End-tidal carbon dioxide during spontaneous breathing trial to predict extubation failure: A prospective observational study

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Faten May , Nicolas de Prost , Keyvan Razazi , Guillaume Carteaux , Armand Mekontso Dessap
{"title":"End-tidal carbon dioxide during spontaneous breathing trial to predict extubation failure: A prospective observational study","authors":"Faten May ,&nbsp;Nicolas de Prost ,&nbsp;Keyvan Razazi ,&nbsp;Guillaume Carteaux ,&nbsp;Armand Mekontso Dessap","doi":"10.1016/j.jcrc.2024.154870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite advances in weaning protocols, extubation failure (EF) is associated with poor outcomes. Many predictors of EF have been proposed, including hypercapnia at the end of the spontaneous breathing test (SBT). However, performing arterial blood gases at the end of SBT is not routinely recommended, whereas end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) can be routinely monitored during SBT.</p><p>We aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of EtCO2 to predict EF. Patients undergoing planned extubation were eligible. Non-inclusion criteria were tracheostomy and patients extubated after successful T-tube SBT. We recorded clinical data and EtCO2 in 189 patients during a successful one-hour low pressure support SBT.</p><p>EtCO2 measured before successful SBT was lower in patients with EF compared to those with successful extubation (27 [24–29] vs 30 [27–47] mmHg, <em>p</em> = 0.02), while EtCO2 measured at five minutes and at the end of the SBT was not different between the two groups (26 [22–28] vs. 29 [28–49] mmHg, <em>p</em> = 0.06 and 26 [26–29] vs. 29 [27–49] mmHg, <em>p</em> = 0.09, respectively). Variables identified by multivariable analysis as independently associated with EF were acute respiratory failure as the cause of intubation and ineffective cough.</p><p>Our study suggests that recording EtCO2 during successful SBT appears to have limited predictive value for EF.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of critical care","volume":"84 ","pages":"Article 154870"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of critical care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883944124003575","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite advances in weaning protocols, extubation failure (EF) is associated with poor outcomes. Many predictors of EF have been proposed, including hypercapnia at the end of the spontaneous breathing test (SBT). However, performing arterial blood gases at the end of SBT is not routinely recommended, whereas end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) can be routinely monitored during SBT.

We aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of EtCO2 to predict EF. Patients undergoing planned extubation were eligible. Non-inclusion criteria were tracheostomy and patients extubated after successful T-tube SBT. We recorded clinical data and EtCO2 in 189 patients during a successful one-hour low pressure support SBT.

EtCO2 measured before successful SBT was lower in patients with EF compared to those with successful extubation (27 [24–29] vs 30 [27–47] mmHg, p = 0.02), while EtCO2 measured at five minutes and at the end of the SBT was not different between the two groups (26 [22–28] vs. 29 [28–49] mmHg, p = 0.06 and 26 [26–29] vs. 29 [27–49] mmHg, p = 0.09, respectively). Variables identified by multivariable analysis as independently associated with EF were acute respiratory failure as the cause of intubation and ineffective cough.

Our study suggests that recording EtCO2 during successful SBT appears to have limited predictive value for EF.

预测拔管失败的自主呼吸时潮气末二氧化碳试验:前瞻性观察研究
尽管断奶方案取得了进步,但拔管失败(EF)仍与不良预后有关。有很多预测 EF 的方法,包括在自主呼吸测试(SBT)结束时出现高碳酸血症。然而,在 SBT 结束时进行动脉血气检测并不是常规建议,而在 SBT 期间可以常规监测潮气末二氧化碳(EtCO2)。计划拔管的患者均符合条件。气管造口术和成功进行 T 型管 SBT 后拔管的患者不在纳入标准之列。我们记录了 189 名患者在成功进行一小时低压支持 SBT 期间的临床数据和 EtCO2。与成功拔管的患者相比,EF 患者在成功进行 SBT 之前测量的 EtCO2 更低(27 [24-29] vs 30 [27-47] mmHg,p = 0.02),而在 5 分钟和 SBT 结束时测量的 EtCO2 在两组之间没有差异(分别为 26 [22-28] vs. 29 [28-49] mmHg,p = 0.06 和 26 [26-29] vs. 29 [27-49] mmHg,p = 0.09)。我们的研究表明,在成功的 SBT 过程中记录 EtCO2 似乎对 EF 的预测价值有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of critical care
Journal of critical care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.70%
发文量
237
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Critical Care, the official publication of the World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine (WFSICCM), is a leading international, peer-reviewed journal providing original research, review articles, tutorials, and invited articles for physicians and allied health professionals involved in treating the critically ill. The Journal aims to improve patient care by furthering understanding of health systems research and its integration into clinical practice. The Journal will include articles which discuss: All aspects of health services research in critical care System based practice in anesthesiology, perioperative and critical care medicine The interface between anesthesiology, critical care medicine and pain Integrating intraoperative management in preparation for postoperative critical care management and recovery Optimizing patient management, i.e., exploring the interface between evidence-based principles or clinical insight into management and care of complex patients The team approach in the OR and ICU System-based research Medical ethics Technology in medicine Seminars discussing current, state of the art, and sometimes controversial topics in anesthesiology, critical care medicine, and professional education Residency Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信