Chengrui Zhang , Yan Xie , Bingbing Liu , Zexian Huang , Rowan K. Flad , Huan Liu , Yue Li
{"title":"Emulation and retention: Horses and chariots at the burial site of Majiayuan in northwestern China","authors":"Chengrui Zhang , Yan Xie , Bingbing Liu , Zexian Huang , Rowan K. Flad , Huan Liu , Yue Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ara.2024.100533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Animals often acquire ritual and symbolic significance when incorporated into mortuary contexts in human society. In Bronze Age China, horses and chariots were frequently interred together as teams in separate pits associated with burials, forming integral components of the mortuary rituals among elites in settled states. Although examples are scarce, the mortuary use of horses and chariots was also observed in pastoral societies during the first millennium BCE. The examination of complete horse skeletons from an elite tomb at Majiayuan, a large burial site in northwestern China dating back to the 4th-3rd centuries BCE, indicates the integration of four adult, male, tall horses with an elaborate wooden chariot. Alongside the combination of four horse skulls and one chariot, which likely represents an alternative form of the team, these practices were exclusive to a select group of high-ranking individuals at Majiayuan. The selection, arrangement, and interment of horses and chariots followed the examples of four-horse-one-chariot sets in contemporary settled states, while also retaining pastoral society's practice of interring animal skulls and hooves in burials. This blend of emulation from settled states and retention of pastoral mortuary traditions reflects part of a ritualized set of mortuary practices at Majiayuan, highlighting the social importance attributed to horses in pastoral societies and their symbolic connections to centers of political power.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51847,"journal":{"name":"Archaeological Research in Asia","volume":"39 ","pages":"Article 100533"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeological Research in Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352226724000345","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Animals often acquire ritual and symbolic significance when incorporated into mortuary contexts in human society. In Bronze Age China, horses and chariots were frequently interred together as teams in separate pits associated with burials, forming integral components of the mortuary rituals among elites in settled states. Although examples are scarce, the mortuary use of horses and chariots was also observed in pastoral societies during the first millennium BCE. The examination of complete horse skeletons from an elite tomb at Majiayuan, a large burial site in northwestern China dating back to the 4th-3rd centuries BCE, indicates the integration of four adult, male, tall horses with an elaborate wooden chariot. Alongside the combination of four horse skulls and one chariot, which likely represents an alternative form of the team, these practices were exclusive to a select group of high-ranking individuals at Majiayuan. The selection, arrangement, and interment of horses and chariots followed the examples of four-horse-one-chariot sets in contemporary settled states, while also retaining pastoral society's practice of interring animal skulls and hooves in burials. This blend of emulation from settled states and retention of pastoral mortuary traditions reflects part of a ritualized set of mortuary practices at Majiayuan, highlighting the social importance attributed to horses in pastoral societies and their symbolic connections to centers of political power.
期刊介绍:
Archaeological Research in Asia presents high quality scholarly research conducted in between the Bosporus and the Pacific on a broad range of archaeological subjects of importance to audiences across Asia and around the world. The journal covers the traditional components of archaeology: placing events and patterns in time and space; analysis of past lifeways; and explanations for cultural processes and change. To this end, the publication will highlight theoretical and methodological advances in studying the past, present new data, and detail patterns that reshape our understanding of it. Archaeological Research in Asia publishes work on the full temporal range of archaeological inquiry from the earliest human presence in Asia with a special emphasis on time periods under-represented in other venues. Journal contributions are of three kinds: articles, case reports and short communications. Full length articles should present synthetic treatments, novel analyses, or theoretical approaches to unresolved issues. Case reports present basic data on subjects that are of broad interest because they represent key sites, sequences, and subjects that figure prominently, or should figure prominently, in how scholars both inside and outside Asia understand the archaeology of cultural and biological change through time. Short communications present new findings (e.g., radiocarbon dates) that are important to the extent that they reaffirm or change the way scholars in Asia and around the world think about Asian cultural or biological history.