Clinical Outcomes Among High-Risk Primary Care Patients With Diabetic Kidney Disease: Methodological Challenges and Results From the STOP-DKD Study.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Medical Care Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1097/MLR.0000000000002043
Hayden B Bosworth, Uptal D Patel, Allison A Lewinski, Clemontina A Davenport, Jane Pendergast, Megan Oakes, Matthew J Crowley, Leah L Zullig, Sejal Patel, Jivan Moaddeb, Julie Miller, Shauna Malone, Huiman Barnhart, Clarissa J Diamantidis
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes Among High-Risk Primary Care Patients With Diabetic Kidney Disease: Methodological Challenges and Results From the STOP-DKD Study.","authors":"Hayden B Bosworth, Uptal D Patel, Allison A Lewinski, Clemontina A Davenport, Jane Pendergast, Megan Oakes, Matthew J Crowley, Leah L Zullig, Sejal Patel, Jivan Moaddeb, Julie Miller, Shauna Malone, Huiman Barnhart, Clarissa J Diamantidis","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000002043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objective: </strong>Slowing the progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is critical. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to target risk factors for DKD progression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the effect of a pharmacist-led intervention focused on supporting healthy behaviors, medication management, and self-monitoring on decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for 36 months compared with an educational control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We randomized 138 individuals to the intervention group and 143 to control. At baseline, mean (SD) eGFR was 80.7 (21.7) mL/min/1.73m 2 , 56% of participants had chronic kidney disease and a history of uncontrolled hypertension with a baseline SBP of 134.3 mm Hg. The mean (SD) decline in eGFR by cystatin C from baseline to 36 months was 5.0 (19.6) and 5.9 (18.6) mL/min/1.73m 2 for the control and intervention groups, respectively, with no significant between-group difference ( P =0.75).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not observe a significant difference in clinical outcomes by study arm. However, we showed that individuals with DKD will engage in a pharmacist-led intervention. The potential explanations for a lack of change in DKD risk factors can be attributed to 5 broad issues, challenges: (1) associated with enrolling patients with low eGFR and poor BP control; (2) implementing the intervention; (3) limited duration during which to observe any clinical benefit from the intervention; (4) potential co-intervention or contamination; and (5) low statistical power.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000002043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objective: Slowing the progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is critical. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to target risk factors for DKD progression.

Methods: We evaluated the effect of a pharmacist-led intervention focused on supporting healthy behaviors, medication management, and self-monitoring on decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) for 36 months compared with an educational control.

Results: We randomized 138 individuals to the intervention group and 143 to control. At baseline, mean (SD) eGFR was 80.7 (21.7) mL/min/1.73m 2 , 56% of participants had chronic kidney disease and a history of uncontrolled hypertension with a baseline SBP of 134.3 mm Hg. The mean (SD) decline in eGFR by cystatin C from baseline to 36 months was 5.0 (19.6) and 5.9 (18.6) mL/min/1.73m 2 for the control and intervention groups, respectively, with no significant between-group difference ( P =0.75).

Conclusions: We did not observe a significant difference in clinical outcomes by study arm. However, we showed that individuals with DKD will engage in a pharmacist-led intervention. The potential explanations for a lack of change in DKD risk factors can be attributed to 5 broad issues, challenges: (1) associated with enrolling patients with low eGFR and poor BP control; (2) implementing the intervention; (3) limited duration during which to observe any clinical benefit from the intervention; (4) potential co-intervention or contamination; and (5) low statistical power.

糖尿病肾病高危初级保健患者的临床疗效:方法学挑战与 STOP-DKD 研究结果。
背景/目的:减缓糖尿病肾病(DKD)的进展至关重要。我们开展了一项随机对照试验,针对导致糖尿病肾病恶化的风险因素进行干预:与教育对照组相比,我们评估了以药剂师为主导的干预措施在 36 个月内对估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)下降的影响,干预措施侧重于支持健康行为、药物管理和自我监测:我们将 138 人随机分配到干预组,将 143 人随机分配到对照组。基线时,eGFR 的平均值(标清)为 80.7 (21.7) mL/min/1.73m2 ,56% 的参与者患有慢性肾脏疾病和未控制的高血压病史,基线 SBP 为 134.3 mm Hg。对照组和干预组的胱抑素 C eGFR 从基线到 36 个月的平均(标度)降幅分别为 5.0 (19.6) 和 5.9 (18.6) mL/min/1.73m2 ,组间差异不显著(P=0.75):我们没有观察到不同研究组的临床结果有明显差异。结论:我们没有观察到不同研究组的临床结果有明显差异,但我们表明,患有 DKD 的人会参与药剂师指导的干预。DKD 风险因素未发生变化的潜在原因可归结为以下 5 大问题和挑战:(1)与招募 eGFR 低和血压控制不佳的患者有关;(2)干预措施的实施;(3)观察干预措施临床获益的时间有限;(4)潜在的共同干预或污染;以及(5)统计能力较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Care
Medical Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
228
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信