Current Procedural Terminology Code Selection, Attitudes, and Practices of the Orthopaedic Surgery Resident Case Log: A Survey of Residents and Program Directors.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2024-07-19 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00176
Matthew Dulas, Thomas J Utset-Ward, Jason A Strelzow, Tessa Balach
{"title":"Current Procedural Terminology Code Selection, Attitudes, and Practices of the Orthopaedic Surgery Resident Case Log: A Survey of Residents and Program Directors.","authors":"Matthew Dulas, Thomas J Utset-Ward, Jason A Strelzow, Tessa Balach","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Resident Case Log is one of the primary tools used to track surgical experience. Owing to the self-reported nature of case logging, there is uncertainty in the consistency and accuracy of case logging. The aims of this study are two-fold: to assess current resident case log Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code selection and practices across orthopaedic surgery residencies and to understand current attitudes of both program directors (PD) and residents surrounding case logging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Residents and PDs from 18 residency programs received standardized, consensus-built surveys distributed through the Collaborative Orthopaedic Educational Research Group. Resident surveys additionally contained clinical orthopaedic subspecialties vignettes on sports, trauma, and spine. Each subspecialty section contained 4 clinical vignettes with stepwise increases in complexity/CPT coding procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred sixteen residents (response rate: 28.4%) and 16 PDs (response rate: 88.9%) participated. Formal case log training was reported by 53.0% of residents and 56.3% of PDs. A total of 7.8% of residents rated themselves \"excellent\" at applying CPT codes for the case log, while 0.0% PDs rated their residents' ability as \"excellent.\" In total, 40.9% of residents and 81.3% of PDs responded that it was \"extremely important\" or \"very important\" to code accurately (p = 0.006). Agreement between resident CPT code selection and number of cases and procedures logged for each clinical vignette was conducted using Fleiss' kappa. As the clinical vignettes increased in complexity, there was a decreasing trend in kappa values from the first (least complex) to the last (most complex) clinical vignette.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The inconsistent case logging practices, dubious outlook on case log accuracy and resident case logging ability and attitude, and lack of formal training signals a need for formal, standardized case log training. Enhanced case logging instruction and formalized educational training for PDs and residents would be a meaningful step toward capturing true operative experience, which would have a substantial impact on orthopaedic surgery resident education and assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"9 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.23.00176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Resident Case Log is one of the primary tools used to track surgical experience. Owing to the self-reported nature of case logging, there is uncertainty in the consistency and accuracy of case logging. The aims of this study are two-fold: to assess current resident case log Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code selection and practices across orthopaedic surgery residencies and to understand current attitudes of both program directors (PD) and residents surrounding case logging.

Methods: Residents and PDs from 18 residency programs received standardized, consensus-built surveys distributed through the Collaborative Orthopaedic Educational Research Group. Resident surveys additionally contained clinical orthopaedic subspecialties vignettes on sports, trauma, and spine. Each subspecialty section contained 4 clinical vignettes with stepwise increases in complexity/CPT coding procedures.

Results: One hundred sixteen residents (response rate: 28.4%) and 16 PDs (response rate: 88.9%) participated. Formal case log training was reported by 53.0% of residents and 56.3% of PDs. A total of 7.8% of residents rated themselves "excellent" at applying CPT codes for the case log, while 0.0% PDs rated their residents' ability as "excellent." In total, 40.9% of residents and 81.3% of PDs responded that it was "extremely important" or "very important" to code accurately (p = 0.006). Agreement between resident CPT code selection and number of cases and procedures logged for each clinical vignette was conducted using Fleiss' kappa. As the clinical vignettes increased in complexity, there was a decreasing trend in kappa values from the first (least complex) to the last (most complex) clinical vignette.

Conclusions: The inconsistent case logging practices, dubious outlook on case log accuracy and resident case logging ability and attitude, and lack of formal training signals a need for formal, standardized case log training. Enhanced case logging instruction and formalized educational training for PDs and residents would be a meaningful step toward capturing true operative experience, which would have a substantial impact on orthopaedic surgery resident education and assessment.

骨科住院医师病例日志的当前程序术语代码选择、态度和做法:对住院医师和项目主任的调查。
简介:毕业后医学教育认证委员会的住院医师病例日志是用于跟踪手术经验的主要工具之一。由于病例记录的自我报告性质,病例记录的一致性和准确性存在不确定性。本研究有两个目的:评估骨科住院医师病例记录的当前程序术语(CPT)代码选择和实践,了解项目主任(PD)和住院医师目前对病例记录的态度:来自 18 个住院医师培训项目的住院医师和项目主任收到了通过骨科教育研究协作组分发的标准化共识调查问卷。住院医师调查表还包含运动、创伤和脊柱等临床骨科亚专科小节。每个亚专科部分包含 4 个临床小故事,其复杂程度/CPT 编码程序逐步增加:结果:116 名住院医师(回复率:28.4%)和 16 名主治医师(回复率:88.9%)参加了培训。53.0%的住院医师和 56.3%的主治医师接受了正式的病例记录培训。共有 7.8% 的住院医师将自己在病例日志中应用 CPT 代码的能力评为 "优秀",而 0.0% 的主治医师将其住院医师的能力评为 "优秀"。共有 40.9% 的住院医师和 81.3% 的主治医师认为准确编码 "极其重要 "或 "非常重要"(p = 0.006)。使用 Fleiss' kappa 分析了住院医师 CPT 代码选择与每个临床小节记录的病例数和程序数之间的一致性。随着临床小节复杂程度的增加,从第一个(最不复杂)到最后一个(最复杂)临床小节的 kappa 值呈下降趋势:不一致的病例记录实践、对病例记录准确性和住院医师病例记录能力与态度的怀疑以及缺乏正规培训,都表明需要进行正规、标准化的病例记录培训。加强住院医师和住院医师的病例记录指导和正规化教育培训将是获取真实手术经验的重要一步,这将对骨科住院医师的教育和评估产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信