Alexander Brodsky, Andreas Rausch, Jürgen Seifried
{"title":"Informal Learning in Business Internships in Higher Education – Findings from a Diary Study","authors":"Alexander Brodsky, Andreas Rausch, Jürgen Seifried","doi":"10.1007/s12186-024-09349-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Internships offer the opportunity to gain experience and skills by working in organisations or to establish a professional network, and there is empirical evidence of the positive effects of practical experience in higher education. However, there are only a few studies on the characteristics of workplace tasks that facilitate learning during internships. In this paper, we address this research gap by conducting a diary study to examine students' work tasks at the beginning and end of an eight-week business internship period, their perceptions of the tasks, and the influence of task characteristics on self-perceived learning. Analyses of approximately 2,000 work tasks documented by 51 students show that the frequencies of different work tasks did not differ substantially between the first and last week of the business internship. At both times of data collection, many students were engaged in organisational routine and administrative tasks, especially those with a domain-specific focus. However, the values for the assessment of task characteristics (such as challenge/difficulty) were higher at the beginning of the internship than towards the end. Causal analyses revealed that task characteristics such as novelty or feedback (from colleagues or supervisors) were positive predictors of self-perceived learning during both weeks, whereas the predictive power of other task features changed. For example, help received (from colleagues or supervisors) was a significant predictor in the first week of the internship but not in the last; the opposite was the case for autonomy. From these results, we derive implications for both future research and the active design of internships in the higher education context.</p>","PeriodicalId":46260,"journal":{"name":"Vocations and Learning","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vocations and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-024-09349-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Internships offer the opportunity to gain experience and skills by working in organisations or to establish a professional network, and there is empirical evidence of the positive effects of practical experience in higher education. However, there are only a few studies on the characteristics of workplace tasks that facilitate learning during internships. In this paper, we address this research gap by conducting a diary study to examine students' work tasks at the beginning and end of an eight-week business internship period, their perceptions of the tasks, and the influence of task characteristics on self-perceived learning. Analyses of approximately 2,000 work tasks documented by 51 students show that the frequencies of different work tasks did not differ substantially between the first and last week of the business internship. At both times of data collection, many students were engaged in organisational routine and administrative tasks, especially those with a domain-specific focus. However, the values for the assessment of task characteristics (such as challenge/difficulty) were higher at the beginning of the internship than towards the end. Causal analyses revealed that task characteristics such as novelty or feedback (from colleagues or supervisors) were positive predictors of self-perceived learning during both weeks, whereas the predictive power of other task features changed. For example, help received (from colleagues or supervisors) was a significant predictor in the first week of the internship but not in the last; the opposite was the case for autonomy. From these results, we derive implications for both future research and the active design of internships in the higher education context.
期刊介绍:
Vocations and Learning: Studies in Vocational and Professional Education is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for strongly conceptual and carefully prepared manuscripts that inform the broad field of vocational learning. The scope of the journal and its focus on vocational learning is inclusive of vocational and professional learning albeit through the very diverse range of settings (e.g. vocational colleges, schools, universities, workplaces, domestic environments, voluntary bodies etc) in which it occurs. It stands to be the only truly international journal that focuses on vocational learning, as encompassing the activities that comprise vocational education and professional education in their diverse forms internationally. Vocations and Learning aims to: enhance the contribution of research and scholarship to vocational and professional education policy; support the development of conceptualisation(s) of vocational and professional learning and education; improve the quality of practice within vocational and professional learning and education; and enhance and support the standing of these fields as a sectors with its own significant purposes, pedagogies and curriculums. Vocations and Learning: Studies in Vocational and Professional Education encourages the submission of high-quality contributions from a broad range of disciplines, as well as those that cross disciplinary boundaries, in addressing issues associated with vocational and professional education. It is intended that contributions will represent those from major disciplines (i.e. psychology, philosophy, sociology, anthropology, history, cultural studies, labour studies, industrial relations and economics) as cross overs within and hybrids with and amongst these disciplinary traditions. These contributions can comprise papers that provide either empirically-based accounts, discussions of theoretical perspectives or reviews of literature about vocational learning. In addition, books, reports and policies associated with vocational learning will also be reviewed. Topics addressed through contributions within the proposed journal might include, but will not be restricted to: curriculum and pedagogy practices for vocational learning the role and nature of knowledge in vocational learning the nature of vocations, professional practice and learning the relationship between context and learning in vocational settings the nature and role of vocational education the nature of goals for vocational learning different manifestations and comparative analyses of vocational education, their purposes and formation organisational pedagogics transformations in vocational learning and education over time and space analyses of instructional practice within vocational learning and education analyses of vocational learning and education policies international comparisons of vocational learning and education critical appraisal of contemporary policies, practices and initiatives studies of teaching and learning in vocational education approaches to vocational learning in non-work settings and in unpaid work learning throughout working lives relationships between vocational learning and economic imperatives and conceptions and national and trans-national agencies and their policies.