Frontiers | Predicting Antibody and ACE2 Affinity for SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 and JN.1 with In Silico Protein Modeling and Docking

IF 2 Q4 VIROLOGY
Shirish Yasa, Sayal Guirales-Medrano, Denis Jacob Machado, Colby Ford, Dan Janies
{"title":"Frontiers | Predicting Antibody and ACE2 Affinity for SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 and JN.1 with In Silico Protein Modeling and Docking","authors":"Shirish Yasa, Sayal Guirales-Medrano, Denis Jacob Machado, Colby Ford, Dan Janies","doi":"10.3389/fviro.2024.1419276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 lineages derived from Omicron, including BA.2.86 (nicknamed “Pirola”) and its relative, JN.1, has raised concerns about their potential impact on public and personal health due to numerous novel mutations. Despite this, predicting their implications based solely on mutation counts proves challenging. Empirical evidence of JN.1’s increased immune evasion capacity in relation to previous variants is mixed. To improve predictions beyond what is possible based solely on mutation counts, we conducted extensive in silico analyses on the binding affinity between the RBD of different SARS-CoV-2 variants (Wuhan-Hu-1, BA.1/B.1.1.529, BA.2, XBB.1.5, BA.2.86, and JN.1) and neutralizing antibodies from vaccinated or infected individuals, as well as the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor. We observed no statistically significant difference in binding affinity between BA.2.86 or JN.1 and other variants. Therefore, we conclude that the new SARS-CoV-2 variants have no pronounced immune escape or infection capacity compared to previous variants. However, minor reductions in binding affinity for both the antibodies and ACE2 were noted for JN.1. Future research in this area will benefit from increased structural analyses of memory B-cell derived antibodies and should emphasize the importance of choosing appropriate samples for in silico studies to assess protection provided by vaccination and infection. Moreover, the fitness benefits of genomic variation outside of the RBD of BA.2.86 and JN.1 need to be investigated. This research contributes to understanding the BA.2.86 and JN.1 variants’ potential impact on public health.","PeriodicalId":73114,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in virology","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in virology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fviro.2024.1419276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 lineages derived from Omicron, including BA.2.86 (nicknamed “Pirola”) and its relative, JN.1, has raised concerns about their potential impact on public and personal health due to numerous novel mutations. Despite this, predicting their implications based solely on mutation counts proves challenging. Empirical evidence of JN.1’s increased immune evasion capacity in relation to previous variants is mixed. To improve predictions beyond what is possible based solely on mutation counts, we conducted extensive in silico analyses on the binding affinity between the RBD of different SARS-CoV-2 variants (Wuhan-Hu-1, BA.1/B.1.1.529, BA.2, XBB.1.5, BA.2.86, and JN.1) and neutralizing antibodies from vaccinated or infected individuals, as well as the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor. We observed no statistically significant difference in binding affinity between BA.2.86 or JN.1 and other variants. Therefore, we conclude that the new SARS-CoV-2 variants have no pronounced immune escape or infection capacity compared to previous variants. However, minor reductions in binding affinity for both the antibodies and ACE2 were noted for JN.1. Future research in this area will benefit from increased structural analyses of memory B-cell derived antibodies and should emphasize the importance of choosing appropriate samples for in silico studies to assess protection provided by vaccination and infection. Moreover, the fitness benefits of genomic variation outside of the RBD of BA.2.86 and JN.1 need to be investigated. This research contributes to understanding the BA.2.86 and JN.1 variants’ potential impact on public health.
前沿|利用硅学蛋白质建模和对接预测 SARS-CoV-2 BA.2.86 和 JN.1 的抗体和 ACE2 亲和力
源于 Omicron 的 SARS-CoV-2 株系(包括 BA.2.86(昵称 "Pirola")及其近亲 JN.1)的出现引起了人们对其因大量新型突变而可能对公众和个人健康造成影响的担忧。尽管如此,仅根据突变数量来预测其影响仍具有挑战性。与以前的变异体相比,JN.1 的免疫逃避能力增强的经验证据不一。为了提高预测能力,我们对不同 SARS-CoV-2 变体(武汉-Hu-1、BA.1/B.1.1.529、BA.2、XBB.1.5、BA.2.86 和 JN.1)的 RBD 与接种疫苗或受感染者的中和抗体以及人类血管紧张素转换酶 2(ACE2)受体之间的结合亲和力进行了广泛的硅学分析。我们观察到,BA.2.86 或 JN.1 与其他变体的结合亲和力没有明显的统计学差异。因此,我们得出结论,与以前的变种相比,SARS-CoV-2 的新变种没有明显的免疫逃逸或感染能力。不过,我们注意到 JN.1 与抗体和 ACE2 的结合亲和力略有下降。未来该领域的研究将受益于对记忆性 B 细胞衍生抗体的更多结构分析,并应强调选择适当样本进行硅学研究的重要性,以评估疫苗接种和感染所提供的保护。此外,BA.2.86和JN.1的RBD之外的基因组变异对健康的益处也有待研究。这项研究有助于了解 BA.2.86 和 JN.1 变异对公共卫生的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信