART pathway score effectively predicts 3-month MACE in patients with acute non-traumatic chest pain. Moreover, the high agreement among the attending physician, the resident physician, and the nurse suggests that nurses could use this tool, potentially reducing the workload on physicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":35914,"journal":{"name":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Pathways in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HPC.0000000000000374","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: The HEART pathway serves as a tool for predicting major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among patients presenting with acute chest pain, aiding in early discharge of low-risk patients and reducing unnecessary cardiac investigations. This study aimed to evaluate physician-nurse reliability of the HEART pathway. Moreover investigates the efficacy of HEART pathway to predict 3-month MACE in patients with acute chest pain.

Method: We conducted a prospective study on 97 patients experiencing acute chest pain. A team of three professionals - a nurse, a cardiology resident, and a cardiology attending physician - performed risk stratification. We assessed inter-rater reliability among the raters as well as explored 3-month MACE outcomes.

Result: Excellent pairwise agreements were found between the raters. Overall agreement among raters was excellent, with an ICC of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.73 - 0.97). The HEART pathway score exhibited strong predictive power (AUC: 0.85) for 3-month MACE. At a cut-off score of 4, sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive values were 87.5%, 58.9%, and 95.8%, respectively.

Conclusion: The HEART pathway score effectively predicts 3-month MACE in patients with acute non-traumatic chest pain. Moreover, the high agreement among the attending physician, the resident physician, and the nurse suggests that nurses could use this tool, potentially reducing the workload on physicians.

释放 HEART Pathway 的潜力:预测 MACE 并促进胸痛科护士与医生的合作。
背景和目的:HEART 路径是预测急性胸痛患者主要不良心脏事件 (MACE) 的工具,有助于低风险患者尽早出院并减少不必要的心脏检查。本研究旨在评估 HEART 路径的医生-护士可靠性。此外,还研究了 HEART 路径预测急性胸痛患者 3 个月 MACE 的有效性:我们对 97 名急性胸痛患者进行了前瞻性研究。由一名护士、一名心脏病学住院医师和一名心脏病学主治医师组成的三人专业团队进行了风险分层。我们评估了评分者之间的可靠性,并探讨了 3 个月的 MACE 结果:结果:评分者之间的配对一致性极佳。评分者之间的总体一致性非常好,ICC 为 0.84(95% CI:0.73 - 0.97)。HEART 路径评分对 3 个月的 MACE 具有很强的预测能力(AUC:0.85)。在截断分数为 4 时,灵敏度、特异性和阴性预测值分别为 87.5%、58.9% 和 95.8%:结论:HEART 路径评分可有效预测急性非创伤性胸痛患者 3 个月后的 MACE。此外,主治医生、住院医生和护士之间的高度一致表明护士可以使用这一工具,从而减轻医生的工作量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Pathways in Cardiology
Critical Pathways in Cardiology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: Critical Pathways in Cardiology provides a single source for the diagnostic and therapeutic protocols in use at hospitals worldwide for patients with cardiac disorders. The Journal presents critical pathways for specific diagnoses—complete with evidence-based rationales—and also publishes studies of these protocols" effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信