Census tract geospatial analysis comparing social determinants of health with tooth loss in California seniors: An ecologic study.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Gabriel Tse Feng Chong, Stuart A Gansky
{"title":"Census tract geospatial analysis comparing social determinants of health with tooth loss in California seniors: An ecologic study.","authors":"Gabriel Tse Feng Chong, Stuart A Gansky","doi":"10.1111/cdoe.12995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Individual-level social determinant of health (SDOH) measures alone may insufficiently explain disparities in edentulism among seniors. Therefore, the authors examined the correlation of census tract-level SDOH and residential racial segregation measures with edentulism in Californian adults aged ≥65 years old.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Explanatory variables were obtained from Healthy Places Index (HPI), the National Cancer Institute and diversitydatakids.org. The edentulism outcome variable was obtained from CDC's PLACES small area estimates from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. Pearson and Spearman rank correlations were estimated. Multiple linear regression and multi-collinearity evaluations were performed. The Global Moran's I statistic assessed partial autocorrelation within census tracts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pearson and Spearman correlations were similar, supporting robustness. HPI, an area measure of advantage, strongly negatively correlated with edentulism prevalence [correlation coefficient: -0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.87, -0.86]. A change of 1.0 in HPI corresponded to an estimated decrease in edentulism prevalence of 5.9% (linear model adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.78). Racially segregated census tracts with Hispanics or Blacks alone were positively correlated with edentulism prevalence [0.60, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.62; and 0.33, 95% CI: 0.31, 0.35, respectively]. The converse was seen in census tracts with non-Hispanic Whites alone [-0.57, 95% CI: -0.58, -0.55]. Global Moran's I statistic for edentulism (0.13) and HPI scores (0.19) were significant (both p < .001) indicating geospatial autocorrelation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher disadvantage and minority racial segregation within census tracts were positively correlated with edentulism prevalence. Future research and policy should consider possible interventions improving SDOH to reduce oral health inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":10580,"journal":{"name":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community dentistry and oral epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12995","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Individual-level social determinant of health (SDOH) measures alone may insufficiently explain disparities in edentulism among seniors. Therefore, the authors examined the correlation of census tract-level SDOH and residential racial segregation measures with edentulism in Californian adults aged ≥65 years old.

Methods: Explanatory variables were obtained from Healthy Places Index (HPI), the National Cancer Institute and diversitydatakids.org. The edentulism outcome variable was obtained from CDC's PLACES small area estimates from the 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data. Pearson and Spearman rank correlations were estimated. Multiple linear regression and multi-collinearity evaluations were performed. The Global Moran's I statistic assessed partial autocorrelation within census tracts.

Results: Pearson and Spearman correlations were similar, supporting robustness. HPI, an area measure of advantage, strongly negatively correlated with edentulism prevalence [correlation coefficient: -0.87; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.87, -0.86]. A change of 1.0 in HPI corresponded to an estimated decrease in edentulism prevalence of 5.9% (linear model adjusted R2 = 0.78). Racially segregated census tracts with Hispanics or Blacks alone were positively correlated with edentulism prevalence [0.60, 95% CI: 0.58, 0.62; and 0.33, 95% CI: 0.31, 0.35, respectively]. The converse was seen in census tracts with non-Hispanic Whites alone [-0.57, 95% CI: -0.58, -0.55]. Global Moran's I statistic for edentulism (0.13) and HPI scores (0.19) were significant (both p < .001) indicating geospatial autocorrelation.

Conclusions: Higher disadvantage and minority racial segregation within census tracts were positively correlated with edentulism prevalence. Future research and policy should consider possible interventions improving SDOH to reduce oral health inequities.

人口普查区地理空间分析比较加利福尼亚老年人牙齿脱落与健康的社会决定因素:生态研究。
目的:单凭个人层面的健康社会决定因素(SDOH)衡量标准可能不足以解释老年人中存在的镶牙差异。因此,作者研究了加州年龄≥65 岁的成年人中人口普查区级 SDOH 和居住地种族隔离措施与拔牙的相关性:解释变量来自健康场所指数(HPI)、国家癌症研究所和多样性数据儿童网站。拔牙症结果变量来自美国疾病预防控制中心(CDC)的PLACES小地区估计值,该估计值来自2018年行为风险因素监测系统数据。估计了皮尔逊和斯皮尔曼等级相关性。进行了多元线性回归和多重共线性评估。全球莫兰 I 统计评估了普查区内的部分自相关性:结果:皮尔逊相关性和斯皮尔曼相关性相似,支持稳健性。HPI 是衡量地区优势的指标,与牙齿缺失率呈强烈负相关[相关系数:-0.87;95% 置信区间 (CI):-0.87, -0.86]。HPI 每变化 1.0,龋齿患病率估计就会下降 5.9%(线性模型调整 R2 = 0.78)。仅有西班牙裔或黑人的种族隔离人口普查区与蛀牙患病率呈正相关[分别为 0.60,95% CI:0.58,0.62;0.33,95% CI:0.31,0.35]。在仅有非西班牙裔白人的人口普查区,情况则相反[-0.57,95% CI:-0.58,-0.55]。关于缺牙症(0.13)和 HPI 分数(0.19)的全球 Moran's I 统计显著(均为 p 结论):人口普查区内较高的不利条件和少数民族种族隔离与蛀牙流行率呈正相关。未来的研究和政策应考虑改善 SDOH 的可能干预措施,以减少口腔健康不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology
Community dentistry and oral epidemiology 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The aim of Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology is to serve as a forum for scientifically based information in community dentistry, with the intention of continually expanding the knowledge base in the field. The scope is therefore broad, ranging from original studies in epidemiology, behavioral sciences related to dentistry, and health services research through to methodological reports in program planning, implementation and evaluation. Reports dealing with people of all age groups are welcome. The journal encourages manuscripts which present methodologically detailed scientific research findings from original data collection or analysis of existing databases. Preference is given to new findings. Confirmations of previous findings can be of value, but the journal seeks to avoid needless repetition. It also encourages thoughtful, provocative commentaries on subjects ranging from research methods to public policies. Purely descriptive reports are not encouraged, nor are behavioral science reports with only marginal application to dentistry. The journal is published bimonthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信