Self-doubt and self-regulation: A systematic literature review of the factors affecting academic cheating in online learning environments

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Daniel Kangwa, Mgambi Msambwa Msafiri, Xiulan Wan, Antony Fute
{"title":"Self-doubt and self-regulation: A systematic literature review of the factors affecting academic cheating in online learning environments","authors":"Daniel Kangwa, Mgambi Msambwa Msafiri, Xiulan Wan, Antony Fute","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09939-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Online and computer-assisted learning have become widespread in the rapidly evolving education landscape. However, these learning modalities uniquely challenge academic integrity, escalating the potential for academic cheating. This systematic review used thematic and narrative syntheses to examine the relationships and the effects of self-doubt and self-regulation on academic cheating in online and computer-assisted learning environments. It involved a sample of 93 peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 1998 and 2023 across five electronic databases adhering to the principles of the PRISMA framework. Findings reveal that different emotional, motivational, and cognitive factors act as primary mediators, while the individual, situational, and environmental factors were significant moderators. These findings underscore the context-dependent and inconsistent effects of self-doubt and self-regulation on academic cheating. Notably, while self-doubt and self-regulation exert opposing influences on academic cheating, other factors, such as gender, culture, performance, feedback, peer pressure, and proctoring, significantly modify these effects. Hence, the relationship between self-doubt, self-regulation, and academic cheating in online and computer-aided learning is thus intricate and dynamic, depending upon various individual, situational, and contextual elements that shape students’ motivation, emotions, and cognition. Therefore, this study contributes to the broader discourse on online and computer-aided learning by offering strategies to prevent and reduce academic cheating. Recommendations include promoting self-regulation, reducing self-doubt, focusing on specific mediators and moderators, and utilizing different resources and techniques to measure and identify academic cheating. The results underline the importance of a concerted, multi-faceted approach to upholding academic integrity in the era of digital learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09939-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online and computer-assisted learning have become widespread in the rapidly evolving education landscape. However, these learning modalities uniquely challenge academic integrity, escalating the potential for academic cheating. This systematic review used thematic and narrative syntheses to examine the relationships and the effects of self-doubt and self-regulation on academic cheating in online and computer-assisted learning environments. It involved a sample of 93 peer-reviewed empirical studies published between 1998 and 2023 across five electronic databases adhering to the principles of the PRISMA framework. Findings reveal that different emotional, motivational, and cognitive factors act as primary mediators, while the individual, situational, and environmental factors were significant moderators. These findings underscore the context-dependent and inconsistent effects of self-doubt and self-regulation on academic cheating. Notably, while self-doubt and self-regulation exert opposing influences on academic cheating, other factors, such as gender, culture, performance, feedback, peer pressure, and proctoring, significantly modify these effects. Hence, the relationship between self-doubt, self-regulation, and academic cheating in online and computer-aided learning is thus intricate and dynamic, depending upon various individual, situational, and contextual elements that shape students’ motivation, emotions, and cognition. Therefore, this study contributes to the broader discourse on online and computer-aided learning by offering strategies to prevent and reduce academic cheating. Recommendations include promoting self-regulation, reducing self-doubt, focusing on specific mediators and moderators, and utilizing different resources and techniques to measure and identify academic cheating. The results underline the importance of a concerted, multi-faceted approach to upholding academic integrity in the era of digital learning.

Abstract Image

自我怀疑与自我调节:影响在线学习环境中学术作弊因素的系统性文献综述
在线学习和计算机辅助学习已在快速发展的教育领域中得到广泛应用。然而,这些学习方式对学术诚信提出了独特的挑战,增加了学术作弊的可能性。本系统性综述采用专题和叙事综合法,研究了自我怀疑和自我调节对在线和计算机辅助学习环境中学术作弊的关系和影响。该综述涉及五个电子数据库中 1998 年至 2023 年间发表的 93 篇经同行评审的实证研究样本,并遵循了 PRISMA 框架的原则。研究结果表明,不同的情感、动机和认知因素是主要的中介因素,而个人、情景和环境因素则是重要的调节因素。这些研究结果表明,自我怀疑和自我调节对学术作弊的影响与情境有关,且不一致。值得注意的是,虽然自我怀疑和自我调节对学术作弊的影响是相反的,但其他因素,如性别、文化、成绩、反馈、同伴压力和监考等,都会显著改变这些影响。因此,在在线学习和计算机辅助学习中,自我怀疑、自我调节与学术作弊之间的关系是错综复杂和动态的,取决于塑造学生动机、情感和认知的各种个体、情景和背景因素。因此,本研究通过提供预防和减少学术作弊的策略,为在线学习和计算机辅助学习的广泛讨论做出了贡献。建议包括促进自我调节、减少自我怀疑、关注特定的中介和调节因素,以及利用不同的资源和技术来衡量和识别学术作弊。研究结果凸显了在数字化学习时代采取协调一致、多管齐下的方法来维护学术诚信的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Psychology of Education
Social Psychology of Education PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The field of social psychology spans the boundary between the disciplines of psychology and sociology and has traditionally been associated with empirical research. Many studies of human behaviour in education are conducted by persons who identify with social psychology or whose work falls into the social psychological ambit. Several textbooks have been published and a variety of courses are being offered on the `social psychology of education'', but no journal has hitherto appeared to cover the field. Social Psychology of Education fills this gap, covering a wide variety of content concerns, theoretical interests and research methods, among which are: Content concerns: classroom instruction decision making in education educational innovation concerns for gender, race, ethnicity and social class knowledge creation, transmission and effects leadership in schools and school systems long-term effects of instructional processes micropolitics of schools student cultures and interactions teacher recruitment and careers teacher- student relations Theoretical interests: achievement motivation attitude theory attribution theory conflict management and the learning of pro-social behaviour cultural and social capital discourse analysis group dynamics role theory social exchange theory social transition social learning theory status attainment symbolic interaction the study of organisations Research methods: comparative research experiments formal observations historical studies literature reviews panel studies qualitative methods sample surveys For social psychologists with a special interest in educational matters, educational researchers with a social psychological approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信