Model of Surface Subsidence of Pyroclastic Flow: the August 29, 2019 Shiveluch Volcano Eruption, Kamchatka

IF 0.9 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
M. S. Volkova, V. O. Mikhailov
{"title":"Model of Surface Subsidence of Pyroclastic Flow: the August 29, 2019 Shiveluch Volcano Eruption, Kamchatka","authors":"M. S. Volkova,&nbsp;V. O. Mikhailov","doi":"10.1134/S1069351324700472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Abstract</b>—Possible causes of surface subsidence of the pyroclastic flow formed on the slopes of the Shiveluch volcano, Kamchatka, during the eruption on August 29, 2019 are studied. A series of InSAR (Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar) images from acquisitions by the European Space Agency Sentinel-1A satellite for a period from May to October in 2020 and 2021 are used to construct maps of the displacement rates of the volcano surface. An area with large subsidence coinciding with the area of pyroclastic flow is revealed on the volcano’s southeastern slope. The maximum subsidence rates are found to be 385 mm/year in 2020 and 257 mm/year in 2021. The thickness of the pyroclastic deposits is estimated from radar images for 2020. The dependence of the subsidence rate on flow thickness has a significant scatter with a rather high correlation coefficient (‒0.69). A thermomechanical model has been constructed, which takes into account compaction of the deposited material due to changes in porosity and density over time. According to the model, to explain the dependence of the subsidence rate of the flow surface on the thickness of rocks, it is sufficient to assume that in addition to surface subsidence, flow cooling was accompanied by a small change in porosity occurred, which, depending on the initial flow temperature, made up to 1.5 to 1.7% for the period from 2019 to 2021. The scatter in the relationship “subsidence rate versus flow thickness” is explained for by the erosion of pyroclastic deposits.</p>","PeriodicalId":602,"journal":{"name":"Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S1069351324700472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract—Possible causes of surface subsidence of the pyroclastic flow formed on the slopes of the Shiveluch volcano, Kamchatka, during the eruption on August 29, 2019 are studied. A series of InSAR (Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar) images from acquisitions by the European Space Agency Sentinel-1A satellite for a period from May to October in 2020 and 2021 are used to construct maps of the displacement rates of the volcano surface. An area with large subsidence coinciding with the area of pyroclastic flow is revealed on the volcano’s southeastern slope. The maximum subsidence rates are found to be 385 mm/year in 2020 and 257 mm/year in 2021. The thickness of the pyroclastic deposits is estimated from radar images for 2020. The dependence of the subsidence rate on flow thickness has a significant scatter with a rather high correlation coefficient (‒0.69). A thermomechanical model has been constructed, which takes into account compaction of the deposited material due to changes in porosity and density over time. According to the model, to explain the dependence of the subsidence rate of the flow surface on the thickness of rocks, it is sufficient to assume that in addition to surface subsidence, flow cooling was accompanied by a small change in porosity occurred, which, depending on the initial flow temperature, made up to 1.5 to 1.7% for the period from 2019 to 2021. The scatter in the relationship “subsidence rate versus flow thickness” is explained for by the erosion of pyroclastic deposits.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

火成碎屑流地表下沉模型:2019 年 8 月 29 日堪察加希维鲁奇火山喷发
摘要--研究了2019年8月29日堪察加希维鲁奇火山喷发期间在火山斜坡上形成的火成碎屑流地表下沉的可能原因。利用欧洲航天局哨兵-1A 卫星在 2020 年和 2021 年 5 月至 10 月期间采集的一系列 InSAR(干涉合成孔径雷达)图像,绘制了火山表面位移速率图。在火山东南斜坡上发现了一个与火成碎屑流区域相吻合的大面积下沉区域。2020 年和 2021 年的最大下沉率分别为 385 毫米/年和 257 毫米/年。根据雷达图像估算出了 2020 年的火成碎屑沉积厚度。沉降率与岩流厚度的相关系数(-0.69)相当高,但有明显的分散性。已构建了一个热力学模型,其中考虑到了沉积物因孔隙率和密度随时间变化而产生的压实作用。根据该模型,要解释流体表面下沉率与岩石厚度的关系,只需假定除表面下沉外,流体冷却还伴随着孔隙率的微小变化。"下沉率与流动厚度 "关系中的散点可以用火成岩沉积物的侵蚀来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth
Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
30.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Izvestiya, Physics of the Solid Earth is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes results of original theoretical and experimental research in relevant areas of the physics of the Earth''s interior and applied geophysics. The journal welcomes manuscripts from all countries in the English or Russian language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信