The hidden value of MRI: modifying treatment decisions in C-spine injuries

Niklas Rutsch, Florian Schmaranzer, Pascale Amrein, Martin Müller, Christoph E. Albers, Sebastian F. Bigdon
{"title":"The hidden value of MRI: modifying treatment decisions in C-spine injuries","authors":"Niklas Rutsch, Florian Schmaranzer, Pascale Amrein, Martin Müller, Christoph E. Albers, Sebastian F. Bigdon","doi":"10.1186/s13049-024-01235-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computed Tomography (CT) is the gold standard for cervical spine (c-spine) evaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) emerges due to its increasing availability and the lack of radiation exposure. However, MRI is costly and time-consuming, questioning its role in the emergency department (ED). This study investigates the added the value of an additional MRI for patients presenting with a c-spine injury in the ED. We conducted a retrospective monocenter cohort study that included all patients with neck trauma presenting in the ED, who received imaging based on the NEXUS criteria. Spine surgeons performed a full-case review to classify each case into “c-spine injured” and “c-spine uninjured”. Injuries were classified according to the AO Spine classification. We assessed patients with a c-spine injury detected by CT, who received a subsequent MRI. In this subset, injuries were classified separately in both imaging modalities. We monitored the treatment changes after the additional MRI to evaluate characteristics of this cohort and the impact of the AO Spine Neurology/Modifier modifiers. We identified 4496 subjects, 2321 were eligible for inclusion and 186 were diagnosed with c-spine injuries in the retrospective case review. Fifty-six patients with a c-spine injury initially identified through CT received an additional MRI. The additional MRI significantly extended (geometric mean ratio 1.32, p < 0.001) the duration of the patients’ stay in the ED. Of this cohort, 25% had a change in treatment strategy and among the patients with neurological symptoms (AON ≥ 1), 45.8% experienced a change in treatment. Patients that were N-positive, had a 12.4 (95% CI 2.7–90.7, p < 0.01) times higher odds of a treatment change after an additional MRI than neurologically intact patients. Our study suggests that patients with a c-spine injury and neurological symptoms benefit from an additional MRI. In neurologically intact patients, an additional MRI retains value only when carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis.","PeriodicalId":501057,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-024-01235-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Computed Tomography (CT) is the gold standard for cervical spine (c-spine) evaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) emerges due to its increasing availability and the lack of radiation exposure. However, MRI is costly and time-consuming, questioning its role in the emergency department (ED). This study investigates the added the value of an additional MRI for patients presenting with a c-spine injury in the ED. We conducted a retrospective monocenter cohort study that included all patients with neck trauma presenting in the ED, who received imaging based on the NEXUS criteria. Spine surgeons performed a full-case review to classify each case into “c-spine injured” and “c-spine uninjured”. Injuries were classified according to the AO Spine classification. We assessed patients with a c-spine injury detected by CT, who received a subsequent MRI. In this subset, injuries were classified separately in both imaging modalities. We monitored the treatment changes after the additional MRI to evaluate characteristics of this cohort and the impact of the AO Spine Neurology/Modifier modifiers. We identified 4496 subjects, 2321 were eligible for inclusion and 186 were diagnosed with c-spine injuries in the retrospective case review. Fifty-six patients with a c-spine injury initially identified through CT received an additional MRI. The additional MRI significantly extended (geometric mean ratio 1.32, p < 0.001) the duration of the patients’ stay in the ED. Of this cohort, 25% had a change in treatment strategy and among the patients with neurological symptoms (AON ≥ 1), 45.8% experienced a change in treatment. Patients that were N-positive, had a 12.4 (95% CI 2.7–90.7, p < 0.01) times higher odds of a treatment change after an additional MRI than neurologically intact patients. Our study suggests that patients with a c-spine injury and neurological symptoms benefit from an additional MRI. In neurologically intact patients, an additional MRI retains value only when carefully evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
磁共振成像的隐藏价值:改变脊柱损伤的治疗决策
计算机断层扫描(CT)是评估颈椎的黄金标准。磁共振成像(MRI)因其日益普及且无辐射而兴起。然而,核磁共振成像既昂贵又耗时,这就对其在急诊科(ED)中的作用提出了质疑。本研究探讨了在急诊科对脊柱损伤患者进行额外核磁共振成像检查的附加价值。我们进行了一项回顾性单中心队列研究,纳入了所有在急诊科就诊的颈部创伤患者,他们都根据 NEXUS 标准接受了成像检查。脊柱外科医生对病例进行了全面审查,将每个病例分为 "颈椎受伤 "和 "颈椎未受伤 "两类。损伤根据 AO 脊柱分类法进行分类。我们评估了通过 CT 检测到 c 型脊柱损伤并随后接受了 MRI 检查的患者。在这一子集中,两种成像模式分别对损伤进行分类。我们对额外核磁共振成像后的治疗变化进行了监测,以评估该群体的特征以及 AO 脊柱神经学/调节器修饰符的影响。我们确定了 4496 名受试者,其中 2321 人符合纳入条件,186 人在回顾性病例审查中被诊断为 c 型脊柱损伤。最初通过 CT 确定为 c 型脊柱损伤的 56 名患者接受了额外的 MRI 检查。额外的核磁共振成像大大延长了患者在急诊室的住院时间(几何平均比为 1.32,P < 0.001)。其中,25%的患者改变了治疗策略,在有神经症状(AON ≥ 1)的患者中,45.8%的患者改变了治疗策略。与神经功能完好的患者相比,N阳性患者在接受一次额外的磁共振成像检查后改变治疗方案的几率要高出12.4倍(95% CI 2.7-90.7,p < 0.01)。我们的研究表明,有脊柱损伤和神经症状的患者可从额外的核磁共振成像中获益。对于神经系统完好的患者,只有根据具体情况进行仔细评估后,额外磁共振成像才有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信