Implementation of Nasal CPAP Weaning Guidelines in Preterm Infants.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Shivani N Mattikalli, Kimberly Wisecup, Heather Stephens, Ann Donnelly, Jennifer Erkinger, Sandeep Pradhan, Shaili Amatya
{"title":"Implementation of Nasal CPAP Weaning Guidelines in Preterm Infants.","authors":"Shivani N Mattikalli, Kimberly Wisecup, Heather Stephens, Ann Donnelly, Jennifer Erkinger, Sandeep Pradhan, Shaili Amatya","doi":"10.4187/respcare.11915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>CPAP benefits preterm infants with respiratory distress, including reduced bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) incidence, surfactant use, and extubation failure. Successful CPAP weaning also promotes oral feeding. However, there is no consensus on the optimal weaning of CPAP in neonates. This study aimed to determine the effects of CPAP weaning guideline implementation on neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CPAP gradual pressure weaning guidelines were implemented in the Penn State Children's Hospital neonatal ICU in 2020. We included baseline data from infants (epoch 1) before guideline implementation in 2018-2019. We included infants (epoch 2) after implementing the guidelines during 2020-2021. The inclusion criteria were infants < 32 weeks gestation with CPAP support. Adherence with the CPAP weaning guidelines was the primary process measure. Primary outcome measures included successful CPAP wean on the first attempt. Balancing measures used were total days on respiratory support and hospital length of stay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred ninety-five infants were included in this study, 95 infants in epoch 1 before guideline implementation and 100 infants in epoch 2 after implementing guidelines. Infants in the 2 epochs were similar in median gestational age at 29 weeks versus 30 weeks (<i>P</i> = .47) and were similar in median birthweight at 1,190 g versus 1,130 g (<i>P</i> = .73). After implementing weaning guidelines, the successful weaning off CPAP improved from 9.5% to 54% (<i>P</i> < .001). The total days needed to achieve full oral feeds decreased by 7 d (29 median d vs 22 median d, <i>P</i> < .001). The BPD incidence was not significantly different between the 2 epochs at 17% versus 16%, <i>P</i> = .87. There was no difference in total days of respiratory support, total length of stay, the number of infants discharged on home nasogastric feeding, and demographic variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of the bubble CPAP weaning guideline improved the successful weaning of CPAP and promoted oral feeding in preterm infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11915","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: CPAP benefits preterm infants with respiratory distress, including reduced bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) incidence, surfactant use, and extubation failure. Successful CPAP weaning also promotes oral feeding. However, there is no consensus on the optimal weaning of CPAP in neonates. This study aimed to determine the effects of CPAP weaning guideline implementation on neonatal outcomes.

Methods: CPAP gradual pressure weaning guidelines were implemented in the Penn State Children's Hospital neonatal ICU in 2020. We included baseline data from infants (epoch 1) before guideline implementation in 2018-2019. We included infants (epoch 2) after implementing the guidelines during 2020-2021. The inclusion criteria were infants < 32 weeks gestation with CPAP support. Adherence with the CPAP weaning guidelines was the primary process measure. Primary outcome measures included successful CPAP wean on the first attempt. Balancing measures used were total days on respiratory support and hospital length of stay.

Results: One hundred ninety-five infants were included in this study, 95 infants in epoch 1 before guideline implementation and 100 infants in epoch 2 after implementing guidelines. Infants in the 2 epochs were similar in median gestational age at 29 weeks versus 30 weeks (P = .47) and were similar in median birthweight at 1,190 g versus 1,130 g (P = .73). After implementing weaning guidelines, the successful weaning off CPAP improved from 9.5% to 54% (P < .001). The total days needed to achieve full oral feeds decreased by 7 d (29 median d vs 22 median d, P < .001). The BPD incidence was not significantly different between the 2 epochs at 17% versus 16%, P = .87. There was no difference in total days of respiratory support, total length of stay, the number of infants discharged on home nasogastric feeding, and demographic variables.

Conclusions: The implementation of the bubble CPAP weaning guideline improved the successful weaning of CPAP and promoted oral feeding in preterm infants.

早产儿鼻用 CPAP 断奶指南的实施。
背景:持续气道正压(CPAP)对呼吸窘迫的早产儿有益,包括降低支气管肺发育不良(BPD)的发生率、表面活性物质的使用和拔管失败率。成功的 CPAP 断奶还能促进口服喂养。然而,关于新生儿断用 CPAP 的最佳方法尚未达成共识。本研究旨在确定 CPAP(持续负压通气)断奶指南的实施对新生儿预后的影响:2020年,宾夕法尼亚州立儿童医院新生儿重症监护室开始实施CPAP渐进式压力断奶指南。我们纳入了 2018-19 年气泡 CPAP 实施前的婴儿基线数据(Epoch1)。我们纳入了 2020-21 年实施指南后的婴儿(Epoch2)。纳入标准为婴儿 结果:本研究共纳入 195 名婴儿,其中 95 名婴儿在气泡式 CPAP 实施前的 Epoch 1 中,100 名婴儿在实施指南后的 Epoch 2 中。两个时代的婴儿胎龄中位数相似,分别为 29 周和 30 周(P=0.47),出生体重中位数相似,分别为 1190 克和 1130 克(P=0.73)。在实施断奶指南后,成功断开 CPAP 的比例从 9.5% 提高到 54%(P=0.47):气泡式 CPAP 断奶指南的实施提高了早产儿成功断开 CPAP 的几率,并促进了口服喂养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信