Ethical Challenges in Social Work Licensing Examinations: A Call for Integrity and Strategies for Success.

IF 2.7 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
Social work Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/sw/swae037
Rigaud Joseph
{"title":"Ethical Challenges in Social Work Licensing Examinations: A Call for Integrity and Strategies for Success.","authors":"Rigaud Joseph","doi":"10.1093/sw/swae037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article discusses four questions. First, what is the operational framework of the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB)? Second, how congruent is the ASWB's operational framework with social work values and ethics? Third, why do ASWB exam candidates from disadvantaged backgrounds-those who identify as African American, who are older, and who do not speak English as a first language-register comparatively lower pass rates in the clinical licensure examination? Fourth, what are ethically sound novel strategies for improving the ASWB exam? This article argues that (1) ASWB, in its present state, operates under a business model philosophy, which is incongruent with the social work value of integrity, and (2) the disparities in pass rates in the ASWB exam may reflect its lack of validity. This article also presents three relatively innovative strategies for restoring confidence and increasing success in the ASWB social work licensing exam and two contingent solutions to the problem of exam pass rate disparities based on race, age, and primary language. The implications of this study for social work stakeholders are also discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":21875,"journal":{"name":"Social work","volume":" ","pages":"395-402"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social work","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/swae037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article discusses four questions. First, what is the operational framework of the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB)? Second, how congruent is the ASWB's operational framework with social work values and ethics? Third, why do ASWB exam candidates from disadvantaged backgrounds-those who identify as African American, who are older, and who do not speak English as a first language-register comparatively lower pass rates in the clinical licensure examination? Fourth, what are ethically sound novel strategies for improving the ASWB exam? This article argues that (1) ASWB, in its present state, operates under a business model philosophy, which is incongruent with the social work value of integrity, and (2) the disparities in pass rates in the ASWB exam may reflect its lack of validity. This article also presents three relatively innovative strategies for restoring confidence and increasing success in the ASWB social work licensing exam and two contingent solutions to the problem of exam pass rate disparities based on race, age, and primary language. The implications of this study for social work stakeholders are also discussed.

社会工作执照考试中的道德挑战:呼吁诚信和成功策略》。
本文讨论了四个问题。第一,社会工作委员会协会(ASWB)的运作框架是什么?第二,ASWB 的运作框架与社会工作价值观和伦理道德的一致性如何?第三,为什么来自弱势背景的 ASWB 考试考生--那些被认定为非裔美国人、年龄较大、英语不是第一语言的考生--在临床执照考试中的通过率相对较低?第四,改进 ASWB 考试的道德合理的新策略是什么?本文认为:(1) ASWB 目前是在商业模式的理念下运作的,这与社会工作的诚信价值观不符;(2) ASWB 考试通过率的差异可能反映了其缺乏有效性。本文还提出了三项相对创新的策略,以恢复信心,提高 ASWB 社会工作执业资格考试的成功率,并针对考试通过率因种族、年龄和主要语言而存在差异的问题,提出了两个应急解决方案。本文还讨论了本研究对社会工作利益相关者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social work
Social work SOCIAL WORK-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信