Relationship between Receipt of the Samples of Breast Milk Substitutes in Hospitals and Breastfeeding Practice in Japan.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2024-06-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/whr.2024.0042
Kaho Hisamatsu, Keiko Nanishi, Midori Matsushima, Sumiyo Okawa, Takahiro Tabuchi
{"title":"Relationship between Receipt of the Samples of Breast Milk Substitutes in Hospitals and Breastfeeding Practice in Japan.","authors":"Kaho Hisamatsu, Keiko Nanishi, Midori Matsushima, Sumiyo Okawa, Takahiro Tabuchi","doi":"10.1089/whr.2024.0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study estimated the percentage of mothers who received samples of breast milk substitutes at medical facilities and examined the relationship between receipt of the samples and breastfeeding practices in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the data from the \"The Japan COVID-19 and Society Internet Survey (JACSIS)\" conducted in 2021. Two groups of mothers were analyzed: mothers 0-5 months postpartum (<i>n</i> = 1,412) and mothers 5-12 months postpartum (<i>n</i> = 2,045). Logistic regression analysis was conducted with the practice of exclusive breastfeeding as the dependent variable and the receipt of the sample as the explanatory variable. Exclusive breastfeeding was defined in different ways for each group: \"exclusive breastfeeding under five months\" as measured by 24-hour recall for mothers 0-5 months postpartum, and \"exclusive breastfeeding for the first five months\" as defined by asking mothers 5-12 months postpartum when they first fed infant formula or baby food and when they finished breastfeeding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proportion of mothers who received the samples was 82.4%. We found that mothers who received the samples were found to be less likely to continue \"exclusive breastfeeding under five months\" (odds ratio: 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.98). In addition, a similar trend was found in a subsample analysis restricted to mothers who intended to breastfeed during pregnancy (odds ratio: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.40-0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed that more than 80% of mothers had received the samples of breast milk substitutes, and that receipt of the samples decreased the probability of their practicing exclusive breastfeeding. Regulating distribution of the samples at medical facilities is necessary to prevent interruptions of exclusive breastfeeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"5 1","pages":"503-511"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2024.0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study estimated the percentage of mothers who received samples of breast milk substitutes at medical facilities and examined the relationship between receipt of the samples and breastfeeding practices in Japan.

Methods: We used the data from the "The Japan COVID-19 and Society Internet Survey (JACSIS)" conducted in 2021. Two groups of mothers were analyzed: mothers 0-5 months postpartum (n = 1,412) and mothers 5-12 months postpartum (n = 2,045). Logistic regression analysis was conducted with the practice of exclusive breastfeeding as the dependent variable and the receipt of the sample as the explanatory variable. Exclusive breastfeeding was defined in different ways for each group: "exclusive breastfeeding under five months" as measured by 24-hour recall for mothers 0-5 months postpartum, and "exclusive breastfeeding for the first five months" as defined by asking mothers 5-12 months postpartum when they first fed infant formula or baby food and when they finished breastfeeding.

Results: The proportion of mothers who received the samples was 82.4%. We found that mothers who received the samples were found to be less likely to continue "exclusive breastfeeding under five months" (odds ratio: 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.98). In addition, a similar trend was found in a subsample analysis restricted to mothers who intended to breastfeed during pregnancy (odds ratio: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.40-0.94).

Conclusions: This study showed that more than 80% of mothers had received the samples of breast milk substitutes, and that receipt of the samples decreased the probability of their practicing exclusive breastfeeding. Regulating distribution of the samples at medical facilities is necessary to prevent interruptions of exclusive breastfeeding.

日本医院接收母乳代用品样本与母乳喂养实践之间的关系。
研究目的本研究估算了日本在医疗机构领取母乳代用品样本的母亲比例,并探讨了领取样本与母乳喂养实践之间的关系:我们使用了 2021 年进行的 "日本 COVID-19 和社会互联网调查(JACSIS)"的数据。我们对两组母亲进行了分析:产后 0-5 个月的母亲(人数=1,412)和产后 5-12 个月的母亲(人数=2,045)。以纯母乳喂养作为因变量,以样本接收情况作为解释变量,进行了逻辑回归分析。各组对纯母乳喂养的定义不同:产后 0-5 个月的母亲通过 24 小时回忆来衡量 "5 个月以下纯母乳喂养",而 "前 5 个月纯母乳喂养 "则是通过询问产后 5-12 个月的母亲何时首次喂食婴儿配方奶粉或婴儿食品以及何时结束母乳喂养来定义的:接受样本的母亲比例为 82.4%。我们发现,接受样本的母亲继续 "5 个月以下纯母乳喂养 "的可能性较低(几率比:0.71,95% 置信区间[CI]:0.51-0.98)。此外,在仅限于怀孕期间打算母乳喂养的母亲的子样本分析中也发现了类似的趋势(几率比:0.62,95% 置信区间:0.40-0.94):这项研究表明,超过 80% 的母亲收到过母乳替代品样本,而收到样本会降低她们进行纯母乳喂养的概率。为防止纯母乳喂养中断,有必要规范医疗机构的样本发放工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信