Optimization of long-term incubation of precision-cut kidney slices.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q1 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
C Hoeffner, F Worek, G Horn, N Amend
{"title":"Optimization of long-term incubation of precision-cut kidney slices.","authors":"C Hoeffner, F Worek, G Horn, N Amend","doi":"10.1080/15376516.2024.2382797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Precision-cut kidney slices (PCKS) provide a powerful model to close the gap between <i>in vivo</i> and <i>in vitro</i> research. Publications by various authors favor different incubation conditions, media, and antibiotics, that have not yet been compared in a standardized manner. After preparation, rat-PCKS were incubated in a total of nine combinations of incubation media and antibiotics for four days. We found that a combination of DMEM/F-12 and gentamicin showed the highest levels of viability. Utilizing both qualitative and quantitative methods, we observed stable levels of cellular viability for 10 days when incubated in the most suitable medium combination of DMEM and gentamicin. Additionally, a calcein acetoxymethyl/ethidium homodimer-1 based live/dead staining, analysis of total protein content and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were explored to assess both short- and long-term tissue viability. PCKS showed a significant decrease in total protein content, leveling off at around 60% over the duration of 10 days. To be able to evaluate viability irrespective of decreases in total protein detected, we chose to utilize the alamarBlue Cell Viability Assay. Quantifying both intra- and extracellular activity of LDH, while using different concentrations of ethanol as a positive control, we explored enzyme content as a parameter for cell membrane damage and cytotoxicity in PCKS. Overall, we showed that PCKS are suitable for both short- and long-term observation by optimizing incubation parameters, with numerous possibilities for other assays and methods in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23177,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15376516.2024.2382797","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precision-cut kidney slices (PCKS) provide a powerful model to close the gap between in vivo and in vitro research. Publications by various authors favor different incubation conditions, media, and antibiotics, that have not yet been compared in a standardized manner. After preparation, rat-PCKS were incubated in a total of nine combinations of incubation media and antibiotics for four days. We found that a combination of DMEM/F-12 and gentamicin showed the highest levels of viability. Utilizing both qualitative and quantitative methods, we observed stable levels of cellular viability for 10 days when incubated in the most suitable medium combination of DMEM and gentamicin. Additionally, a calcein acetoxymethyl/ethidium homodimer-1 based live/dead staining, analysis of total protein content and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were explored to assess both short- and long-term tissue viability. PCKS showed a significant decrease in total protein content, leveling off at around 60% over the duration of 10 days. To be able to evaluate viability irrespective of decreases in total protein detected, we chose to utilize the alamarBlue Cell Viability Assay. Quantifying both intra- and extracellular activity of LDH, while using different concentrations of ethanol as a positive control, we explored enzyme content as a parameter for cell membrane damage and cytotoxicity in PCKS. Overall, we showed that PCKS are suitable for both short- and long-term observation by optimizing incubation parameters, with numerous possibilities for other assays and methods in future studies.

优化精密切割肾切片的长期培养。
精密切割肾切片(PCKS)为缩小体内和体外研究之间的差距提供了一个强大的模型。不同作者发表的文章倾向于使用不同的培养条件、培养基和抗生素,但尚未对这些条件进行标准化比较。制备大鼠 PCKS 后,将其在九种培养基和抗生素组合中培养 4 天。我们发现,DMEM/F-12 和庆大霉素的组合显示出最高的存活率。利用定性和定量方法,我们观察到在最合适的 DMEM 和庆大霉素培养基组合中培养十天后,细胞活力水平保持稳定。此外,我们还采用了基于钙素乙酰氧甲基/乙硫同源二聚体-1的活体/死体染色法、总蛋白含量和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)分析法来评估组织的短期和长期存活能力。PCKS 显示总蛋白含量明显下降,在 10 天的持续时间内下降到 60% 左右。为了能够在检测到总蛋白含量下降的情况下评估存活率,我们选择使用藻蓝蛋白细胞存活率测定法。在使用不同浓度的乙醇作为阳性对照的同时,我们对 LDH 在细胞内和细胞外的活性进行了量化,并将酶含量作为 PCKS 中细胞膜损伤和细胞毒性的参数进行了研究。总之,通过优化培养参数,我们发现 PCKS 既适合短期观察,也适合长期观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
66
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods is a peer-reviewed journal whose aim is twofold. Firstly, the journal contains original research on subjects dealing with the mechanisms by which foreign chemicals cause toxic tissue injury. Chemical substances of interest include industrial compounds, environmental pollutants, hazardous wastes, drugs, pesticides, and chemical warfare agents. The scope of the journal spans from molecular and cellular mechanisms of action to the consideration of mechanistic evidence in establishing regulatory policy. Secondly, the journal addresses aspects of the development, validation, and application of new and existing laboratory methods, techniques, and equipment. A variety of research methods are discussed, including: In vivo studies with standard and alternative species In vitro studies and alternative methodologies Molecular, biochemical, and cellular techniques Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics Mathematical modeling and computer programs Forensic analyses Risk assessment Data collection and analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信