ICURE: Intensive care unit (ICU) risk evaluation for 30-day mortality. Developing and evaluating a multivariable machine learning prediction model for patients admitted to the general ICU in Sweden.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-21 DOI:10.1111/aas.14501
Tobias Siöland, Araz Rawshani, Bengt Nellgård, Johan Malmgren, Jonatan Oras, Keti Dalla, Giovanni Cinà, Lars Engerström, Fredrik Hessulf
{"title":"ICURE: Intensive care unit (ICU) risk evaluation for 30-day mortality. Developing and evaluating a multivariable machine learning prediction model for patients admitted to the general ICU in Sweden.","authors":"Tobias Siöland, Araz Rawshani, Bengt Nellgård, Johan Malmgren, Jonatan Oras, Keti Dalla, Giovanni Cinà, Lars Engerström, Fredrik Hessulf","doi":"10.1111/aas.14501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A prediction model that estimates mortality at admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) is of potential benefit to both patients and society. Logistic regression models like Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3) and APACHE are the traditional ICU mortality prediction models. With the emergence of machine learning (machine learning) and artificial intelligence, new possibilities arise to create prediction models that have the potential to sharpen predictive accuracy and reduce the likelihood of misclassification in the prediction of 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Swedish Intensive Care Registry (SIR) to identify and include all patients ≥18 years of age admitted to general ICUs in Sweden from 2008 to 2022 with SAPS 3 score registered. Only data collected within 1 h of ICU admission was used. We had 153 candidate predictors including baseline characteristics, previous medical conditions, blood works, physiological parameters, cause of admission, and initial treatment. We stratified the data randomly on the outcome variable 30-day mortality and created a training set (80% of data) and a test set (20% of data). We evaluated several hundred prediction models using multiple ML frameworks including random forest, gradient boosting, neural networks, and logistic regression models. Model performance was evaluated by comparing the receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (AUC-ROC). The best performing model was fine-tuned by optimizing hyperparameters. The model's calibration was evaluated by a calibration belt. Ultimately, we simplified the best performing model with the top 1-20 predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 296,344 first-time ICU admissions. We found age, Glasgow Coma Scale, creatinine, systolic blood pressure, and pH being the most important predictors. The AUC-ROC was 0.884 in test data using all predictors, specificity 95.2%, sensitivity 47.0%, negative predictive value of 87.9% and positive predictive value of 70.7%. The final model showed excellent calibration. The ICU risk evaluation for 30-day mortality (ICURE) prediction model performed equally well to the SAPS 3 score with only eight variables and improved further with the addition of more variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ICURE prediction model predicts 30-day mortality rate at first-time ICU admission superiorly compared to the established SAPS 3 score.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":"1379-1389"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14501","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A prediction model that estimates mortality at admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) is of potential benefit to both patients and society. Logistic regression models like Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3) and APACHE are the traditional ICU mortality prediction models. With the emergence of machine learning (machine learning) and artificial intelligence, new possibilities arise to create prediction models that have the potential to sharpen predictive accuracy and reduce the likelihood of misclassification in the prediction of 30-day mortality.

Methods: We used the Swedish Intensive Care Registry (SIR) to identify and include all patients ≥18 years of age admitted to general ICUs in Sweden from 2008 to 2022 with SAPS 3 score registered. Only data collected within 1 h of ICU admission was used. We had 153 candidate predictors including baseline characteristics, previous medical conditions, blood works, physiological parameters, cause of admission, and initial treatment. We stratified the data randomly on the outcome variable 30-day mortality and created a training set (80% of data) and a test set (20% of data). We evaluated several hundred prediction models using multiple ML frameworks including random forest, gradient boosting, neural networks, and logistic regression models. Model performance was evaluated by comparing the receiver operator characteristic area under the curve (AUC-ROC). The best performing model was fine-tuned by optimizing hyperparameters. The model's calibration was evaluated by a calibration belt. Ultimately, we simplified the best performing model with the top 1-20 predictors.

Results: We included 296,344 first-time ICU admissions. We found age, Glasgow Coma Scale, creatinine, systolic blood pressure, and pH being the most important predictors. The AUC-ROC was 0.884 in test data using all predictors, specificity 95.2%, sensitivity 47.0%, negative predictive value of 87.9% and positive predictive value of 70.7%. The final model showed excellent calibration. The ICU risk evaluation for 30-day mortality (ICURE) prediction model performed equally well to the SAPS 3 score with only eight variables and improved further with the addition of more variables.

Conclusion: The ICURE prediction model predicts 30-day mortality rate at first-time ICU admission superiorly compared to the established SAPS 3 score.

ICURE:重症监护室(ICU)30 天死亡率风险评估。为瑞典普通重症监护病房的住院患者开发和评估多变量机器学习预测模型。
背景:能估计重症监护病房(ICU)入院时死亡率的预测模型对患者和社会都有潜在的益处。简化急性生理学评分 3 (SAPS 3) 和 APACHE 等逻辑回归模型是传统的 ICU 死亡率预测模型。随着机器学习(machine learning)和人工智能的出现,创建预测模型的新可能性应运而生,这些模型有可能在预测 30 天死亡率时提高预测准确性并减少误分类的可能性:我们使用瑞典重症监护注册表(SIR)识别并纳入了 2008 年至 2022 年期间瑞典普通重症监护病房收治的所有年龄≥18 岁并登记有 SAPS 3 评分的患者。我们仅使用了 ICU 入院 1 小时内收集的数据。我们有 153 个候选预测因子,包括基线特征、既往病史、血液检查、生理参数、入院原因和初始治疗。我们根据结果变量 30 天死亡率对数据进行了随机分层,并创建了一个训练集(占数据的 80%)和一个测试集(占数据的 20%)。我们使用多种 ML 框架(包括随机森林、梯度提升、神经网络和逻辑回归模型)对数百个预测模型进行了评估。模型性能通过比较曲线下接收器运算特性面积(AUC-ROC)进行评估。通过优化超参数对表现最佳的模型进行微调。模型的校准通过校准带进行评估。最终,我们用前 1-20 个预测因子简化了表现最佳的模型:我们纳入了 296,344 例首次入住 ICU 的患者。我们发现年龄、格拉斯哥昏迷量表、肌酐、收缩压和 pH 值是最重要的预测因素。在使用所有预测因子的测试数据中,AUC-ROC 为 0.884,特异性为 95.2%,灵敏度为 47.0%,阴性预测值为 87.9%,阳性预测值为 70.7%。最终模型显示出极佳的校准效果。ICU 30 天死亡率风险评估(ICURE)预测模型在仅有 8 个变量的情况下与 SAPS 3 评分表现相当,在增加更多变量后进一步提高了预测结果:ICURE预测模型对首次入住ICU的患者30天死亡率的预测优于SAPS 3评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信