Single-shot interscalene block with liposomal bupivacaine vs. non-liposomal bupivacaine in shoulder arthroplasty.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Samuel Lorentz, Jay M Levin, Eric Warren, Eoghan T Hurley, Frederic B Mills, Bryan S Crook, Emily Poehlein, Cynthia L Green, W Michael Bullock, Jeff C Gadsden, Christopher S Klifto, Oke Anakwenze
{"title":"Single-shot interscalene block with liposomal bupivacaine vs. non-liposomal bupivacaine in shoulder arthroplasty.","authors":"Samuel Lorentz, Jay M Levin, Eric Warren, Eoghan T Hurley, Frederic B Mills, Bryan S Crook, Emily Poehlein, Cynthia L Green, W Michael Bullock, Jeff C Gadsden, Christopher S Klifto, Oke Anakwenze","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Regional anesthesia is a valuable component of multimodal pain control in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and multiple interscalene block anesthetic options exist, including nonliposomal interscalene bupivacaine (NLIB) and liposomal interscalene bupivacaine (LIB). The purpose of this study was to compare pain control and opioid consumption within 48 hours postoperation in those undergoing TSA with either LIB or NLIB.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study at a single academic medical center including consecutive patients undergoing inpatient (>23-hour hospitalization) primary anatomic or reverse TSA from 2016 to 2020 who received either LIB or an NLIB for perioperative pain control. Perioperative patient outcomes were collected including pain levels and opioid usage, as well as 30- and 90-day emergency department (ED) visits or readmissions. The primary outcome was postoperative pain and opioid use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 489 patients were included in this study (316 LIB and 173 NLIB). Pain scores at 3, 6, 12, and 48 hours postoperatively were not statistically significantly different (P > .05 for all). However, the LIB group had improved pain scores at 24 and 36 hours postoperation (P < .05 all). There was no difference in the incidence of severe postoperative pain, defined as a 9 or 10 numeric rating scale-11 score, between the 2 anesthesia groups after adjusting for preoperative pain and baseline opioid use (odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 0.57-2.74; P = .57). Overall, 99 of 316 patients receiving LIB (31.3%) did not require any postoperative opioids compared with 38 of 173 receiving NLIB (22.0%); however, this difference was not statistically significant after adjusting for prior opioid use and preoperative pain (P = .33). No statistically significant differences in postoperative total morphine equivalents or mean daily morphine equivalents consumed between the groups were found during their hospital stays (P > .05 for both). Finally, no significant differences were found in 30- and 90-day ED visits or readmission rates (all P > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LIB and NLIB demonstrated differences in patient-reported pain scores at 24 and 36 hours postoperation, although these did not reach clinical significance. There were no statistically significant differences in opioid consumption during the hospital stay, including opioid use, total morphine equivalents, and daily mean morphine equivalents consumed during the hospital stay. Additionally, no differences were observed in 30- and 90-day ED visits or readmission rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.046","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Regional anesthesia is a valuable component of multimodal pain control in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and multiple interscalene block anesthetic options exist, including nonliposomal interscalene bupivacaine (NLIB) and liposomal interscalene bupivacaine (LIB). The purpose of this study was to compare pain control and opioid consumption within 48 hours postoperation in those undergoing TSA with either LIB or NLIB.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study at a single academic medical center including consecutive patients undergoing inpatient (>23-hour hospitalization) primary anatomic or reverse TSA from 2016 to 2020 who received either LIB or an NLIB for perioperative pain control. Perioperative patient outcomes were collected including pain levels and opioid usage, as well as 30- and 90-day emergency department (ED) visits or readmissions. The primary outcome was postoperative pain and opioid use.

Results: Overall, 489 patients were included in this study (316 LIB and 173 NLIB). Pain scores at 3, 6, 12, and 48 hours postoperatively were not statistically significantly different (P > .05 for all). However, the LIB group had improved pain scores at 24 and 36 hours postoperation (P < .05 all). There was no difference in the incidence of severe postoperative pain, defined as a 9 or 10 numeric rating scale-11 score, between the 2 anesthesia groups after adjusting for preoperative pain and baseline opioid use (odds ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 0.57-2.74; P = .57). Overall, 99 of 316 patients receiving LIB (31.3%) did not require any postoperative opioids compared with 38 of 173 receiving NLIB (22.0%); however, this difference was not statistically significant after adjusting for prior opioid use and preoperative pain (P = .33). No statistically significant differences in postoperative total morphine equivalents or mean daily morphine equivalents consumed between the groups were found during their hospital stays (P > .05 for both). Finally, no significant differences were found in 30- and 90-day ED visits or readmission rates (all P > .05).

Conclusion: LIB and NLIB demonstrated differences in patient-reported pain scores at 24 and 36 hours postoperation, although these did not reach clinical significance. There were no statistically significant differences in opioid consumption during the hospital stay, including opioid use, total morphine equivalents, and daily mean morphine equivalents consumed during the hospital stay. Additionally, no differences were observed in 30- and 90-day ED visits or readmission rates.

肩关节置换术中使用脂质体布比卡因与非脂质体布比卡因的单次椎间阻滞术
背景:区域麻醉是全肩关节置换术(TSA)中多模式疼痛控制的重要组成部分,目前有多种椎间孔阻滞麻醉选择,包括非脂质体椎间孔布比卡因(NLIB)和脂质体椎间孔布比卡因(LIB)。本研究的目的是比较使用 LIB 或 NLIB 进行 TSA 手术的患者在术后 48 小时内的疼痛控制和阿片类药物消耗情况:这是一项在单个学术医疗中心进行的回顾性队列研究,包括2016年至2020年期间接受住院(住院时间超过23小时)原发性解剖或反向TSA的连续患者,这些患者接受了LIB或NLIB进行围手术期疼痛控制。收集的围手术期患者结果包括疼痛程度和阿片类药物使用情况,以及30天和90天的急诊室就诊或再入院情况。主要结果是术后疼痛和阿片类药物的使用:本研究共纳入了 489 名患者(316 名 LIB 患者和 173 名 NLIB 患者)。术后 3、6、12 和 48 小时的疼痛评分在统计学上无显著差异(P>0.05)。不过,LIB 组在术后 24 小时和 36 小时的疼痛评分有所改善(均为 P0.05)。最后,在30天和90天的急诊就诊率或再入院率方面没有发现明显差异(均为P>0.05):结论:LIB和NLIB在患者术后24小时和36小时的疼痛评分方面存在差异,但未达到临床意义。住院期间阿片类药物的消耗量,包括阿片类药物的使用量、总吗啡当量和住院期间每日平均吗啡当量的消耗量,均无统计学意义上的差异。此外,在 30 天和 90 天的急诊室就诊率或再入院率方面也未观察到差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信