Creating and enacting culturally responsive assessment for First Nations students in higher education settings

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Carly Steele, Graeme Gower, Tetiana Bogachenko
{"title":"Creating and enacting culturally responsive assessment for First Nations students in higher education settings","authors":"Carly Steele, Graeme Gower, Tetiana Bogachenko","doi":"10.1177/00049441241258496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we argue that current assessment practices in higher education require urgent examination and should be re-imagined in culturally responsive ways to ensure fairness for all. From sociocultural and social justice perspectives, we highlight examples of cultural and linguistic bias in assessment that disadvantages many First Nations students. Incorporating a constructivist viewpoint, we argue that assessment practices must keep pace with culturally responsive pedagogical practices to improve assessment validity for First Nations students and to maintain constructive alignment between learning, teaching, and assessment. Based on qualitative interviews with stakeholders in the On Country Teacher Education program, we describe how university lecturers changed their approaches to assessment and modified their assessment tasks to enact and create culturally responsive assessments. These practices, whilst beneficial for First Nations students, are viewed as being ‘responsive’ rather than ‘proactive’. Recommendations include shifting to a ‘proactive’ stance by evaluating the validity of student learning outcomes and assessment design from the onset.","PeriodicalId":46741,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Education","volume":"162 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441241258496","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we argue that current assessment practices in higher education require urgent examination and should be re-imagined in culturally responsive ways to ensure fairness for all. From sociocultural and social justice perspectives, we highlight examples of cultural and linguistic bias in assessment that disadvantages many First Nations students. Incorporating a constructivist viewpoint, we argue that assessment practices must keep pace with culturally responsive pedagogical practices to improve assessment validity for First Nations students and to maintain constructive alignment between learning, teaching, and assessment. Based on qualitative interviews with stakeholders in the On Country Teacher Education program, we describe how university lecturers changed their approaches to assessment and modified their assessment tasks to enact and create culturally responsive assessments. These practices, whilst beneficial for First Nations students, are viewed as being ‘responsive’ rather than ‘proactive’. Recommendations include shifting to a ‘proactive’ stance by evaluating the validity of student learning outcomes and assessment design from the onset.
在高等教育环境中为原住民学生创建和实施符合文化要求的评估
在这篇文章中,我们认为当前高等教育中的评估实践亟需审查,并应以文化响应的方式重新构想,以确保对所有人的公平。从社会文化和社会公正的角度出发,我们着重举例说明了评估中存在的文化和语言偏见,这些偏见使许多原住民学生处于不利地位。结合建构主义观点,我们认为评估实践必须与文化响应教学实践保持同步,以提高对原住民学生的评估有效性,并保持学习、教学和评估之间的建设性一致。根据对原住民教师教育项目相关人员的定性访谈,我们描述了大学讲师如何改变他们的评估方法,修改他们的评估任务,以制定和创建符合原住民文化的评估。这些做法虽然对原住民学生有益,但被视为 "顺应 "而非 "主动"。建议包括从一开始就评估学生学习成果和评估设计的有效性,从而转向 "积极主动 "的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Education
Australian Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Education was established in 1957 under the editorship of Professor Bill Connell. Drawing upon research conducted in Australia and internationally, the AJE aims to inform educational researchers as well as educators, administrators and policymakers about issues of contemporary concern in education. The AJE seeks to publish research studies that contribute to educational knowledge and research methodologies, and that review findings of research studies. Its scope embraces all fields of education and training. In addition to publishing research studies about education it also publishes articles that address education in relation to other fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信