Maximin Fair Allocation of Indivisible Items under Cost Utilities

Sirin Botan, Angus Ritossa, Mashbat Suzuki, Toby Walsh
{"title":"Maximin Fair Allocation of Indivisible Items under Cost Utilities","authors":"Sirin Botan, Angus Ritossa, Mashbat Suzuki, Toby Walsh","doi":"arxiv-2407.13171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the problem of fairly allocating indivisible goods among a set of\nagents. Our focus is on the existence of allocations that give each agent their\nmaximin fair share--the value they are guaranteed if they divide the goods into\nas many bundles as there are agents, and receive their lowest valued bundle. An\nMMS allocation is one where every agent receives at least their maximin fair\nshare. We examine the existence of such allocations when agents have cost\nutilities. In this setting, each item has an associated cost, and an agent's\nvaluation for an item is the cost of the item if it is useful to them, and zero\notherwise. Our main results indicate that cost utilities are a promising restriction for\nachieving MMS. We show that for the case of three agents with cost utilities,\nan MMS allocation always exists. We also show that when preferences are\nrestricted slightly further--to what we call laminar set approvals--we can\nguarantee MMS allocations for any number of agents. Finally, we explore if it\nis possible to guarantee each agent their maximin fair share while using a\nstrategyproof mechanism.","PeriodicalId":501316,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.13171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study the problem of fairly allocating indivisible goods among a set of agents. Our focus is on the existence of allocations that give each agent their maximin fair share--the value they are guaranteed if they divide the goods into as many bundles as there are agents, and receive their lowest valued bundle. An MMS allocation is one where every agent receives at least their maximin fair share. We examine the existence of such allocations when agents have cost utilities. In this setting, each item has an associated cost, and an agent's valuation for an item is the cost of the item if it is useful to them, and zero otherwise. Our main results indicate that cost utilities are a promising restriction for achieving MMS. We show that for the case of three agents with cost utilities, an MMS allocation always exists. We also show that when preferences are restricted slightly further--to what we call laminar set approvals--we can guarantee MMS allocations for any number of agents. Finally, we explore if it is possible to guarantee each agent their maximin fair share while using a strategyproof mechanism.
成本公用事业下不可分割项目的最大公平分配
我们研究的是在一组代理人之间公平分配不可分割物品的问题。我们关注的重点是,是否存在能让每个代理人获得最大公平份额的分配--即如果他们把商品分成与代理人数量相同的多个捆绑包,并获得价值最低的捆绑包,他们所能保证的价值。MMS分配是指每个代理人至少都能得到他们的最大公平份额。我们研究了代理人具有成本效用时是否存在这种分配。在这种情况下,每个物品都有一个相关的成本,如果物品对代理人有用,代理人对物品的评价就是物品的成本,否则就是零。我们的主要结果表明,成本效用是实现 MMS 的一个很有前景的限制条件。我们证明,在三个代理人都具有成本效用的情况下,MMS 分配总是存在的。我们还证明,当偏好稍有限制--我们称之为层叠集批准--我们可以保证任何数量的代理都能获得 MMS 分配。最后,我们探讨了是否有可能在使用防策略机制的同时,保证每个代理的最大公平份额。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信