Investigating the Efficacy of a Handheld Fan Intervention in Children With Dyspnea: A Randomized Controlled Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Journal of Emergency Nursing Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jen.2024.06.009
Özge Eda Karadağ Aytemiz, Sermin Dinç, Duygu Gözen, Gökçe Çiçek
{"title":"Investigating the Efficacy of a Handheld Fan Intervention in Children With Dyspnea: A Randomized Controlled Study.","authors":"Özge Eda Karadağ Aytemiz, Sermin Dinç, Duygu Gözen, Gökçe Çiçek","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.06.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dyspnea associated with acute respiratory tract infections is a common cause of emergency admissions and can be distressing for children. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a handheld fan intervention on physiological parameters in pediatric patients with dyspnea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 59 children aged 2 to 12 years presenting to an emergency department for upper respiratory tract infection between March 2022 and March 2023 were assigned to the experimental group (n = 32) or control group (n = 27) by urn randomization. Both groups received the hospital's standard care, including 3 doses of inhaled bronchodilator at 20-minute intervals. The fan intervention consisted of parents applying a handheld electric fan to the child's face at a distance of 15 cm for 5 minutes after each inhaler treatment. Oxygen saturation, heart rate, and respiratory rate were recorded before treatment and after the 3 inhaler treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistical differences in descriptive characteristics between the experimental and control groups (P > .05). Oxygen saturation values were significantly higher in the control group before treatment but showed greater increases in the intervention group after treatment (P < .001). The intervention group also exhibited greater reductions than the control group in both heart rate and respiratory rate after the third treatment than pretreatment values (P < .05).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The handheld fan intervention effectively supports inhaler treatment for children with dyspnea. Further studies are recommended to assess its impact across different age groups and clinical conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.06.009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Dyspnea associated with acute respiratory tract infections is a common cause of emergency admissions and can be distressing for children. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a handheld fan intervention on physiological parameters in pediatric patients with dyspnea.

Methods: A total of 59 children aged 2 to 12 years presenting to an emergency department for upper respiratory tract infection between March 2022 and March 2023 were assigned to the experimental group (n = 32) or control group (n = 27) by urn randomization. Both groups received the hospital's standard care, including 3 doses of inhaled bronchodilator at 20-minute intervals. The fan intervention consisted of parents applying a handheld electric fan to the child's face at a distance of 15 cm for 5 minutes after each inhaler treatment. Oxygen saturation, heart rate, and respiratory rate were recorded before treatment and after the 3 inhaler treatments.

Results: There were no statistical differences in descriptive characteristics between the experimental and control groups (P > .05). Oxygen saturation values were significantly higher in the control group before treatment but showed greater increases in the intervention group after treatment (P < .001). The intervention group also exhibited greater reductions than the control group in both heart rate and respiratory rate after the third treatment than pretreatment values (P < .05).

Discussion: The handheld fan intervention effectively supports inhaler treatment for children with dyspnea. Further studies are recommended to assess its impact across different age groups and clinical conditions.

调查手持风扇对呼吸困难儿童的干预效果:随机对照研究
前言与急性呼吸道感染相关的呼吸困难是急诊入院的常见原因,可能会让儿童感到痛苦。本研究旨在评估手持风扇干预对呼吸困难儿科患者生理参数的影响:在2022年3月至2023年3月期间,共有59名2至12岁的儿童因上呼吸道感染到急诊科就诊,通过瓮式随机分配法将他们分配到实验组(32人)或对照组(27人)。两组均接受医院的标准护理,包括每隔 20 分钟使用 3 次吸入式支气管扩张剂。电风扇干预包括在每次吸入治疗后,家长在距离患儿脸部 15 厘米处用手持电风扇吹 5 分钟。在治疗前和 3 次吸入器治疗后记录血氧饱和度、心率和呼吸频率:实验组和对照组在描述性特征方面没有统计学差异(P > .05)。对照组在治疗前的血氧饱和度值明显更高,但干预组在治疗后的血氧饱和度值上升幅度更大(P < .001)。与对照组相比,干预组在第三次治疗后的心率和呼吸频率也比治疗前的值降低得更多(P 讨论):手持风扇干预能有效支持呼吸困难儿童的吸入器治疗。建议进一步开展研究,以评估其对不同年龄组和临床状况的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信