“We have to fight for our existence in the system”: exploring service providers’ experiences with male victims and female perpetrators of intimate partner violence

IF 2.1 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Giulia Pisano, B. Kennath Widanaralalage, Dominic Willmott
{"title":"“We have to fight for our existence in the system”: exploring service providers’ experiences with male victims and female perpetrators of intimate partner violence","authors":"Giulia Pisano, B. Kennath Widanaralalage, Dominic Willmott","doi":"10.1108/jcp-04-2024-0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to investigate the experiences of service providers supporting male victims and female perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV). The study explored the drivers, methods and treatments of female-perpetrated IPV, the nature and impact of abuse towards male victims, the barriers and facilitators to service provision and the impact on the practitioners themselves.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The study used a qualitative approach, using reflexive thematic analysis to analyse semi-structured interviews with 13 experienced service providers.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Two overarching themes were identified: systemic issues in service provision, including challenges with multi-agency approaches, funding and availability of services and the impact on practitioners; and gender stereotypes, which created barriers to male victims' help-seeking and influenced the treatment of female perpetrators.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The findings suggest the need for a multi-level approach, addressing gendered inequalities in IPV policy and funding, implementing gender-inclusive, evidence-based and trauma-informed practices, and raising public and professional awareness to challenge the dominant “domestic violence stereotype”.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study provides a detailed, in-depth exploration of the experiences of service providers supporting “non-typical” populations in IPV, revealing the complex, multi-faceted challenges they face within a system that is inherently designed to support female victims of male perpetrators.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":44013,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Criminal Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Criminal Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jcp-04-2024-0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to investigate the experiences of service providers supporting male victims and female perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV). The study explored the drivers, methods and treatments of female-perpetrated IPV, the nature and impact of abuse towards male victims, the barriers and facilitators to service provision and the impact on the practitioners themselves.

Design/methodology/approach

The study used a qualitative approach, using reflexive thematic analysis to analyse semi-structured interviews with 13 experienced service providers.

Findings

Two overarching themes were identified: systemic issues in service provision, including challenges with multi-agency approaches, funding and availability of services and the impact on practitioners; and gender stereotypes, which created barriers to male victims' help-seeking and influenced the treatment of female perpetrators.

Practical implications

The findings suggest the need for a multi-level approach, addressing gendered inequalities in IPV policy and funding, implementing gender-inclusive, evidence-based and trauma-informed practices, and raising public and professional awareness to challenge the dominant “domestic violence stereotype”.

Originality/value

This study provides a detailed, in-depth exploration of the experiences of service providers supporting “non-typical” populations in IPV, revealing the complex, multi-faceted challenges they face within a system that is inherently designed to support female victims of male perpetrators.

"我们必须为我们在系统中的存在而斗争":探讨服务提供者与亲密伴侣暴力的男性受害者和女性施暴者的经历
目的 本研究旨在调查为亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的男性受害者和女性施暴者提供支持的服务提供者的经验。该研究探讨了女性实施 IPV 的驱动因素、方法和处理方式,虐待男性受害者的性质和影响,提供服务的障碍和促进因素,以及对从业人员自身的影响。该研究采用定性方法,使用反思性主题分析法对 13 名经验丰富的服务提供者进行的半结构化访谈进行分析。研究结果确定了两个首要主题:服务提供中的系统性问题,包括多机构方法、资金和服务可用性方面的挑战以及对从业人员的影响;性别陈规定型观念,这对男性受害者寻求帮助造成了障碍,并影响了对女性施暴者的处理。实践意义研究结果表明,有必要采取多层次的方法,解决 IPV 政策和资金中的性别不平等问题,实施性别包容、循证和创伤知情的实践,并提高公众和专业人士的意识,以挑战占主导地位的 "家庭暴力刻板印象"。原创性/价值本研究详细、深入地探讨了为 IPV 中的 "非典型 "人群提供支持的服务提供者的经验,揭示了他们在一个本来就是为男性施暴者的女性受害者提供支持的系统中所面临的复杂、多方面的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Criminal Psychology
Journal of Criminal Psychology CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信