Exploring suitability to electrical storm ablation in patients in waiting list for heart transplantation: A single center experience.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1111/pace.15036
Lorenzo Gigli, Alberto Preda, Marisa Varrenti, Matteo Baroni, Sara Vargiu, Fabrizio Guarracini, Enrico Ammirati, Patrizio Mazzone
{"title":"Exploring suitability to electrical storm ablation in patients in waiting list for heart transplantation: A single center experience.","authors":"Lorenzo Gigli, Alberto Preda, Marisa Varrenti, Matteo Baroni, Sara Vargiu, Fabrizio Guarracini, Enrico Ammirati, Patrizio Mazzone","doi":"10.1111/pace.15036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Electrical storm (ES) is among the most fearsome events in patients in waiting list for heart transplantation (HT) and catheter ablation (CA) demonstrated to be effective in reduce the arrhythmic burden. However, selection criteria for CA suitability in this specific population have never been addressed before. We retrospectively enrolled 36 patients (mean age 51 ± 8 years; 83% men) waiting HT referred to our department for ES resistant to antiarrhythmic drugs and percutaneous stellate ganglion blockade. Twenty patients were judged suitable for VT ablation according to specific criteria including absence of increased arrhythmic burden secondary to volume overload and hemodynamic decompensation; expected CA outcome favorable due to etiology of the cardiomyopathy, no need for coronary revascularization and technical feasibility of the procedure. The pre-emptive use of mechanical circulatory supports (MCS) were discussed integrating the PAINESD score with additional clinical and hemodynamic parameters. Acute procedural success was accounted in 85% of cases with only two major complications. The CA group reported lower length of in-hospital stay after CA suitability evaluation (56 ± 17 vs. 131 ± 64 days, p = .004). Furthermore, at a mean follow-up of 703 ± 145 days, this group showed reduction of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) recurrence leading to implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock (4 vs. 8, p = .051) and underwent HT with a lower level of urgency (0 vs. 6 patients needed for UNOS1 status upgrade). Respectively, one patient of the CA group and two patients of the conservative group died (p = .839). At the end of follow-up, eight patients underwent heart transplantation (p = .964) while four patients underwent Left Ventricular Assist device (LVAD) implantation (p = .440). This pilot study should be a proof for further studies exploring CA of VAs as a possible bridge therapy to HT.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Electrical storm (ES) is among the most fearsome events in patients in waiting list for heart transplantation (HT) and catheter ablation (CA) demonstrated to be effective in reduce the arrhythmic burden. However, selection criteria for CA suitability in this specific population have never been addressed before. We retrospectively enrolled 36 patients (mean age 51 ± 8 years; 83% men) waiting HT referred to our department for ES resistant to antiarrhythmic drugs and percutaneous stellate ganglion blockade. Twenty patients were judged suitable for VT ablation according to specific criteria including absence of increased arrhythmic burden secondary to volume overload and hemodynamic decompensation; expected CA outcome favorable due to etiology of the cardiomyopathy, no need for coronary revascularization and technical feasibility of the procedure. The pre-emptive use of mechanical circulatory supports (MCS) were discussed integrating the PAINESD score with additional clinical and hemodynamic parameters. Acute procedural success was accounted in 85% of cases with only two major complications. The CA group reported lower length of in-hospital stay after CA suitability evaluation (56 ± 17 vs. 131 ± 64 days, p = .004). Furthermore, at a mean follow-up of 703 ± 145 days, this group showed reduction of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) recurrence leading to implantable cardioverter defibrillator shock (4 vs. 8, p = .051) and underwent HT with a lower level of urgency (0 vs. 6 patients needed for UNOS1 status upgrade). Respectively, one patient of the CA group and two patients of the conservative group died (p = .839). At the end of follow-up, eight patients underwent heart transplantation (p = .964) while four patients underwent Left Ventricular Assist device (LVAD) implantation (p = .440). This pilot study should be a proof for further studies exploring CA of VAs as a possible bridge therapy to HT.

探索心脏移植候选患者是否适合接受电风暴消融术:单中心经验。
电风暴(ES)是心脏移植(HT)候选患者中最可怕的事件之一,导管消融(CA)被证明能有效减轻心律失常的负担。然而,这一特殊人群是否适合接受导管消融术的选择标准以前从未涉及过。我们回顾性地纳入了因抗心律失常药物和经皮星状神经节阻滞治疗耐药而转诊到我科等待 HT 的 36 名患者(平均年龄 51 ± 8 岁;83% 为男性)。根据特定标准(包括没有因容量超负荷和血流动力学失代偿而导致的心律失常负担加重;因心肌病病因导致的预期 CA 结果良好;无需进行冠状动脉血运重建以及手术的技术可行性),有 20 名患者被判定适合进行 VT 消融术。结合 PAINESD 评分以及其他临床和血流动力学参数,讨论了机械循环支持(MCS)的先期使用。85%的病例取得了急性手术成功,仅出现了两种主要并发症。CA 组在 CA 适用性评估后的住院时间较短(56 ± 17 天 vs. 131 ± 64 天,p = .004)。此外,在平均 703 ± 145 天的随访中,该组患者导致植入式心律转复除颤器电击的室性心律失常(VA)复发率降低(4 对 8,p = .051),接受 HT 的紧急程度降低(0 对 6 名患者需要升级 UNOS1 状态)。CA 组和保守组分别有 1 名和 2 名患者死亡(p = .839)。随访结束时,8 名患者接受了心脏移植手术(p = .964),4 名患者接受了左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入手术(p = .440)。这项试验性研究应作为进一步研究的佐证,探索将 VAs 的 CA 作为通往 HT 的可能桥梁疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
209
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (PACE) is the foremost peer-reviewed journal in the field of pacing and implantable cardioversion defibrillation, publishing over 50% of all English language articles in its field, featuring original, review, and didactic papers, and case reports related to daily practice. Articles also include editorials, book reviews, Musings on humane topics relevant to medical practice, electrophysiology (EP) rounds, device rounds, and information concerning the quality of devices used in the practice of the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信