Stability and genetic parameters for cassava yield attributes in the tropical humid region of Brazil

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Juraci Souza Sampaio Filho, Marcos de Souza Campos, Eder Jorge de Oliveira
{"title":"Stability and genetic parameters for cassava yield attributes in the tropical humid region of Brazil","authors":"Juraci Souza Sampaio Filho, Marcos de Souza Campos, Eder Jorge de Oliveira","doi":"10.1007/s10681-024-03384-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The performance differences in cassava genotypes arising from genotype vs. environment interactions (G × E) often lead to responses that are significantly lower than expected for selection. The objective of this study was to evaluate different stability methods, both parametric and non-parametric, such as additive main-effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI), main effect of genotypes plus G × E (GGE), and weighted average of absolute scores (WAASB), in order to quantify the G × E in multi-environmental trials. A total of 12 genotypes were assessed across 12 environments using a completely randomized block design, with three replicates for traits such as fresh root yield (FRY) and dry matter content in the roots (DMC). The data were subjected to analysis of variance and the Scott Knott test (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The sum of squares (SQ) of genotypes, environment, and G × E effects were equally distributed for FRY, whereas for DMC, these effects accounted for 64.1%, 21.9%, and 13.8% of the SQ, respectively, indicating a lower environmental effect on this characteristic. Using the AMMI, GGE, and WAASB methods, genotypes with high agronomic performance and stability for FRY (BR11-34–41 and BR11-34–69) (&gt; 32 t ha<sup>−1</sup>) and DMC (BRS Novo Horizonte, BR12-107–002, and BR11-24–156) (&gt; 37%) were identified. The broad-sense heritability (<span>\\({h}^{2}\\)</span>) for FRY and DMC was estimated to be 0.45 and 0.75, respectively. Approximately 72% of the methods identified BRS Novo Horizonte as the genotype with the highest stability and performance for DMC, while 47% identified genotypes BR11-34–41 and BR11-34–69 for FRY and intermediate DMC. Genotype BR11-24–156 exhibited high static stability according to 50% of the methods. Significant correlations were observed between stability and agronomic performance across the different methods, enabling the formation of groups based on stability concepts. Additionally, it was found that two mega-environments existed for FRY, whereas DMC displayed a single mega-environment with similar patterns, indicating an absence of G × E. We identified superior genotypes that could be promoted to national performance trials to develop stable cultivars with better yield attributes in cassava.</p>","PeriodicalId":11803,"journal":{"name":"Euphytica","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Euphytica","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-024-03384-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance differences in cassava genotypes arising from genotype vs. environment interactions (G × E) often lead to responses that are significantly lower than expected for selection. The objective of this study was to evaluate different stability methods, both parametric and non-parametric, such as additive main-effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI), main effect of genotypes plus G × E (GGE), and weighted average of absolute scores (WAASB), in order to quantify the G × E in multi-environmental trials. A total of 12 genotypes were assessed across 12 environments using a completely randomized block design, with three replicates for traits such as fresh root yield (FRY) and dry matter content in the roots (DMC). The data were subjected to analysis of variance and the Scott Knott test (p < 0.05). The sum of squares (SQ) of genotypes, environment, and G × E effects were equally distributed for FRY, whereas for DMC, these effects accounted for 64.1%, 21.9%, and 13.8% of the SQ, respectively, indicating a lower environmental effect on this characteristic. Using the AMMI, GGE, and WAASB methods, genotypes with high agronomic performance and stability for FRY (BR11-34–41 and BR11-34–69) (> 32 t ha−1) and DMC (BRS Novo Horizonte, BR12-107–002, and BR11-24–156) (> 37%) were identified. The broad-sense heritability (\({h}^{2}\)) for FRY and DMC was estimated to be 0.45 and 0.75, respectively. Approximately 72% of the methods identified BRS Novo Horizonte as the genotype with the highest stability and performance for DMC, while 47% identified genotypes BR11-34–41 and BR11-34–69 for FRY and intermediate DMC. Genotype BR11-24–156 exhibited high static stability according to 50% of the methods. Significant correlations were observed between stability and agronomic performance across the different methods, enabling the formation of groups based on stability concepts. Additionally, it was found that two mega-environments existed for FRY, whereas DMC displayed a single mega-environment with similar patterns, indicating an absence of G × E. We identified superior genotypes that could be promoted to national performance trials to develop stable cultivars with better yield attributes in cassava.

Abstract Image

巴西热带潮湿地区木薯产量属性的稳定性和遗传参数
基因型与环境的交互作用(G × E)导致木薯基因型的表现差异,这种差异往往会使木薯的响应明显低于选择的预期。本研究的目的是评估不同的参数和非参数稳定性方法,如加法主效应和乘法交互作用(AMMI)、基因型主效应加 G × E(GGE)和绝对得分加权平均(WAASB),以量化多环境试验中的 G × E。采用完全随机区组设计,对 12 种环境中的 12 个基因型进行了评估,对新鲜根产量(FRY)和根中干物质含量(DMC)等性状进行了三次重复。对数据进行了方差分析和斯科特-诺特检验(p < 0.05)。在 FRY 方面,基因型、环境和 G × E 效应的平方和(SQ)分布相等,而在 DMC 方面,这些效应分别占 SQ 的 64.1%、21.9% 和 13.8%,表明环境对这一特性的影响较小。利用 AMMI、GGE 和 WAASB 方法,确定了 FRY(BR11-34-41 和 BR11-34-69)(> 32 t ha-1)和 DMC(BRS Novo Horizonte、BR12-107-002 和 BR11-24-156)(> 37%)农艺性状和稳定性较高的基因型。据估计,FRY 和 DMC 的广义遗传率(\({h}^{2}\))分别为 0.45 和 0.75。约 72% 的方法确定 BRS Novo Horizonte 为 DMC 稳定性和表现最高的基因型,47% 的方法确定 BR11-34-41 和 BR11-34-69 为 FRY 和中等 DMC 的基因型。根据 50% 的方法,基因型 BR11-24-156 表现出较高的静态稳定性。在不同的方法中,稳定性和农艺表现之间存在显著的相关性,因此可以根据稳定性概念进行分组。此外,我们还发现 FRY 存在两个巨型环境,而 DMC 则只有一个巨型环境,且模式相似,表明不存在 G × E。我们确定了可推广到国家性能试验中的优良基因型,以培育具有更好产量属性的木薯稳定栽培品种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Euphytica
Euphytica 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
157
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Euphytica is an international journal on theoretical and applied aspects of plant breeding. It publishes critical reviews and papers on the results of original research related to plant breeding. The integration of modern and traditional plant breeding is a growing field of research using transgenic crop plants and/or marker assisted breeding in combination with traditional breeding tools. The content should cover the interests of researchers directly or indirectly involved in plant breeding, at universities, breeding institutes, seed industries, plant biotech companies and industries using plant raw materials, and promote stability, adaptability and sustainability in agriculture and agro-industries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信