Prolonged Fatigue and Mental Health Challenges in Critical COVID-19 Survivors.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Malin Hultgren, Ingrid Didriksson, Anders Håkansson, Sara Andertun, Attila Frigyesi, Erik Mellerstedt, Maria Nelderup, Anna C Nilsson, Anton Reepalu, Martin Spångfors, Hans Friberg, Gisela Lilja
{"title":"Prolonged Fatigue and Mental Health Challenges in Critical COVID-19 Survivors.","authors":"Malin Hultgren, Ingrid Didriksson, Anders Håkansson, Sara Andertun, Attila Frigyesi, Erik Mellerstedt, Maria Nelderup, Anna C Nilsson, Anton Reepalu, Martin Spångfors, Hans Friberg, Gisela Lilja","doi":"10.1177/08850666241255328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The aim of this study was to investigate the development of fatigue and mental illness between 3 and 12 months after critical COVID-19 and explore risk factors for long-lasting symptoms. <b>Study Design and Methods:</b> A prospective, multicenter COVID-19 study in southern Sweden, including adult patients (≥18 years) with rtPCR-confirmed COVID-19 requiring intensive care. Survivors were invited to a follow-up at 3 and 12 months, where patient-reported symptoms were assessed using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist version 5 (PCL-5). The development between 3 and 12 months was described by changes in relation to statistical significance and suggested values for a minimally important difference (MID). Potential risk factors for long-lasting symptoms were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression. <b>Results:</b> At the 3-month follow-up, 262 survivors (87%) participated, 215 (72%) returned at 12 months. Fatigue was reported by 50% versus 40%, with a significant improvement at 12 months (MFIS; median 38 vs. 33, <i>P </i>< .001, MID ≥4). There were no significant differences in symptoms of mental illness between 3 and 12 months, with anxiety present in 33% versus 28%, depression in 30% versus 22%, and posttraumatic stress disorder in 17% versus 13%. A worse functional outcome and less sleep compared to before COVID-19 were risk factors for fatigue and mental illness at 12 months. <b>Conclusions:</b> Fatigue improved between 3 and 12 months but was still common. Symptoms of mental illness remained unchanged with anxiety being the most reported. A worse functional outcome and less sleep compared to before COVID-19 were identified as risk factors for reporting long-lasting symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241255328","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the development of fatigue and mental illness between 3 and 12 months after critical COVID-19 and explore risk factors for long-lasting symptoms. Study Design and Methods: A prospective, multicenter COVID-19 study in southern Sweden, including adult patients (≥18 years) with rtPCR-confirmed COVID-19 requiring intensive care. Survivors were invited to a follow-up at 3 and 12 months, where patient-reported symptoms were assessed using the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist version 5 (PCL-5). The development between 3 and 12 months was described by changes in relation to statistical significance and suggested values for a minimally important difference (MID). Potential risk factors for long-lasting symptoms were analyzed by multivariable logistic regression. Results: At the 3-month follow-up, 262 survivors (87%) participated, 215 (72%) returned at 12 months. Fatigue was reported by 50% versus 40%, with a significant improvement at 12 months (MFIS; median 38 vs. 33, P < .001, MID ≥4). There were no significant differences in symptoms of mental illness between 3 and 12 months, with anxiety present in 33% versus 28%, depression in 30% versus 22%, and posttraumatic stress disorder in 17% versus 13%. A worse functional outcome and less sleep compared to before COVID-19 were risk factors for fatigue and mental illness at 12 months. Conclusions: Fatigue improved between 3 and 12 months but was still common. Symptoms of mental illness remained unchanged with anxiety being the most reported. A worse functional outcome and less sleep compared to before COVID-19 were identified as risk factors for reporting long-lasting symptoms.

COVID-19 重症幸存者的长期疲劳和心理健康挑战。
研究背景本研究旨在调查 COVID-19 重症后 3 至 12 个月内疲劳和精神疾病的发展情况,并探讨导致症状长期存在的风险因素。研究设计与方法:在瑞典南部进行的一项前瞻性多中心 COVID-19 研究,包括需要重症监护的 rtPCR 证实为 COVID-19 的成年患者(≥18 岁)。幸存者应邀参加了 3 个月和 12 个月的随访,并使用改良疲劳影响量表 (MFIS)、医院焦虑抑郁量表 (HADS) 和创伤后应激障碍核对表第 5 版 (PCL-5) 对患者报告的症状进行了评估。3 个月至 12 个月期间的发展情况通过与统计显著性和最小重要差异(MID)建议值相关的变化进行描述。通过多变量逻辑回归分析了导致症状长期存在的潜在风险因素。结果显示在 3 个月的随访中,有 262 名幸存者(87%)参加,其中 215 人(72%)在 12 个月后重返。报告疲劳的比例为 50%对 40%,在 12 个月时有显著改善(MFIS;中位数 38 对 33,P 结论):疲劳在 3 至 12 个月期间有所改善,但仍很常见。精神疾病的症状保持不变,焦虑是最常见的症状。与 COVID-19 之前相比,功能性结果更差和睡眠更少被认为是报告长期症状的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信